Hi all, the suggestion is reasonable and I agree that mutt-1.5 is not a development (or alpha/beta) version, instead it runs pretty stable for a long time now.
So: I'd have no objections against the suggested change. Best regards Udo On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 23:07:58 +0200, Chris Rees wrote: > Copying in maintainer. > > On 28 June 2012 21:56, David O'Brien <obr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:11:47PM +0000, Cy Schubert wrote: > >> FreeBSD ports repository > >> Modified files: > >> mail/mutt-devel Makefile > > > > Given I don't think we'll ever see a Mutt 1.6 and some (many IT folks?) > > are scared off by the "-devel" desgination; what do you think about > > renaming 'mail/mutt' to 'mail/mutt14' and 'mail/mutt-devel' to 'mail/mutt' > > [post subversion]. > > > > At this point Mutt 1.4 is very long in the tooth and 1.5 is where the > > modern features are. I think it would benefit our users if > > 'pkg_add -r mutt' got 1.5 instead of 1.4 > > > > -- > > -- David > > _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
