uesday 26 February 2008, Phil Weighill-Smith wrote:
> > That's the sort of answer I was looking for. Thanks,
> >
> > Phil :n)
> >
> > PS: Was this an RTFM moment?!
>
> I wish I could say the answer was yes... :-(
>
> I think most of our docs on the
y like the issue in:
> http://www.nabble.com/Does-CXF-Support-Interfaces-as-Web-Params--to15702272.html
>
> I'll look at it more tonight or tomorrow.
>
> Dan
>
> On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Phil Weighill-Smith wrote:
> > Dan,
> >
> > So we managed
That's the sort of answer I was looking for. Thanks,
Phil :n)
PS: Was this an RTFM moment?!
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Phil Weighill-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:25:16 -0700
1.5.x
environment ideally since we probably need to support 1.5.x JREs.
Phil :n.
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Cc: "Phil Weighill-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 25 February 2008 17:08:00 o&
oth in the IDEA integration with CXF and via the command
line. The JDK I'm using is 1.6.0.03.
Any suggestions?
Phil :n.
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Cc: "Phil Weighill-Smith" <[EMAIL PR
I'll get hold of the snapshots on Monday and try it out then. Thanks.
Phil :n)
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Cc: "Phil Weighill-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 22 February 2008 17:26:5
either not output
> it or output the correct namespace. I'll need to experiment a bit to
> figure out which.
>
> Can you log a JIRA (feel free to assign to me) so it gets tracked. (I'm
> busy with other stuff for the next couple days). Better yet, check out
>
Thanks for the suggestions. I guess I'll live with the xs:extensions for
now (I guess they don't really affect the actual XML structure, save
element ordering).
Phil :n.
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:06 -0500, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:01 -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > Honestly
Regarding target namespace and the elementFormDefault issues...
Interestingly the package-info.java approach doesn't seem to work.
Whilst this sets the default element form to qualified, each element is
then generated with the form="unqualified" attribute set. D'oh! I guess
I'll have to use the Xm
gt; namespace = "http://the.namespace.to.use";,
> elementFormDefault = javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED)
> package the package;
>
>
> > * ensuring the WSDL contains appropriate documentation.
>
> THAT is something I don't know if it&#x
I have an SEI API that includes some data objects. Some of the data
objects share some common attributes which I have implemented via
extraction of a base class and inheritance from that where needed.
When I use java2wsdl this inheritance gets turned into an xs:extension.
What I'd like to do is a
eption.
> Before this exception, I could not initialize the web service.
>
> Regards,
> Marc
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Weighill-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 12:20 PM
> To: Daniel Kulp
> Cc: cxf-user@incub
t;org.apache.cxf.interceptor.Fault: Marshalling Error:
> com.rulestream.core.knowledge.domain.MyClass is not known to this context"
> exception.
> Before this exception, I could not initialize the web service.
>
> Regards,
> Marc
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
iel Kulp wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008, Phil Weighill-Smith wrote:
> > I'm trying to apply the pattern I described earlier to my real world
> > scenario. The problem I haven't figured out a way round is when I have
> > parameters and return types based on arra
package the package;
>
>
> > * ensuring the WSDL contains appropriate documentation.
>
> THAT is something I don't know if it's possible. You'd probably have to
> ask on the JAXB list about that.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> >
> &
uch. In general, we
> definitely suggest using concrete classes.
>
> That said, one major issue is that your interface doesn't have setter
> methods on it. There's no way there's any chance of it working without
> that. JAXB would only expose properties that h
For some reason I can't get CXF 2.0.3 to generate what looks like
correct WSDL from a set of Java interfaces. I either get no XML
representing the object(s) or get an abstract complex type for the
object(s) depending on the interfaces involved.
Here's a simple example. Because I use interfaces for
17 matches
Mail list logo
