From: andrew, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't understand: are you saying that if the rifle in the article had
a proof mark that it wouldn't have been destroyed? Do you have
supporting evidence for this? The writer clearly places the blame on the
ammunition anyway.
Historically the purpose of
From: "E.J. Totty", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Worth a look, even to remind us all of the need for proofing
http://communities.prodigy.net/sportsrec/gz-762d.html
Tom C
Steve, Tom,
I wonder if the bullet was ever recovered?
Also, it would seem that maybe the
From: "Tom Charnock", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Worth a look, even to remind us all of the need for proofing
http://communities.prodigy.net/sportsrec/gz-762d.html
Tom C
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
