Re: extra files in DESTDIR

2021-02-27 Thread Greg Troxel
bch writes: questions I still wonder about: >>> what arch are you building for >>> what was the build host >>> what was your build.sh line > So I nuked the /usr/obj directory completely (which contained the DESTDIR), > used the -A switch to confirm cvs co is properly tracking -current,

Re: extra files in DESTDIR

2021-02-26 Thread Paul Goyette
It *was* worse when I had errant cvs tags in effect, and so part of the tree was updated differently than the rest, but thats sorted out now. Since you readily acknowledge having had some errant tagging issues in your tree previously, I would just delete and re-checkout your source tree. At the

Re: extra files in DESTDIR

2021-02-26 Thread Robert Swindells
Bch wrote: > >I've been getting this (and worse) for a while, and just living with it: > >=== 1 extra files in DESTDIR = >Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. >File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? >-

Re: extra files in DESTDIR

2021-02-26 Thread Greg Troxel
Bch writes: > I've been getting this (and worse) for a while, and just living with it: > > === 1 extra files in DESTDIR = > Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. > File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? > -- &g

extra files in DESTDIR

2021-02-26 Thread Bch
I've been getting this (and worse) for a while, and just living with it: === 1 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? -- ./usr/libexec/ld.elf_so = end of 1

MKDEBUG=yes results in hundreds of extra files in $DESTDIR

2020-05-02 Thread Paul Goyette
Looks like recent changes to module .mk files doesn't work with MKDEBUG=yes ... === 615 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? -- ./usr/libdata/debug/stand/amd64-xen

Re: Build fails on extra files in DESTDIR, what does that mean?

2015-04-28 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Ian D. Leroux: > Passing the -r option to ./build.sh will force a clean of DESTDIR. That's good to know! I just went through ./build.sh again, see -r option clears both DESTDIR and TOOLDIR. I think the DESTDIR must have still had stuff from 6.99.40. Tom

Re: Build fails on extra files in DESTDIR, what does that mean?

2015-04-28 Thread Ian D. Leroux
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:21:07 +0200 "Ian D. Leroux" wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 07:40, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > But I am still curious about a build failing on extra files in > > DESTDIR and how to avoid it, remember this happening before in > > NetBSD but no

Re: Build fails on extra files in DESTDIR, what does that mean?

2015-04-28 Thread Ian D. Leroux
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 07:40, Thomas Mueller wrote: > But I am still curious about a build failing on extra files in DESTDIR > and how to avoid it, remember this happening before in NetBSD but not > FreeBSD. ./build.sh does an automatic make cleandir by default (if you don't pass

Build fails on extra files in DESTDIR, what does that mean?

2015-04-28 Thread Thomas Mueller
SORT=/BETA1/netbsd-HEAD/usr/src/../tooldir/bin/nbtsort\ -q /bin/sh /BETA1/netbsd-HEAD/usr/src/distrib/sets/checkflist -L base,x -M /BETA1/netbsd-HEAD/usr/src/../obj/BETA1/netbsd-HEAD/usr/src/destdir.amd64/METALOG.sanitised === 18 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but m

Re: Extra files in DESTDIR with MKRUMP=no

2015-02-04 Thread Ian D. Leroux
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:39:42 + (GMT) Robert Swindells wrote: > idler...@fastmail.fm wrote: > I also build with MKRUMP=no but have the following extra patch in my > local tree: > > Robert Swindells > > Index: tests/mi > === > RCS

Re: Extra files in DESTDIR with MKRUMP=no

2015-01-29 Thread Ian D. Leroux
d.sh kernel=SCRAMEUSTACHE && ./build.sh > >distribution > > > >fails with > > > >=== 1 extra files in DESTDIR = > >Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. > >File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? > >---

Re: Extra files in DESTDIR with MKRUMP=no

2015-01-29 Thread Robert Swindells
till something wrong with the set lists. With >amd64 CURRENT as of last night and after deleting the entire contents >of obj/ and tools/, > >./build.sh tools && ./build.sh kernel=SCRAMEUSTACHE && ./build.sh distribution > >fails with > >=== 1 extra

Re: Extra files in DESTDIR with MKRUMP=no

2015-01-28 Thread Ian D. Leroux
and after deleting the entire contents of obj/ and tools/, ./build.sh tools && ./build.sh kernel=SCRAMEUSTACHE && ./build.sh distribution fails with === 1 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ?

Re: Extra files in DESTDIR with MKRUMP=no

2014-12-08 Thread Ian D. Leroux
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:10:27 + Justin Cormack wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Ian D. Leroux > wrote: > > === 4 extra files in DESTDIR = > > Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. > > File is obsolete

Re: Extra files in DESTDIR with MKRUMP=no

2014-12-08 Thread Justin Cormack
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Ian D. Leroux wrote: > On amd64, > > $ ./build.sh distribution > > from an empty obj directory failed > last night (and several times previously) with: > > === 4 extra files in DESTDIR = > Files in DESTDIR but missing from f

Extra files in DESTDIR with MKRUMP=no

2014-12-07 Thread Ian D. Leroux
On amd64, $ ./build.sh distribution from an empty obj directory failed last night (and several times previously) with: === 4 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date

Re: 2 extra files in DESTDIR

2014-02-21 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:29:53PM -0800, B Harder wrote: > === 2 extra files in DESTDIR = > Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. > File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? > -- > ./usr/include/g++/complex.h > ./u

2 extra files in DESTDIR

2014-02-21 Thread B Harder
=== 2 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? -- ./usr/include/g++/complex.h ./usr/include/gcc-4.1 = end of 2 extra files === -- Brad Harder