On 8 Mar 2007 at 13:36, Doug Barton wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
A forced commit on ports/x11-wm/wmii-devel/pkg-descr would give
FreshPorts something to display here:
And improving your software would eliminate the need for otherwise
pointless commits.
Yes, yes it would.
My original
sat 2007-03-08 20:25:55 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
x11-wm Makefile
x11-wm/wmii Makefile
x11-wm/wmii-develMakefile distinfo pkg-plist
Added files:
x11-wm/wmii-devel/files patch-util.c
Removed files:
On 8 Mar 2007 at 20:25, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
sat 2007-03-08 20:25:55 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
x11-wm Makefile
x11-wm/wmii Makefile
x11-wm/wmii-develMakefile distinfo pkg-plist
Added files:
Dan Langille wrote:
A forced commit on ports/x11-wm/wmii-devel/pkg-descr would give
FreshPorts something to display here:
And improving your software would eliminate the need for otherwise
pointless commits.
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
On 2007.03.08 13:36:24 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
A forced commit on ports/x11-wm/wmii-devel/pkg-descr would give
FreshPorts something to display here:
And improving your software would eliminate the need for otherwise
pointless commits.
Repo-copies should have
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
Repo-copies should have forced commit on the new files to show they
were copied, at least thats the policy/guidelines as I know it.
If you're correct, that is of course an entirely different kettle of fish.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Barton wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
A forced commit on ports/x11-wm/wmii-devel/pkg-descr would give
FreshPorts something to display here:
And improving your software would eliminate the need for otherwise
pointless commits.
It is policy
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:11:14PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Repo-copies should have forced commit on the new files to show they
were copied, at least thats the policy/guidelines as I know it.
If you're correct, that is of course an entirely different kettle of fish.
That's been the policy
On 3/9/07, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:11:14PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Repo-copies should have forced commit on the new files to show they
were copied, at least thats the policy/guidelines as I know it.
If you're correct, that is of course an entirely
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:21:55AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
That's been the policy as long as I know.
We've had a thread in November about this with
no particular ending. Did I miss anything?
AFAIAC it's the policy. How else, on repocopies, can you tell from the
CVS logs what
On 3/9/07, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:21:55AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
That's been the policy as long as I know.
We've had a thread in November about this with
no particular ending. Did I miss anything?
AFAIAC it's the policy.
Right, but we're
11 matches
Mail list logo
