Hi
The gdb tty option and command is broken on cygwin. After setting a tty
for the inferior, the first run seems OK, but the second sometimes fails
and the third may cause gdb to hang or enter an infinite loop. The fix
is to close the (redundant) tty fd *before* launching the inferior
process inste
In the current setup.ini (timestamp 1041225613) guile-1.5.6-5 is marked as
[prev] for all three of @guile, @guile-devel and @guile-doc. But it is
presumed [curr] as the source for @libguile14.
(I found this while fiddling around trying to reduce [curr] + [prev] +
[test] to fit on one CD.)
It seem
Min Kim wrote:
> Max,
>
> You're a genius. I did have Viruscan 7 installed but not the firewall.
> Everything works perfectly now with it uninstalled. I guess I'll have
> to go with Norton Antivirus. There isn't by chance a workaround for
> the McAfee Viruscan problem, is there?
I'm afraid not. As
John,
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 07:26:51PM -0700, John Purser wrote:
> Is anyone out there using the Python curses library or do you know of
> a good tutorial for it?
> [snip]
> Any resources for me out there?
I recommend posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I think that you will
have better luck there.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the current setup.ini (timestamp 1041225613) guile-1.5.6-5 is marked as
> [prev] for all three of @guile, @guile-devel and @guile-doc. But it is
> presumed [curr] as the source for @libguile14.
*guile*-1.6.0-1 (is curr and) should be used for all purposes.
> It s
Chris,
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 06:02:02PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> How have you managed to build cygwin in the past?
By leveraging off of the following patch:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5470&atid=305470&func=detail&aid=443669
and installing the required headers.
BTW
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 11:18:55PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
If somebody with a debuggable cygwin kernel could look into this, I'd
appreciate it. I'll try to follow up on my own, but it takes FOREVER to
do a 'cvs update' on the cygwin source tree over a 28.8k mode
Jason Tishler wrote:
I should have been more clear. I was reacting to the "cyg" not the lack
of a period. For example, in 8.0 we had libtcl80.a, in 8.3 now we have
libcygtk83.a. This name change is another reason why the above patch
needs to be reworked.
I'm not really willing to arbitrar
I've updated the version of exim to 4.12
(exim is a Mail Transfer Agent, like sendmail).
4.12 is the first stable release since the current 4.10.
It contains 54 backward compatible changes to exim proper, see
ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/ChangeLogs/NewStuff-4.11
There are al
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: expect-20021218-1, gdb-20021218-1,
tcltk-20021218-1
> Chris,
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 06:02:02PM -0500, Christopher F
Since this is a general inquiry without any specifics, I assume you're
looking for a general confirmation that linking against MS DLLs is
possible. I can attest to that. Generally speaking, when you run into
unresolved symbols, you need to find the DLLs/import libraries or static
libraries which
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 07:50:59AM -0800, Robert Bercik wrote:
>I'm trying to create a cygwin dll that links to a microsoft DLL.
>However, when I try and link to the DLL, the linkerl complains that the
>symbols contained in the microsoft DLL are still unresolved. I used
>the nm command on the DLL
Hello Xperts,
Wish U a Very appy New Year
karthik bala guru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV.
visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com
--
Unsubscribe info: ht
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:00:37AM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
>I will gladly help with any Cygwin TCL / TK issues in any way I can
>short of becoming the 'official' maintainer for which I do not feel
>qualified given their critical role with respect to 'Insight' and 'gdb'
And I am? All it requires
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 09:43:50AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Did gcc (pre 3.2) automatically initialize data to 0, while gcc-3.2 does
>not? Hmmm...waitaminute, I do have gcc2 installed...
If gcc/ld is not initializing static data to zero then there are some
pretty serious problems. Neither
Thanks for the clarification. I'm a seasoned programmer but have not
worked on GNU. If you can give me some pointer perhaps I can help.
(Better than trial-and-error all day :).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Christopher Faylor
Sent: Monda
Chuck,
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 09:48:07AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> >OK. I just wanted to check before I submitted my patch to the Python
> >patch collector.
>
> Since the config scripts (/usr/lib/tclConfig.sh, /usr/lib/tkConfig.sh)
> seem to be accurate now, is there
Hi,
I am trying to link to a proprietary dll and I'm
so damn close I
can almost taste the sweet sweet linkage. But i got a
little error.
It's says it cannot find some symbols and therefore
the export fails?
Maybe you guys can help clarify,
heres' what gcc says:
make files.dll
make[1]: Ent
I have downloaded the Tcl/Tk 8.3.4 package
which was released with patches to compile
under the cygwin C compiler for Windows OS,
available from http://cygwin.com/ported.html
For the most part this works except it
seems to work better using the init.tcl
file that comes with the Scriptics Tk 8.3.4
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 04:05:17PM -0500, Joseph wrote:
>I have downloaded the Tcl/Tk 8.3.4 package which was released with
>patches to compile under the cygwin C compiler for Windows OS,
>available from http://cygwin.com/ported.html
>
>For the most part this works except it seems to work better us
Hi Folks,
Does this jog anyone's memory?
New XP SP1 install, new cygwin install (full)
Quirk #1:
When I launch Emacs, I get this scratch buffer popping
up which reads:
** ad-Orig-documentation called with 5 arguments, but
accepts only 1-2
Then, I notice that apropos is broken. For example,
i
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 09:43:50AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Did gcc (pre 3.2) automatically initialize data to 0, while gcc-3.2 does
not? Hmmm...waitaminute, I do have gcc2 installed...
If gcc/ld is not initializing static data to zero then there are some
pretty
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 11:45, Charles Wilson wrote:
> [...but I can't reproduce the fault on linux. Even if I link in
> dlmalloc. Bleah. ElectricFence on linux couldn't find anything
> suspicious either.]
You might try valgrind. valgrind is *good*.
Happy New Year.
Rob
--
---
GPG key availa
Is there a convert utility for graphics conversion in cygwin? I tried
looking on website and came up empty.
Thanks,
Wes
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
try http://www.google.com
It's a search engine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Wes Szumera
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 8:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: convert utility
Is there a convert utility for graphics conversion in cygw
Robert,
Yes, I know what google is. Between www.google.com and
groups.google.com, I tend to find most of what I want to get a line
on.
What caused me a problem in searching, is that convert is a rather
common word. From what I was told by an acquainance on a non
computer list, imagine that
Hello,
I'm gnu-tarring files with tar version 1.13.25
on solaris, then untarring with the same version
on cygwin. The files are dated 2002-12-31 18:09:xx
in the tgz on solaris. When I sftp them to cygwin,
the tar programs shows the files to be dated
2003-01-01 03:09.xx. But typing "date" at the
Shing-Fat Fred Ma wrote:
Hello,
I'm gnu-tarring files with tar version 1.13.25
on solaris, then untarring with the same version
on cygwin. The files are dated 2002-12-31 18:09:xx
in the tgz on solaris. When I sftp them to cygwin,
the tar programs shows the files to be dated
2003-01-01 03:09.xx
28 matches
Mail list logo
