Re: netbsd-9 MKDEBUG{,_LIB) build vs debug set lists?

2019-10-02 Thread John D. Baker
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019, John D. Baker wrote: > A non-update build of amd64 is underway > but has not reached the "checkflist" stage yet. And it has just passed the "checkflist" stage. In case anyone runs into this as well, a clean (non-update) build appears to put it right again. -- |/"\ John D. B

Re: netbsd-9 MKDEBUG{,_LIB) build vs debug set lists?

2019-10-01 Thread John D. Baker
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Martin Husemann wrote: > > == 1 missing files in DESTDIR > > Files in flist but missing from DESTDIR. > > File wasn't installed ? > > -- > > ./usr/libdata/debug/lib/libpthread.so.1.4.debug > > end of 1 missing fi

Re: netbsd-9 MKDEBUG{,_LIB) build vs debug set lists?

2019-09-30 Thread Martin Husemann
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:40:26AM -0500, John D. Baker wrote: > As I build everything with MKDEBUG=yes MKDEBUG_LIB=yes. recent updates > to the netbsd-9 branch cause build breakage. E.g., on i386 and sparc: >> > == 1 missing files in DESTDIR > Files in flist but missing from DESTD

netbsd-9 MKDEBUG{,_LIB) build vs debug set lists?

2019-09-30 Thread John D. Baker
As I build everything with MKDEBUG=yes MKDEBUG_LIB=yes. recent updates to the netbsd-9 branch cause build breakage. E.g., on i386 and sparc: == 1 missing files in DESTDIR Files in flist but missing from DESTDIR. File wasn't installed ? -- ./u