On 23/10/2020 08:25, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
Roy Marples wrote:
This is rump crashing and I don't know why.
If the rump kernel crashes in the test, that likely means the real
kernel will crash in actual use.
I can't get a backtrace to tell me where the problem is.
I managed to get one
Roy Marples wrote:
> This is rump crashing and I don't know why.
If the rump kernel crashes in the test, that likely means the real
kernel will crash in actual use.
> I can't get a backtrace to tell me where the problem is.
I managed to get one this way:
sysctl -w
Hi Andreas
On 22/10/2020 09:00, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
Hi Roy,
On Oct 16, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
The newly failing test cases are:
net/if_l2tp/t_l2tp:l2tp_basic_ipv4overipv4
net/if_l2tp/t_l2tp:l2tp_basic_ipv4overipv6
net/if_l2tp/t_l2tp:l2tp_basic_ipv6overipv4
Hi Roy,
On Oct 16, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
> net/if_l2tp/t_l2tp:l2tp_basic_ipv4overipv4
> net/if_l2tp/t_l2tp:l2tp_basic_ipv4overipv6
> net/if_l2tp/t_l2tp:l2tp_basic_ipv6overipv4
> net/if_l2tp/t_l2tp:l2tp_basic_ipv6overipv6
>
