On Dec 5, 7:56am, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} On Dec 5, 3:30pm, p...@vps1.whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) wrote:
}
} | > } The same sources were used to create a amd64-current system, and I was
} | > } able to install it successfully.
} | > }
} | > } FWIW, my source tree is time-stamped at "2015-12-05
On Dec 6, 6:36am, Paul Goyette wrote:
} On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, John Nemeth wrote:
} > On Dec 6, 6:12am, Paul Goyette wrote:
} > } On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, John Nemeth wrote:
} > }
} > } > } What's the backtrace? Ideally I'd like to remove the DIOCGPART code...
} > } >
} > } > I don't think there was
On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, John Nemeth wrote:
On Dec 6, 6:12am, Paul Goyette wrote:
} On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, John Nemeth wrote:
}
} > } What's the backtrace? Ideally I'd like to remove the DIOCGPART code...
} >
} > I don't think there was a backtrace. ...
}
} Correct. I was unable to get a backtrace
On Dec 6, 6:12am, Paul Goyette wrote:
} On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, John Nemeth wrote:
}
} > } What's the backtrace? Ideally I'd like to remove the DIOCGPART code...
} >
} > I don't think there was a backtrace. ...
}
} Correct. I was unable to get a backtrace - ddb got a recursive fault
} when I t
On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, John Nemeth wrote:
} What's the backtrace? Ideally I'd like to remove the DIOCGPART code...
I don't think there was a backtrace. ...
Correct. I was unable to get a backtrace - ddb got a recursive fault
when I tried to get the backtrace.
+--+---
On Dec 5, 1:57pm, jnem...@cue.bc.ca (John Nemeth) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Crash on -current on i386 (NOT amd64)
| I don't think there was a backtrace. I saw your comment on
| chat that you had fixed the lseek(SEEK_END) issue, and was curious
| what it was, so I looked for the commit
On Dec 5, 3:30pm, p...@vps1.whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Crash on -current on i386 (NOT amd64)
| > } The same sources were used to create a amd64-current system, and I was
| > } able to install it successfully.
| > }
| > } FWIW, my source tree is time-stamped
On Dec 5, 1:25pm, Paul Goyette wrote:
} On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, Paul Goyette wrote:
}
} >>> With up-to-the-minute sources, I got the following crash while trying
} >>> to install i386-current in a qemu-VM.
} >>>
} >>> ioctl DIOCGMEDIASIZE failed 19ge media |
} >>> uvm_fault(0xc2983d40, 0, 1) -> 0xe
} With up-to-the-minute sources, I got the following crash while trying
} to install i386-current in a qemu-VM.
}
} ioctl DIOCGMEDIASIZE failed 19ge media |
} uvm_fault(0xc2983d40, 0, 1) -> 0xe |
} fatal page fault in supervisor mode|
} trap type 6
On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, Paul Goyette wrote:
Let me try this again ...
With up-to-the-minute sources, I got the following crash while trying
to install i386-current in a qemu-VM.
ioctl DIOCGMEDIASIZE failed 19ge media |
uvm_fault(0xc2983d40, 0, 1) -> 0xe |
fatal page fault
Let me try this again ...
With up-to-the-minute sources, I got the following crash while trying
to install i386-current in a qemu-VM.
ioctl DIOCGMEDIASIZE failed 19ge media |
uvm_fault(0xc2983d40, 0, 1) -> 0xe |
fatal page fault in supervisor mode
11 matches
Mail list logo
