On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:24:11AM -, Michael van Elst wrote:
> w...@netbsd.org (Thomas Klausner) writes:
>
> >> The biggest change recently is probably that my bulk build switched
> >> from ghc92 to ghc94, but I don't know if that could cause this.
>
> >Next bulk build, next panic, quite
w...@netbsd.org (Thomas Klausner) writes:
>> The biggest change recently is probably that my bulk build switched
>> from ghc92 to ghc94, but I don't know if that could cause this.
>Next bulk build, next panic, quite reliably. Has anyone else seen this?
Not yet, maybe this is the first use of
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 02:00:07PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> I have a new problem on a system running 10.99.2/amd64 from Jan 27,
> which was heavily bulk building most of the time, and stable.
>
> Now I have seen this panic twice today already (OCR'd so beware of typos):
>
> panic: kernel
Hi!
I have a new problem on a system running 10.99.2/amd64 from Jan 27,
which was heavily bulk building most of the time, and stable.
Now I have seen this panic twice today already (OCR'd so beware of typos):
panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "c->c_cpu->cc_lwp == curlwp ||
c->c_cu->ce_active
