On Feb 13, 2007, at 7:22 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
From: Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:56:43 + (UTC)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rodrigc 2007-02-13 05:56:43 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
sys/fs/unionfs
From: Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:56:43 + (UTC)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rodrigc 2007-02-13 05:56:43 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
sys/fs/unionfs union.h union_subr.c union_vfsops.c
rodrigc 2006-12-02 19:35:56 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/fs/unionfs union.h union_subr.c union_vfsops.c
union_vnops.c
sbin/mount_unionfs Makefile mount_unionfs.8 mount_unionfs.c
Log:
Many, many thanks to Masanori OZAWA
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
rodrigc 2006-12-02 19:35:56 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/fs/unionfs union.h union_subr.c union_vfsops.c
union_vnops.c
sbin/mount_unionfs Makefile mount_unionfs.8 mount_unionfs.c
Log:
What about the
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:46:04PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
What about the VFS changes that were also made in the latest patchset?
I'm looking at that change separately, and getting a few
other people to look at it too, before committing.
--
Craig Rodrigues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What you committed works without the associated VFS changes? If not,
why rush this commit in?
Scott
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:46:04PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
What about the VFS changes that were also made in the latest patchset?
I'm looking at
