Re: HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD (was: cvs commit: src Makefile README)

2006-06-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 12 June 2006 19:37, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Monday, 12 June 2006 at 8:49:56 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday 09 June 2006 20:57, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Friday, 9 June 2006 at 8:53:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:48, Greg 'groggy'

Re: HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD (was: cvs commit: src Makefile README)

2006-06-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday 09 June 2006 20:38, Tom Rhodes wrote: On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:53:47 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:48, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2006 at 10:51:45 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 06 June 2006 23:33, Tom

Re: HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD (was: cvs commit: src Makefile README)

2006-06-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday 09 June 2006 20:57, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Friday, 9 June 2006 at 8:53:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:48, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2006 at 10:51:45 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: I thought the obfuscation was intentional as

Re: HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD (was: cvs commit: src Makefile README)

2006-06-12 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Monday, 12 June 2006 at 8:49:56 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday 09 June 2006 20:57, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Friday, 9 June 2006 at 8:53:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:48, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: Obfuscation is always wrong. Not in this case.

Re: HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD (was: cvs commit: src Makefile README)

2006-06-12 Thread Tom Rhodes
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:21:55 +0100 Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 08:38:02PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:53:47 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:48, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 7

Re: HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD (was: cvs commit: src Makefile README)

2006-06-10 Thread Ceri Davies
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 08:38:02PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:53:47 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:48, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2006 at 10:51:45 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 06 June 2006

Re: HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD (was: cvs commit: src Makefile README)

2006-06-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:48, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2006 at 10:51:45 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 06 June 2006 23:33, Tom Rhodes wrote: trhodes 2006-06-07 03:33:48 UTC FreeBSD src repository Modified files: .

Re: HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD (was: cvs commit: src Makefile README)

2006-06-09 Thread Tom Rhodes
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:53:47 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:48, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2006 at 10:51:45 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 06 June 2006 23:33, Tom Rhodes wrote: trhodes 2006-06-07 03:33:48 UTC

Re: HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD (was: cvs commit: src Makefile README)

2006-06-09 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Friday, 9 June 2006 at 8:53:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:48, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2006 at 10:51:45 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: I thought the obfuscation was intentional as very few people should be doing a 'make world' without a

HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD (was: cvs commit: src Makefile README)

2006-06-07 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Wednesday, 7 June 2006 at 10:51:45 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 06 June 2006 23:33, Tom Rhodes wrote: trhodes 2006-06-07 03:33:48 UTC FreeBSD src repository Modified files: .Makefile README Log: Simply running ``make world'' will bomb