Le 17/10/2019 à 14:45, Maxime Villard a écrit :
Le 17/10/2019 à 14:07, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:43:48PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
On Thu 17 Oct 2019 at 11:07:44 +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
I guess we whould disable the messages on this particular file for now as
the
Le 17/10/2019 à 14:07, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:43:48PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
On Thu 17 Oct 2019 at 11:07:44 +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
I guess we whould disable the messages on this particular file for now as
the others have suggested, and file a PR in LLVM/GCC
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:43:48PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
> On Thu 17 Oct 2019 at 11:07:44 +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> > I guess we whould disable the messages on this particular file for now as
> > the others have suggested, and file a PR in LLVM/GCC, because apart from
> > a compiler bug I don'
On Thu 17 Oct 2019 at 11:07:44 +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> I guess we whould disable the messages on this particular file for now as
> the others have suggested, and file a PR in LLVM/GCC, because apart from
> a compiler bug I don't see what it could be.
The original error has no place in a fre
I guess we whould disable the messages on this particular file for now as
the others have suggested, and file a PR in LLVM/GCC, because apart from
a compiler bug I don't see what it could be.
Le 17/10/2019 à 09:22, J. Hannken-Illjes a écrit :
Any chance we can build x86 kernels without DIAGNOSTI
Any chance we can build x86 kernels without DIAGNOSTIC again?
Does it need a PR?
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig
> On 15. Oct 2019, at 17:56, John D. Baker wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
>
>> If the problem is the compiler bug, the patch
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
> If the problem is the compiler bug, the patch like the following
> may be effective.
> [snip]
I applied a similar change for i386 and with it the stock NET4501
config (w/"options DIAGNOSTIC" commented out) builds successfully.
+Index: sys/arch/i386/conf
Hi,
Maxime Villard writes:
> I don't understand what this error means. There is nothing related to
> longjmp in this code or any code I've touched, and the FPU code does
> not rely on that. As well I don't see what difference SVS could make
> since it doesn't rely on that either.
>
> No idea, lo
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 04:31:08PM -0500, John D. Baker wrote:
> > Building the NET4501 kernel with 9.99.17 sources fails with:
> >
> > /x/current/src/sys/arch/x86/x86/vm_machdep.c: In function 'cpu_lwp_fork':
> > /x/current/src/sys/arch/x86/x86/vm_mac
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:31:08 +0100
Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 04:31:08PM -0500, John D. Baker wrote:
> > Building the NET4501 kernel with 9.99.17 sources fails with:
> >
> > [...]
> > # compile NET4501/vm_machdep.o
> > /r0/build/current/tools/amd64/bin/i486--netbsdelf-gcc
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 04:31:08PM -0500, John D. Baker wrote:
> Building the NET4501 kernel with 9.99.17 sources fails with:
>
> [...]
> # compile NET4501/vm_machdep.o
> /r0/build/current/tools/amd64/bin/i486--netbsdelf-gcc -msoft-float -mno-mmx
> -mno-sse -mno-avx -ffreestanding -fno-zero-in
Le 14/10/2019 à 01:01, Chavdar Ivanov a écrit :
My amd64 build also failed with
...
src/tests/lib/libnvmm/h_mem_assist.c:178:2: error: missing initializer
for field 'off' of 'const struct test'
[-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
...
(and many more).
Ah yes, I was doing local builds of it, not
Christos committed a fix for this one.
Thomas
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:01:51AM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> My amd64 build also failed with
> ...
> src/tests/lib/libnvmm/h_mem_assist.c:178:2: error: missing initializer
> for field 'off' of 'const struct test'
> [-Werror=missing-field-initiali
My amd64 build also failed with
...
src/tests/lib/libnvmm/h_mem_assist.c:178:2: error: missing initializer
for field 'off' of 'const struct test'
[-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
...
(and many more).
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 23:48, matthew green wrote:
>
> Robert Swindells writes:
> >
> > "John
Robert Swindells writes:
>
> "John D. Baker"
> >Building the NET4501 kernel with 9.99.17 sources fails with:
> >
> >/x/current/src/sys/arch/x86/x86/vm_machdep.c: In function 'cpu_lwp_fork':
> >/x/current/src/sys/arch/x86/x86/vm_machdep.c:134:21: error: variable 'pcb2'
> >might be clobbered by 'l
"John D. Baker"
>Building the NET4501 kernel with 9.99.17 sources fails with:
>
>/x/current/src/sys/arch/x86/x86/vm_machdep.c: In function 'cpu_lwp_fork':
>/x/current/src/sys/arch/x86/x86/vm_machdep.c:134:21: error: variable 'pcb2'
>might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork' [-Werror=clobbered]
Building the NET4501 kernel with 9.99.17 sources fails with:
[...]
# compile NET4501/vm_machdep.o
/r0/build/current/tools/amd64/bin/i486--netbsdelf-gcc -msoft-float -mno-mmx
-mno-sse -mno-avx -ffreestanding -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -g -Os -fstack-protector
17 matches
Mail list logo
