From: "E.J. Totty", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "John Hurst", INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--snip--
>Page 75 quotes the case of Bowles v. Bank of England confirms that the Bill
>of Rights remains an operative statute BTW. Page 10 contains the following
>passage;
>
>"The underlying purpose
From: "John Hurst", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Page 75 quotes the case of Bowles v. Bank of England confirms that the Bill
>of Rights remains an operative statute BTW. Page 10 contains the following
>passage;
>>... cannot the 1920's set of restraints be challenged as
>>well on the grounds that the in
