Re: WHICH_JARS not actual

2007-08-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
will be slightly bigger but less jars I have to keep track of the better. -Original Message- From: Jiang, Ning (Willem) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 7:30 AM To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: WHICH_JARS not actual Yes ,we

Re: WHICH_JARS not actual

2007-08-03 Thread Dan Diephouse
to keep track of the better. -Original Message- From: Jiang, Ning (Willem) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 7:30 AM To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: WHICH_JARS not actual Yes ,we should update the WHICH_JARS to refelect the recent

Re: WHICH_JARS not actual

2007-08-03 Thread Gustavo Morozowski
@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: WHICH_JARS not actual Yes ,we should update the WHICH_JARS to refelect the recent changes. For the second issue, current CXF servlet only support SpringBusFactory which relates on Spring. So you have to include the Spring jars for wiring the CXF components

RE: WHICH_JARS not actual

2007-08-03 Thread Benson Margulies
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 9:37 AM To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org Cc: Gustavo Morozowski Subject: Re: WHICH_JARS not actual On Friday 03 August 2007 05:30, Gustavo Morozowski wrote: Any updates on WHICH_JARS for 2.0.1? Unforuntately, not nearly changed enough. I did add

WHICH_JARS not actual

2007-07-16 Thread Lukas Zapletal
Hello all, it seems WHICH_JARS file is not actual. CXF itself needs xml-resolver.jar and I am sure there will be other JARs that should be included in the minimal CXF install. The second issue about the libraries is that CXF depends on Spring even when I do not use it. I have created just a