From: "Richard Loweth", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wasn't saying or equating murder or rape with hunting, just pointing out
that it does not help the pro-hunting argument to state that if you have not
taken part, or witnessed an event or happening (in their case a hunt) that
you cannot have a
From: "matthew.wright7", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wooahh! Come on to be fair Richard this is a bit out of order re what the
lady said in her post. I've never been pistol shooting but I made sure I
understood the issues from those that did before I formed a view. If I
didn't shoot I wouldn't be
From: Margarita Booker, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stuart wrote
"So I won't be put off from joining the Countryside Alliance march
by imagined threats of retaliation. The reason I won't be going is
because I'm opposed to fox hunting. You do what you think's right."
The problem with the bill
From: "Richard Loweth", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do not know if Stuart has seen a hunt, and a kill, or not. But has he to
have seen a rape or a murder before he can be "qualified" pronounce on
whether he personally finds the idea of those two acts wrong?
Cybershooters website:
