RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-23 Thread Benson Margulies
bject: RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise > > > return class is my bean class - not java class. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/SOAP-Namspace-change-in-2.0.3---Please-A > dvise-tf4772597.html#a13916358 > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-23 Thread mule1
return class is my bean class - not java class. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SOAP-Namspace-change-in-2.0.3---Please-Advise-tf4772597.html#a13916358 Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-23 Thread Benson Margulies
Hmm. What is the return type? Is it a class of yours, or a builtin Java type? > -Original Message- > From: mule1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 11:17 AM > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-23 Thread mule1
Hello, what would be all the places where I need to specify targetNamespace="" in my annotation? I currently have tried with @WebResult(name="myresultxx", targetNamespace="") and the element still comes up with 'ns'. So, not sure where else I need to have the tragetNamespace="" -- View this me

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-23 Thread Benson Margulies
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 10:03 AM > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise > > > is it possible to have the response xml document to drop the > NS prefixes with jaxb? > -- > View t

Re: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-23 Thread mule1
is it possible to have the response xml document to drop the NS prefixes with jaxb? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SOAP-Namspace-change-in-2.0.3---Please-Advise-tf4772597.html#a13913734 Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-08 Thread Benson Margulies
Ignore my comment, I should have read more code, on the subject of namespaces. > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:50 PM > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Vespa, Anthony J > Subject: Re: SOAP

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-08 Thread Benson Margulies
rom: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:03 PM > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Vespa, Anthony J > Subject: Re: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise > > > Well, yes. The two xml fragments are technically equivile

Re: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
user@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Vespa, Anthony J > Subject: Re: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise > > > Well, I know which commit caused this. (mine, revision 587274) > > Basically, previously, Aegis would ALWAYS write out a new namespace > for each part, even if

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-08 Thread Vespa, Anthony J
1 and ""? -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:50 PM To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org Cc: Vespa, Anthony J Subject: Re: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise Well, I know which commit caused this. (mine, revision 587

Re: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
Well, I know which commit caused this. (mine, revision 587274) Basically, previously, Aegis would ALWAYS write out a new namespace for each part, even if the namepace is already defined in the message. It was basically because we keyed the writing off whether the prefix in the QName is null o

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-08 Thread Vespa, Anthony J
Original Message- From: Benson Margulies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:37 PM To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise Was the old behavior unqualified elements, or more friendly namespace prefixes? There is a feat

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-08 Thread Benson Margulies
; -Original Message- > From: Vespa, Anthony J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:29 PM > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise > > We're using Aegis databinding, and the front end cli

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-08 Thread Vespa, Anthony J
ml is... -Original Message- From: Benson Margulies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:17 PM To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise What front end and data binding. > -Original Message

RE: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise

2007-11-08 Thread Benson Margulies
What front end and data binding. > -Original Message- > From: Vespa, Anthony J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 1:07 PM > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: SOAP Namspace change in 2.0.3 - Please Advise > > Hello, > > Playing with the RC for 2.0.3 h