-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CVS changed?
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 10:32:18AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
This has -suddenyl- started happening:
This should
So linking by ordinal only will help you a little. rebinding and
rebasing your .dll's will help much much more.
.. which has to be analysed. Has anyone a working bind app ?
One could be found at
http://www.geocities.com/shewitt_au/speedload_files/speedload.html
Ralf
Here is the solution :
/usr/bin rebase -d -b 0x6800 -o 0x1
/usr/local/apache/libexec/standard/mod_mime_magic.dll
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Olivier Delrieu
Envoyé : dim. 28 avril 2002 18:23
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet :
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:22:19PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Just a minor error, but it still contains You must have installed the
zlib, openssl and regex packages to be able to build OpenSSH! at its end.
Thanks for the hint. I'll change that when 3.2p1 gets released.
Corinna
--
Corinna
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:35:31PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/ucl-1.01-1-src.tar.bz2
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/ucl-1.01-1.tar.bz2
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/upx-1.20-1-src.tar.bz2
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/upx-1.20-1.tar.bz2
@ ucl
sdesc: The UCL compression and
Setup should now reliably cross compile or natively compile OOTB.
Enjoy.
Rob
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:36:49PM +0200, Teun Burgers wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
Looks good to me -- with these caveats:
1) /etc/postinstall/gnugo.sh is not included in your binary tarball.
2) /usr/doc/Cygwin/gnugo-3.2.README is not included in your binary
tarball.
3) In the
Robert Collins wrote:
Setup should now reliably cross compile or natively compile OOTB.
Can I configure it from CVS without the autotools installed yet?
PLEASE, put the autotools created files there!
Earnie.
I've used the redownload feature to reget a corrupted downloaded file.
Not often, but it's worth saving the functionality.
Earnie.
Robert Collins wrote:
Ok. Time for a straw poll.
Please write back (to me or the list, your choice) whether you use the
DELIBERATE 'download again'
===
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: 'redownload' aka download again and cygwin setup
I've used the redownload feature to reget a
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 06:04:55PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
But everyone will complain if they can't run the package after they install
it. I think we should absolutely avoid the latter case. The former
we can deal with as required.
What's
===
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Collins wrote:
Setup should now reliably cross compile or natively compile OOTB.
Can I configure it from CVS without the autotools installed yet?
PLEASE, put the autotools
Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: 'redownload' aka download again and cygwin setup
I've used the
===
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, I simply want to get the latest versions from CVS and configure
and
make. I don't want the autotools installed.
Why do you want to get these versions from CVS? I'm really trying to
===
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: 'redownload' aka download again and cygwin setup
Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original
Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, I simply want to get the latest versions from CVS and configure
and
make. I don't want the autotools installed.
Why do you want to get these
I'd like to move the setup.ini format description out of
www.cygwin.com/setup.html to sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html.
Quoting from the www.cygwin.com/setup.html This section is for
completeness, not instruction. It's more appropriate for the developer
area.
Any objections?
Rob
For Clarity: I meant the or to be an exclusive or - that is that we
should choose only one of the formats..
Rob
===
- Original Message -
From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:28 PM
Subject: RFC: setup.ini change
I'd like to change
I would like to contribute fetchmail and procmail to the standard Cygwin
distribution. The following are the setup.hint files:
# $Id: setup.hint,v 1.1 2002/04/29 13:24:58 jt Exp $
sdesc: Remote mail retrieval and forwarding utility
ldesc: Fetchmail is a remote mail retrieval and forwarding
One could be found at
http://www.geocities.com/shewitt_au/speedload_files/speedload.html
I have tried to rebind ld created apps and applications with this and a self
written rebind app and got a problem.
rebind does only patch the first IAT entry, if the dll is created with ld. The
others
===
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Binutils [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Cygwin-Apps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:00 AM
Subject: RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld
One could be found at
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 09:11:22PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
There have been a number of source changes made during the location
transition.
I'd like to do a new release of setup to get that code 'out there'...
plus there are a few (minor) bugfixes.
Chris - is that ok with you?
Fine with
At 07:44 AM 4/29/2002, Earnie Boyd wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 06:04:55PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
But everyone will complain if they can't run the package after they install
it. I think we should absolutely avoid the latter case. The
Chris,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:41:11AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 09:50:01AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
If I get approval for the above packages, then I will write-up README
files and package the tarballs according to the Package Source Method
1 style.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:33:34PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
8) What's the big deal with adding a few files to the CVS?
It's a PITA. Diffs get bigger, Changelogs get garbage 'Makefile.in:
Regenerated.' entries. And when developers have different autotool
versions, committing becomes a PITA
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:04:56AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
You're also a masochist. :-)
Uh oh! Why? Should I run away now, while I still have a chance? :,)
How do I use fetchmail with Outlook?
I can't use procmail with our lotus notes server!!! What's the deal???
Fetchmail hangs when
Given the way that md5 checksums are generated on sourceware currently,
this would be a problem. The checksums are generated asynchronously
with the creation of setup.ini.
I would prefer the three column version of install/source, though.
Slightly less work for me.
cgf
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at
Robert schrieb:
With the ability to generate -src snapshots, I can now make setup.exe
-src tarballs easily. I'd like to package up a -src only package with
the current released setup sources in 'curr', and (possibly) any new
versions in 'test'. For now I don't intend to offer binary
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
At 07:44 AM 4/29/2002, Earnie Boyd wrote:
-8-
The point is, the extra path walks are
expensive.
Quite true. But I would say that Corinna's suggestion, from a strict
technical perspective, makes netpbm in a different bin directory usable
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 05:43:30PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Robert schrieb:
With the ability to generate -src snapshots, I can now make setup.exe
-src tarballs easily. I'd like to package up a -src only package with
the current released setup sources in 'curr', and (possibly) any new
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 06:04:55PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
But everyone will complain if they can't run the package after they install
it. I think we should absolutely avoid the latter case. The former
we can deal with as required.
What's
a self
written rebind app and got a problem.
rebind does only patch the first IAT entry, if the dll is created with
ld. The
others are set to zero
Rebinding for example the cygwin1.dll to some natvie windows apps
works, so this
seems to be an ld incompatiblity.
Does
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:12:29AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:04:56AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
You're also a masochist. :-)
Uh oh! Why? Should I run away now, while I still have a chance? :,)
How do I use fetchmail with Outlook?
I can't use
At 07:16 PM 4/29/2002, Lapo Luchini wrote:
install: release/bash/bash-2901.tar.bz2 276403
158044165a04791968a7e7fc8daaef9e
source: release/bash/bash-2901-src.tar.bz2 1892899
158044165a04791968a7e7fc8daaef9f
Any preference folk?
Why don't directly inline? (filename length md5sum)
Thats what I had typed, outlook wrapped the lines.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: setup.ini change
install: release/bash/bash-2901.tar.bz2 276403
At 05:08 PM 4/29/2002, Harold Hunt wrote:
I've created Cygwin setup.exe packages for the X11 window managers
WindowMaker and Openbox. I have tentatively put them in
release/XFree86/WindowMaker and release/XFree86/openbox... is that a good
idea? Or, should I give each X package a toplevel
I've created Cygwin setup.exe packages for the X11 window managers
WindowMaker and Openbox. I have tentatively put them in
release/XFree86/WindowMaker and release/XFree86/openbox... is that a good
idea? Or, should I give each X package a toplevel directory in release/?
Harold
I've uploaded a snapshot (bin src) that detects corrupt files based on
md5. It's backward compatible with the current .ini format.
The code needs reorganising before I commit it, this is simply for folk
to play and test with.
There is -no- UI change at this point. The md5 corruption is
I just noticed today that if I run XWin -help, I don't see anything at the
command-line. I have to go look in /tmp/XWin.log to see the results.
Would it make send to print this information to STERR instead of the log
file?
_
Richard,
Hmm... you mention that you can see the directory with your browser... that
means that your browser has a connection open to my ftp server... and I'm
not sure how many connections my server allows per host. Thus, you may want
to close your browser, wait a few minutes, then open
Harold,
still no luck. we need another data point to isolate the problem .. somebody else
needs to try to point setup.exe to that location...
-rich
Harold Hunt wrote:
Richard,
Hmm... you mention that you can see the directory with your browser... that
means that your browser has a
Aha. I see now that man XWin and man Xserver are a preferable
alternative to Xwin -help anyway.
From: Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: XWin -help behavior
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:44:36 -0400
Sam,
Thanks, I forgot that point.
Harold
-Original
Eugene,
Thanks for the confirmation.
WindowMaker is working OK. Had a glitch in the beginning. I could not see
wmaker in /usr/local where all other window managers I have compiled (or
tried to compile) live (openbox, blackbox, icewm). I tried to run it from
the command line and got a dialog
When I try to start wmaker I get the eerror CYGJPEG6B.DLL not found. I
checked that this file indeed is not in my \cygwin directory. Which
package is it supposed to come in?
Openbox works great.
Lars.
--
Lars Jensen, TMCC/Vista B200, 7000 Dandini Blvd, Reno NV 89512-3999.
Internet: [EMAIL
Lars,
You've gotta start wmaker via some script that sets your paths correctly.
The startxwin.bat or startxwin.sh scripts do this.
You can't just run wmaker from any old command line.
Harold
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 12:26:10PM -0700, Lars Jensen wrote:
Harold,
Did you read more than the subject title of my posting? ;-)
The message states that cygjpeg6b.dll is not in my \cygwin directory tree
at all. Further I am using startxwin.bat to start wmaker!
Where does the cygjpeg.dll come
Lars,
Yeah, I read it. But I read it as, I checked and cygjpeg6b.dll IS in my
/cygwin directory.
No need to get pissy.
Harold
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars Jensen
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:26 PM
To: Harold Hunt
Cc:
Harold,
I guess a crucial not was missing. -Anyhow, it was only meant as a
joke. I hope you didn't take any offense.
Anyway, where does cygjpeg6b.dll come from?
Lars.
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Harold Hunt wrote:
Lars,
Yeah, I read it. But I read it as, I checked and cygjpeg6b.dll IS in my
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 12:59:52PM -0700, Lars Jensen wrote:
I guess a crucial not was missing. -Anyhow, it was only meant as a
joke. I hope you didn't take any offense.
Anyway, where does cygjpeg6b.dll come from?
Wow. This thread is getting painful now.
cgf
Dawson, David W wrote:
Goodness!!
cygjpeg6b.dll is part of the jpeg package of Cygwin.
WindowMaker depends upon this package.
As noted in another post, WindowMaker also depends on the tiff package.
Now that it has become evident that WindowMaker also needs these
(non-default)
At 05:08 PM 4/29/2002, Harold Hunt wrote:
I've created Cygwin setup.exe packages for the X11 window managers
WindowMaker and Openbox. I have tentatively put them in
release/XFree86/WindowMaker and release/XFree86/openbox... is that a good
idea? Or, should I give each X package a toplevel
I've created Cygwin setup.exe packages for the X11 window managers
WindowMaker and Openbox. I have tentatively put them in
release/XFree86/WindowMaker and release/XFree86/openbox... is that a good
idea? Or, should I give each X package a toplevel directory in release/?
Harold
What could prohibit the SSHD to start at boot-time?
Is there some form of dependency?
Please have a look in the mail archives:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Acygwin.com+sshd+service+dependency
Your sshd probably needs a dependency on other services; the names
aren't obvious to the
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But setup.exe has operated in the correct way in the past! Why write a
new tool,
when fixing a bug in the current one would do all that needs to be
done?
Because the current tool is more complex than
Don, i'm sorry about being such a pain but i have googled for a bit with no
luck :-(
on my status i dont get the remaining blocks, only the total capacity. i
then did a status 3 which tells me that reports remaining is set to no.
so i'm assuming i have this option disabled. i couldnt find no info
Ok. Time for a straw poll.
Please write back (to me or the list, your choice) whether you use the
DELIBERATE 'download again' functionality of setup.exe or not.
And if so, how often and for what purpose.
This is to determine if certain functionality that -in essence- causes
the 'accidental'
===
- Original Message -
From: Cliff Hones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now Sam Edge is taking the same path. Good luck.
What would happen if someone did produce a version of setup identical
to the current, except for the removal of redownload? Would it
be adopted?
Eric,
Attached is a patch (against fetchmail 5.9.11) that works around the
Microsoft Winsock recv/WSARecv(..., MSG_PEEK) problem that I originally
post to fetchmail-friends in:
http://lists.ccil.org/pipermail/fetchmail-friends/2001-August/000906.html
This patch is essentially the same as
Robert Collins wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in gmane.os.cygwin on Mon, 29 Apr 2002 17:47:16 +1000:
The *redownloading* is a bug, and will get fixed.
Okay. Good.
The 'I want to mirror
non-installed packages by using download' is not.
Actually, the re-download fix would go 90% of the way to
Robert Collins wrote in 00bd01c1ef6f$590b36c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks
in gmane.os.cygwin on Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:16:44 +1000:
Please write back (to me or the list, your choice) whether you use the
DELIBERATE 'download again' functionality of setup.exe or not.
I've not used it but then I've not
===
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: 'redownload' aka download again and cygwin setup
Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. Time for a straw poll.
Please write back (to me or the list, your choice) whether you use the
DELIBERATE 'download again' functionality of setup.exe or not.
And if so, how often and for what purpose.
This is to determine if certain functionality
- Original Message -
From: Sam Edge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A 'normal' install - download and install - works fine, no problems.
Read my and Christopher Faylor's posts especially
[EMAIL PROTECTED] where we explain where for some
people download and install with the
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nooo! I used that to download stuff that I don't want installed.
You will still be able to do that. I'm talking about removing
'REdownload. DOWNLOAD will stay.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info:
When I downloaded the binaries for tin from
ftp://ftp.tin.org/pub/news/clients/tin/stable/tin-current.tar.gz and tried
to execute it, I get the following message:
Can't get a (fully-qualified) domain-name!
Try and save newsrc file again? (y/n): y
I followed the directions and
Has Anyone used Fox Gui (http://www.fox-toolkit.org/) + OpenGL here.
The compilation doesnt give any problems but when I run OpenGL test
programs , it exits without saying anything. I asked in the FOX-users
group and havent got any results yet, Anyone here who has ever installed
Fox on his
Craveiro, Marco wrote:
Don, i'm sorry about being such a pain but i have googled for a bit with no
luck :-(
on my status i dont get the remaining blocks, only the total capacity. i
then did a status 3 which tells me that reports remaining is set to no.
so i'm assuming i have this option
Hi List
Am I the only one who just received a spam mail through this list
containing Gay video offers ;o)
Can we do anything about the spam mail?
Jacob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
Sorry. Should have read more carefully.
In the unlikely event that a tarball is corrupted, yet still the exact same
size, I think it is probably reasonable to expect the user to manually delete
the broken tarball.
So, no objections to that feature going.
Max.
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Jacob,
you're not alone, I have also received a spam mail (same that you have
received) through this list.
Mit freundlichem Grüßen / best regards
Edgar Rainer Berberich
---
Services Dezentral / PC Server Systeme
Telefon:
Besten Dank für Ihre Anfrage.
NEWS!!! NEWS!!! NEWS!!!
NEU EINGETROFFEN:
UNSER NEUER SCHNÄPPCHENKATALOG IST DA!
Bestellen Sie diesen
I am trying to port a unix application that runs fine on linux (and many
other unix variants), but under cygwin dies quickly and gives the message
segmentation fault, core dumped. When I run it under gdb, the application
doesn't crash immediately, but runs for some time before either 1) gdb says
Robert Collins wrote in 016301c1ef7b$4d769f00$0200a8c0@lifelesswks
in gmane.os.cygwin on Mon, 29 Apr 2002 22:42:18 +1000:
Actually, the current functionality wil do the trick, as long as you
install what you have downloaded.
Hmmm. I've just tried using install from Internet with bzip2,
Please check out the project web page for links to available information
and ports: http://cygwin.com/ .
If you don't see what you need there, then the cygwin mailing list is
the best place to make observations or get questions answered.
Information on the mailing list is available at the
Rob,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 04:11:45AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
the files that don't link being rebound...
Do you mean rebase instead of rebound above?
do they have INT's
(Import Name Tables?) that are fully valid (no auto-import tricks etc
etc)?
I believe so, but how do I
On Monday 29 April 2002 06:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jacob,
you're not alone, I have also received a spam mail (same that you have
received) through this list.
Mit freundlichem Grüßen / best regards
Edgar Rainer Berberich
daffy,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:25:04AM +0200, daffy wrote:
I find thanks to google your effort to compile Postix under cygwin.
Please post instead of sending private email.
Is it fully fonctionable ?
Where can i get your patch ...
Thanks for replying supporting
By the above, are you
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:42:18PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Checkbox's, command line options, and 'special case code' and the
redownload itself are all kludges around fixing the key problem.
That's for sure. The design that I proposed for setup's UI eliminated
most of these.
cgf
--
Jacob schrieb:
Am I the only one who just received a spam mail through this list
containing Gay video offers ;o)
I'm sure you're not the only one...
Can we do anything about the spam mail?
http://no.sp.am/
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 03:04:44PM +0200, Jacob Vennervald Madsen wrote:
Hi List
Am I the only one who just received a spam mail through this list
containing Gay video offers ;o)
Can we do anything about the spam mail?
Yes, you can not contribute to the spam by sending messages to mailing
This is a follow-up to the thread Wierdness of WSASendTo()??
from a few weeks ago:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-04/msg00675.html
I have been looking into porting Unix traceroute to Win32/Cygwin.
The thread above discusses problems sending raw packets using
a SOCK_RAW socket, Win2k
Objet : C'était un poisson !
Nous sommes le 1er avril (ou presque) ! Le mail étrange que vous avez reçu
était un poisson d'avril, monté par un de vos amis avec la complicité du
site Linternaute.com.
Nous espérons que la frayeur (ou le désagrément) n'ont pas été trop grands.
Recevez par avance
Actually, this is a better set of options: we don't need to preserve
owner, groups, or devices, and the modify-window helps with the limited
timestamp granularity of the FAT filesystem. Remember to fix LOCALDIR
and remove --dry-run.
-
#!/bin/sh
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED RESPONSE -- PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE
Thank you for your reply.
If you have a question or comment, please send an email to the
AllBusiness Member Relation Department at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you would like to be removed from the AllBusiness Solutions mailing
84 matches
Mail list logo
