From: Jonathan Spencer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because the police ammunition has caused such a
high fatality rate among the invaders, they withdraw and
subsequently loose the conflict.
Country 'B' sues country 'A' in the world court
for violation of the Geneva convention.
What
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "E.J. Totty", INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have an interesting question - hypothetical as
it is: Knowing the particular laws about using certain
ammunition types, suppose nation 'A' and nation 'B' go
to war -- against each other.
Both are
From: "E.J. Totty", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's no doubt about it - if the Home Office claims to
comply with the Hague Accords, but then sanctions JSP
ammo for police which is designed to expand (even if in
practice it doesn't), then it is in breach. It would be
much better advised to state that
From: Nick Steadman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's no doubt about it - if the Home Office claims to
comply with the Hague Accords, but then sanctions JSP
ammo for police which is designed to expand (even if in
practice it doesn't), then it is in breach. It would be
much better advised to state
