Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"

2022-09-04 Thread Robert Swindells
"John D. Baker" wrote: > Well, 3 out of 4 kernels built when the above procedure was followed. > the following config still fails when the old DRM drivers are enabled: Your RACKMOUNT config builds fine for me (apart from plip but I will fix that), are you sure that the link errors you are

Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"

2022-09-03 Thread Robert Swindells
"John D. Baker" wrote: >On Sat, 3 Sep 2022, Robert Swindells wrote: >> You look to be mixing drm and drm2 in your build, you don't want to do >> that, you want one or the other. > >_I_ am not. It's the result of whatever was changed with the introduction >of "options DRM_LEGACY". I've built

Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"

2022-09-03 Thread Robert Swindells
"John D. Baker" wrote: > I have several custom kernels for i386 machines which I can no-longer > build since the introduction of "options DRM_LEGACY". > > These kernels are for machines with > > ATI mach64, rage128, and/or old radeon (R100) > > As such, these kernels have all the DRMKMS