Anyone using a Jabra USB Headset with -current?

Hi! I just plugged a Jabra headset into my laptop, and the results were somewhat underwhelming. I have tried both connecting the headset directly to the laptop via a USB cable, and also by using the pre-paired bluetooth to USB dongle supplied with the headset. The symptoms are more or less the

Side effects when taring up /dev

Hi, I observed some weird behavior when I ran tar on a filesystem with a /dev directory. I ran the equivalent of: (cd / && tar -cf - . ) | (cd /somewhere && tar -xpf - ) and got the following error messages: tar: Couldn't list extended attributes: Invalid argument tar: Couldn't list extended

Re: BlackBox, SloppyFocus and -current

Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au> writes: > Date:Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:50:37 +0100 (CET) > From: Jarle Greipsland <ja...@uninett.no> > Message-ID: <20170130.195037.3233.ja...@uninett.no> > > | I noticed that new X11 code wa

Re: OpenVPN causes fresh -current to crash

Tom Ivar Helbekkmo writes: [ ... ] > Oh, and it's the client that hangs; the server seems to be just fine, > and a reboot of the client makes NFS reads behave normally again. On > the server, the output file got created, but is zero bytes. The error > logged on the client

Re: wm devices don't work under current amd64

Masanobu SAITOH <msai...@execsw.org> writes: > On 2016/11/28 17:16, Masanobu SAITOH wrote: >> Hello, Jarle. >> >> On 2016/11/27 0:45, Jarle Greipsland wrote: [ ... ] >>> Was this problem ever fixed? >> >> Perhaps no. I've added a lot of changes in

Re: i915 hangs after 201612251500Z changes

Cherry G. Mathew <che...@zyx.in> writes: >>>>>> "Jarle" == Jarle Greipsland <ja...@uninett.no> writes: > Jarle> Cherry G. Mathew <che...@zyx.in> writes: > >>>>>>> "Jun" == Jun Ebihara <j...@soum

Incorrect link status for wm0 network interface?

Hi, I have just booted a -current i386 GENERIC kernel on my Lenovo T400s laptop (userland is of 7.99.32 vintage). There seems to be something strange going on with regards to the carrier status for the built in wm0 network interface. When left unconfigured, it reports 'active' as its status.

Re: i915 hangs after 201612251500Z changes

Cherry G. Mathew writes: >> "Jun" == Jun Ebihara writes: [ ... ] > Does the following patch solve your problem ? > > -- > ~cherry > > --- x86_machdep.c.~1.80.~ 2017-01-02 21:20:21.682422476 +0530 > +++ x86_machdep.c 2017-01-09 13:20:12.018133390

Re: wm devices don't work under current amd64

Masanobu SAITOH writes: > Hi. > > On 2016/03/07 21:12, Tobias Nygren wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:57:02 +0900 >> Masanobu SAITOH wrote: >> >>> One of the possibility is that the multicast filter table and broadcast >>> bit in a register aren't set

Re: Mangled file system directory panic

chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes: > In article <20160811.153708.78150616.ja...@uninett.no>, > Jarle Greipsland <ja...@uninett.no> wrote: >>> The panic messages reported by crash is something like: >>> System panicked: /mnt: bad dir ino 42369 at offs

Re: Mangled file system directory panic

co...@sdf.org writes: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:37:08PM +0200, Jarle Greipsland wrote: >> [ Followups to port-i386, please ] >> I wrote[1]: >> > I have a system where I can almost deterministally provoke a >> > kernel panic by doing a 'tar -zxpf comp.tgz'. >&

Re: Mangled file system directory panic

[ Followups to port-i386, please ] I wrote[1]: > I have a system where I can almost deterministally provoke a > kernel panic by doing a 'tar -zxpf comp.tgz'. > > The panic messages reported by crash is something like: > System panicked: /mnt: bad dir ino 42369 at offset 560: NUL in name [] i=0,

Mangled file system directory panic

Hi, I have a system where I can almost deterministally provoke a kernel panic by doing a 'tar -zxpf comp.tgz'. The panic messages reported by crash is something like: System panicked: /mnt: bad dir ino 42369 at offset 560: NUL in name [] i=0, namlen=4 The directory mangling is quite severe, so

Re: 5 GHz band support for Intel WiFi chips?

Anders Magnusson ra...@ludd.ltu.se writes: my impression from various web sites is that the Intel WiFi device in my Lenovo T400s laptop has support for the 5 GHz band channels. However, it seems to never associate with any access points using such channels. It always ends up using some of

5 GHz band support for Intel WiFi chips?

Hi, my impression from various web sites is that the Intel WiFi device in my Lenovo T400s laptop has support for the 5 GHz band channels. However, it seems to never associate with any access points using such channels. It always ends up using some of the 2.4 GHz channels instead, or not being