Hi Robert
Thanks for your reply. However, I do not want to compile from source -
there is no need for that. All I would like to do is include XFree86,
Tk800.23.1 and Tk:Filedialog in my cygwin distribution, plus a few perl
utilities I wrote myself.
At present this involves several steps:
1. U
Elizabeth Barham wrote:
> It's one thing for an EULA to say, "You may have one copy of this
> piece of software running on at most one computer at any time," but
> another thing for it to say what I can use the software for.
Welcome to the brave new world where laws are written by
media-congl
> -Original Message-
> From: hugo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> setup.exe script: I cannot customize it as it is binary code.
On this page (http://cygwin.com/lists.html) the location of the source
is documented.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Hi
I am re-posting this question as, although I got an answer, it didn't
quite resolve my problem.
I would like create a customized version of cygwin which includes Perl
TK, some perl utilities of my own, some other extras like Tk::FileDialog
and the like. I would like to be able to package tha
In w2k advanced server (Service Pack 2), i have local
drive c:, d:, e:, f:. In cygwin, the default mount :
d:\cygwin\bin on /usr/bin type system (binmode)
d:\cygwin on /usr/lib type system (binmode)
c:\ on /cygdrive/c type system (textmode)
d:\ on /cygdrive/d type system (textmode)
e:\ on /c
Have mercy upon me please.OK I'll come clean. This was so long ago (18 mos)
that I don't really remember what exactly happened. But I do know that it
didn't work. I have the old Cygwin CD package which I bought from Cygwin.
I took the one I downloaded and installed from Redhat and removed it.
Got you. I don't recall if a reboot was necessary. All I remember was that
the Cygwin installation didn't work. I then rebooted hoping then it would
work. It didn't I BSOD'd. Now that was in Windows 2000 Professional which
is doing very well now thank you. I was going to put Cygwin in Window
Hi, I'm a Windoze/DOS maven and just want to use WGET. With the =
exception of rudimentary FTP commands, I am a complete UNIX neophyte. I =
have installed the default version of Cygwin today and am trying to run =
WGET -h from an NT 4.0 CMD prompt. All I get is an error telling me it =
can't find
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:17:20AM +0200, Serge Koganovitsch wrote:
>I would like to download some mbox-formatted archives of 2001 and 2000
>but apparently the links do not work ! Can someone please fix this ?
It should be fixed now. Sorry about that.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwi
At 04:25 PM 4/19/2002, Matt Minnis wrote:
>Larry,
>
>I did an nm -C and collected the output to a text file.
>I found references to these functions in libc, libg, and libcygwin.
>I am not quite sure what to look for now.
>Can you explain what I need to be looking for?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Matt
>
>At 02:2
A variation of the famous "Nigerian internet investment scam"
http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/strategy/nls.asp
Note the average return promised as reported by the FBI is 30%, since this
one only offers 20%, you can find better scam promises... shop around :-)
Bruce Williams
"Two is not equal to three, e
>
> And what is this EULA anyway? I..
The "smoking gun" on the future intentions issue of the states lawsuit ,
IMHO :-)
Bruce Williams
Microsoft is sort of a mixture between the Borg and the
Ferengi. Combine the Borg marketing with Ferengi networking...
This whole thing seems kind of iffy in regards to Microsoft's
position. While Microsoft has some authority, consumers do too and
Windows XP's EULA may violate some consumer rights (I don't know of
any off hand, though). But even if it doesn't violate any at the
moment, it violates what I consider
Another issue is the number of clients served by a windows host running cygwin.
I remember that was an issue for O'Reilly for the web server they used to sell
for Windows - non-server versions of Windows were only licensed to serve a few
clients of any sort, and server versions of windows tha
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:19:01 +1000 Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Cliff Hones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 11:55 PM
> The download process iterates over all known packages, and calls
> download_one for the binar
> The following excerpt is from Brian Livingston's 'Windows Manager'
> column, 18Mar2002:
> http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/02/03/18/020318oplivingston.xml
>
> I'm wondering if, in addition to possibly forbidding the use of VNC,
> this might also forbid installing Cygwin on WinXP and then
BUSINESS PROPOSAL.
ATTN:
I know it's quite astonishing when a business proposal comes from an
unknown person whom you do not know or have in anyway come in contact
with.I got your address from the chambers of commerce and Industries
here in the Netherlands,due to the co
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Hones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 11:55 PM
> It seems then that the buggy behaviour is present on W9X NT and W2K
but not XP. Since the majority of Cygwin users do not
> use XP (yet) I'd suggest that it would be a good i
Not wanting to put salt an open wound...just commenting...fact is, Cygwin can not
cause BSOD. Only OS can
regurgitate BSODs.
Also, if you had checked memory dumps, you would probably know it had nothing
to do with Cygwin.
Probably had something to do with a faulty (pirated?) version
Hi,
I would like to download some mbox-formatted archives of 2001 and 2000
but apparently the links do not work ! Can someone please fix this ?
TIA,
Serge
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
Wrong mailing list. Redirected.
cgf
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 09:12:15PM +0200, Ton van Overbeek wrote:
>Below a copy of my message to the insight mailing-list.
>(cc: to cygwin-apps did not work due to typing error in address)
>---
>
cgf worte:
> ...
> I appreciate your (Cliff) letting people know about your experiences
> with Norton on XP. ...
Actually it was with NT4SP6. And I can't be sure that it was a
bug in the Symantic/Norton code, as the system had been 'repaired'
and the Norton s/w was rather old. But it does illus
> > > > In the cygwin-apps I have seen some messages
> > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-01/msg00340.html about
a
> > > killall
> > > > util, which was going to be part of the cygutils packages but was
waiting
> > > > because of licensing problems.
> > > >
> > > > For killall I'm
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 15:25:27 -0500, "Matt Minnis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Larry,
>
>I did an nm -C and collected the output to a text file.
>I found references to these functions in libc, libg, and libcygwin.
>I am not quite sure what to look for now.
>Can you explain what I need to be lookin
I'll spend a little time and try to fix it up. Generally, lpr has worked for my
original intent, but when I wrote it, I never intended to publish it. I posted
the source a year or two ago in respose to someone's printing question, and was
very surprised when Chuck asked for permission to include i
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:48:12PM +0100, Cliff Hones wrote:
>>It wasn't setup that BSOD'd the op sys it was rebooting after the
>>setup. Jeeze! And please if you want to give me the old "screw you"
>>that doesn't help any. You may think my op sys is hanging on by it's
>>IDE cable and if so that
Forwarding to the correct mailing list.
cgf
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:15:25PM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>>>ld checks the symbols in the shared libs during compile time to see if
>>>it can resolve all symbols and appearantly also detects duplicated
>>>symbols. On Linux it is not necassery imp
>
> > > In the cygwin-apps I have seen some messages
> > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-01/msg00340.html about a
> > killall
> > > util, which was going to be part of the cygutils packages but was waiting
> > > because of licensing problems.
> > >
> > > For killall I'm using a goo
Robert,
It seems then that the buggy behaviour is present on W9X NT and
W2K but not XP. Since the majority of Cygwin users do not use XP
(yet) I'd suggest that it would be a good idea for some setup.exe
developers to have access to a variety of systems to help avoid
and debug this sort of proble
> It wasn't setup that BSOD'd the op sys it was rebooting after the setup.
> Jeeze! And please if you want to give me the old "screw you" that doesn't
> help any. You may think my op sys is hanging on by it's IDE cable and if so
> that's your call. I cannot believe you suggested installing a
No, Microsoft in it's wisdom loads workstations with tons of insecure
'server-type' code... and we are talking services ran by default! The users
are considered 'too dumb' to do more than point and click, but they are
supposed to config all this crap if they don't want to become anybodies
zombie..
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Doug Wyatt
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 3:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Is Cygwin legal under Windows XP?
>
>
>
>
> > You wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > in gmane.os.cygwin on Sun,
You wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in gmane.os.cygwin on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 20:34:16 +1000:
> IIS runs just fine here (XP Pro). It also runs fine on NT 4 workstation
> and 2000 workstation.
Huh? I thought it'd only run on the "Server" version. That shows how
much /I/ know!
--
Sam Edge
--
Unsubsc
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Edge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 8:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Is Cygwin legal under Windows XP?
>
>
> You wrote in <3CC24897.10238.884BE175@localhost>
> in gmane.os.cygwin on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:05:27 -05
You wrote in <3CC24897.10238.884BE175@localhost>
in gmane.os.cygwin on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:05:27 -0500:
> Or, Web servers which download Java, Javascript and ASP's.
Download is okay - the code is running on the remote machine and needs
a local (Java/.NET/ActiveX/WSH) licence to run there.
I th
> You wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> in gmane.os.cygwin on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:54:01 +0200:
>
> > > Microsoft's XP license agreement says, "Except as otherwise permitted
> > > by the NetMeeting, Remote Assistance, and Remote Desktop features
> > > described below, you may not use the Product to
You wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in gmane.os.cygwin on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:54:01 +0200:
> > Microsoft's XP license agreement says, "Except as otherwise permitted
> > by the NetMeeting, Remote Assistance, and Remote Desktop features
> > described below, you may not use the Product to permit any De
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 6:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug in setup.exe 2.194.2.24
>
>
> Hallo Robert,
>
> > And I *stil* cannot reproduce it. Setup detects the local
> files *every
> > s
Hallo Robert,
> And I *stil* cannot reproduce it. Setup detects the local files *every
> single time*.
what system are you on?
I have problems on Win2000 and WinNT4.
Say, you *install* everything you need from the release using the 'current'
(default setting) including some packages where a 'te
It wasn't setup that BSOD'd the op sys it was rebooting after the setup.
Jeeze! And please if you want to give me the old "screw you" that doesn't
help any. You may think my op sys is hanging on by it's IDE cable and if so
that's your call. I cannot believe you suggested installing a Norton
pro
Hallo Doug,
> The following excerpt is from Brian Livingston's 'Windows Manager'
> column, 18Mar2002:
> http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/02/03/18/020318oplivingston.xml
> I'm wondering if, in addition to possibly forbidding the use of VNC,
> this might also forbid installing Cygwin on Wi
It ain't me man wha!
--
George Hester
_
"Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > ROTFLMAO
> >
> > George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
>
42 matches
Mail list logo
