Jan Keirse wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef op 10/11/2008 11:51:32:
>
>> Frankly, if you can't sustain the open source model anymore I'd suggest
> you
>> to go proprietary starting with evs. You won't improve sales annoying
> users.
>
> If EVS uses CVSNT code that wasn't originally written
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef op 10/11/2008 11:51:32:
> Frankly, if you can't sustain the open source model anymore I'd suggest
you
> to go proprietary starting with evs. You won't improve sales annoying
users.
If EVS uses CVSNT code that wasn't originally written by mach-hare they
can't close t
Hi Jan,
> Either from people running to subversion, the `real free' sollution
> already sounds much more `sexy', or worse even if someone gets sick of it
> and forks (although I doubt a fork would be successfull given that
> everything is still under GPL.)
I don't want to start a SVN vs CVSNT
Jan Keirse wrote:
> essentially replaced it. This has happened for other products. While
> there's no license change involved here it is a policy change, the request
> for financial support is in my opinion now not polite. I requested my
> company to get a license based on the polite mails on t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef op 07/11/2008 15:43:36:
> Clóvis Garcia Marcondes wrote:
> > Tony,
> >
> >
> > I got your point but should be nice at least to advise when you change
> > the way the product works. I just asked because I´m testing the new
> > version together with the CVS Suite Tria
