suffice for
now.
Thanks for your support,
Terry
-Original Message-
From: Risman, Mark [mailto:mark.ris...@mlb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:12 PM
To: Terry Beavers
Cc: cvsnt@cvsnt.org
Subject: RE: [cvsnt] Is it possible to completely lock down HEAD,but
leave a BRANCH open for R
ry Beavers
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:09 PM
To: cvsnt@cvsnt.org
Subject: Re: [cvsnt] Is it possible to completely lock down HEAD,but
leave a BRANCH open for READ ONLY access?
First, I apologize for the confusion, mainly mine.
Second, I reset my AclMode to normal and then started fresh wi
First, I apologize for the confusion, mainly mine.
Second, I reset my AclMode to normal and then started fresh with new
ACL's as follows, but am still unable to checkout code from the
TEST_BRANCH as a "guest" user.
>From my understanding, these ACLs should translate to the following
Terry,
> I am either we todd did or confused or maybe a little bit of both, but
> if I try your method of setting AclMode to compat instead of
> normal and
> then set up my ACLs accordingly, meaning
> noread,nowrite,nocreate,notag,nocontrol on HEAD, but read only on
> TEST_BRANCH, I am still unab
Terry,
> I am trying to completely lock down HEAD, but leave a BRANCH open for
> READ ONLY access using cvs chacl command, but it seems if I lock down
> HEAD, then my BRANCH gets locked down as well, even if I create an acl
> that is supposed to allow READ access on the BRANCH.
>
> For example:
Greetings,
I am trying to completely lock down HEAD, but leave a BRANCH open for
READ ONLY access using cvs chacl command, but it seems if I lock down
HEAD, then my BRANCH gets locked down as well, even if I create an acl
that is supposed to allow READ access on the BRANCH.
For example:
AclMo
