From:   "John Hurst.", [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Telegrpah ISSUE 2063    Wednesday 17 January 2001

Hunting Bill 'risks constitutional clash' By Charles Clover, Environment
Editor


  THE Government's attempt to push the Hunting Bill into law using the
Parliament Act could lead to a confrontation between Parliament and the
courts, says a former Master of the Rolls. Lord Donaldson of Lymington said
yesterday that he and other senior legal experts believe that supporters of
hunting would have grounds to fight the Government in the courts if it
tried to use the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 to force a Bill into law
against the will of the House of Lords. The Commons will vote today on the
Bill in which MPs are expected overwhelmingly to back an option banning the
sport, a decision expected to be reversed in the Lords. If the Government
invoked the Parliament Acts, Lord Donaldson believes the decision would be
open to challenge because legal authorities agree that the 1949 Act was
never properly enacted, being only passed by the House of Commons. "I and
my judicial colleagues have avoided this sort of situation for years. I
don't want a collision between the courts and Parliament on this. But it is
absolutely certain if the Hunting Bill went through on this principle
(through use of the Parliament Act) that someone would object and go to the
courts to challenge it." The 1949 Act was flawed as were all Acts forced
into law because of it in recent years. He said: "This includes the War
Crimes Act, the European Elections Act, the Sexual Offences Amendment Act
and if the Government tries it, in due course the Hunting Bill." The
Government most recently used the Parliament Act to lower the gay age of
consent to 16, despite tough opposition from the Lords, led by the
Conservative, Baroness Young. On Friday, Lord Donaldson will ask peers to
back a Private Member's Bill, regularising the Parliament Acts in
constitutional law, but curbing the power of the Commons to unilaterally
alter the constitution and powers of the Lords. Professor Graham Zellick,
vice chancellor of London university, a constitutional expert cited by Lord
Donaldson in the notes to his Bill, agreed yesterday that there was a point
of constitutional law to be cleared up on the powers of the Commons to
override the Lords, arising from the 1949 Act. But he cast doubt on whether
judges would opt to adhere to this point of law in practice, thus creating
havoc for the Acts which had been passed using the Parliament Act since
1991 and causing a constitutional crisis. He said: "I think there are
strong academic arguments for questioning the validity of the 1949 Act and
therefore of legislation passed under it; arguments that would be thought
cogent to a constitutional lawyer. But I do not think that those arguments
are likely to be accepted in practice by the English courts. "It brings
into question a number of Acts of Parliament. It would create havoc in the
case in which it is challenged and it depends on nice constitutional
theories which English judges on the whole don't care for." Lord Donaldson
believes he might have considerable support for his Bill, but said that his
attempts to discover the Government's view had failed. Lord Strathclyde,
the Conservative leader in the Lords, said: "I shall be speaking on Friday
and broadly supporting what Lord Donaldson is saying about making sure the
Parliament Acts can't be used to bulldoze Bills through without proper
debate." Lord Donaldson's Bill has little chance of becoming law. The
Countryside Alliance said that a ban on hunting would be likely to lead to
extra costs for the police to carry out surveillance of rural counties. The
Association of Chief Police Officers said: "There are problems associated
with whichever option is followed, should it become law. We will have to
discuss with ministers and local authorities ways of making it work."
Anti-hunting campaigners have sent MPs a letter from film, music, fashion
and television celebrities including Chrissie Hynde, Ken Loach, Alexei
Sayle, Jenny Seagrove and Gaby Roslin. 1 December 2000: Gay age of consent
dropped to 16 after two-year battle 20 November 1998: What happens when the
Lords and the Commons disagree


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  -- Learn More. Surf Less. 
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01

Reply via email to