Quoting Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 7 Feb 2007
12:42:08 -0800):
On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
Does this mean we can expect to see the disabling of GEOM
exclusive-use protections disappear from normal administrative
activities soon, as there will now
Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
marcel 2007-02-07 18:55:31 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/amd64/conf GENERIC
sys/arm/conf EP80219
sys/conf NOTES files files.powerpc options
sys/i386/confGENERIC
On Feb 8, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 7 Feb 2007
12:42:08 -0800):
On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
Does this mean we can expect to see the disabling of GEOM
exclusive-use protections disappear from
On Feb 8, 2007, at 6:07 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
I can't see any mention of this in either commit logs or
code comments, and the code has changed so much that it is impossible
to determine if this issue has been addressed.
It should be resolved. The tests have been relaxed.
--
Marcel
marcel 2007-02-07 18:55:31 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/amd64/conf GENERIC
sys/arm/conf EP80219
sys/conf NOTES files files.powerpc options
sys/i386/confGENERIC
sys/ia64/confDEFAULTS
sys/pc98/conf
On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Evolve the ctlreq interface added to geom_gpt into a generic
partitioning class that supports multiple schemes. Current
schemes supported are APM (Apple Partition Map) and GPT.
Change all
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Evolve the ctlreq interface added to geom_gpt into a generic partitioning
class that supports multiple schemes. Current schemes supported are APM
(Apple Partition Map) and GPT. Change all GEOM_APPLE anf GEOM_GPT options
into GEOM_PART_APM and
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Watson writes:
The ctlreq interface supports verbs to create and destroy
partitioning schemes on a disk; to add, delete and modify
partitions; and to commit or undo changes made.
Does this mean we can expect to see the disabling of GEOM exclusive-use
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Watson writes:
The ctlreq interface supports verbs to create and destroy
partitioning schemes on a disk; to add, delete and modify
partitions; and to commit or undo changes made.
Does this mean we can
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Watson
writes:
The ctlreq interface supports verbs to create and destroy
partitioning schemes on a disk; to add, delete and modify
partitions; and to commit or undo changes made.
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 18:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Watson
writes:
The ctlreq interface supports verbs to create and destroy
partitioning schemes on a disk; to add,
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 18:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
I assume phk@ is referring to the geom debug flags sysctl. The problem
with that approach is that it disabled (and potentially left disabled if
the flag wasn't cleared as the tool exits) all protection for the
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Watson writes:
The ctlreq interface supports verbs to create and destroy
partitioning schemes on a disk; to add, delete and modify
partitions; and to commit or undo changes made.
Does this mean we
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson writes:
Does this mean we can expect to see the disabling of GEOM
exclusive-use protections disappear from normal administrative
activities soon, as there will now be approved channels to
incrementally change the layout of in-use partition tables?
14 matches
Mail list logo
