Brian Ford wrote:
I get the following error repeatedly in 1.3.19 when I try to use thread
priorities and pthread_condition_signal:
128327 [unknown (0x9D8)] vital 3032 pthread_cond::Signal: Released too
many threads - 1 now 1 originally
Any idea what the problem is? I will continue trying to track
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 11:28, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> Yes. It would be nice if there were such easily accessable and promently
> displayed things on the Cygwin site.
I'll repeat the offer I made last time this wish was expressed: If you
will maintain it, I am happy for you do so, on the cygwin si
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 10:02, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote
>
> > And, different agendas as well. No one in free software has to work on
> > things that they don't want to work on.
> >
> > And, the theory that "You know how to do it. You're doing all this
> > other stuff, why d
--- Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DH wrote:
> > --- Pavel Tsekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, DH wrote:
> >>
> >>> For the love of open source,
> >>> is the setup.exe dialog listing the
> >>> packages ever going to get bigger?
> >>>
> >>> I've searched the mailing
When I libtoolize with libtool-devel-20030216, I can't build dll's that I was able to
build with libtool-devel-20030103. When linking with 20030216 I get messages such
as these:
*** Warning: linker path does not have real file for library -lcygwin.
*** I have the capability to make that library au
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:45:12PM -0500, Dao, Giathang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to apply a diff patch to a tree of files containing binaries and windows
> text files.
> The binaries are patched correctly but the newlines in the text files are converted
> to unix newlines.
>
> How can I prev
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris January [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 March 2003 23:34
> To: jon ewing; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: sudo and runas
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Under XP (and maybe other Windows?) there's a command, runas, which
> > when used from cmd.exe or t
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
> > Yeah, why? I'm obviously on this mailing list, since I answered your
> > question, so why did you decide to reply to me off list?
>
> Sorry for butting in... but I have been there myself.
>
> IMO there is one, not so obvious, mal
Matthias,
I don't think anyone on this list will know how to answer this particular
question unless you provide some more info.
I suggest you read:
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC29
and perhaps:
http://www.cygwin.com/bugs.html
and get back to us when you've done that.
rlc
On Thu, 6 Mar 2
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:47:59PM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
> >From searching the archives more, it looks to me like the major hold up
> for this was newlib. But, it appears to me that newlib now has 64 bit
> stdio support. How is this not sufficient?
It will require some work, that's it. The g
Sorry for the long delay...
[..]
> What windows versions are those running?
Test is running Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 and
dkms1301 is running Windows 2002 Service Pack 3.
[..]
> Can you be more explicit about 'some bits'? The symlink is
> not in the package, it should be created during postin
Hi Luis and All,
When trying to run through the JNI native C code compiled in a DLL
using Cygwin, I found that standard Java output stops to work as
soon as the DLL is loaded. However, if the same code is compiled
without Cygwing (-mno-cygwin) the Java output works OK after and
before loading the
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:43:43AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:47:59PM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
> > >From searching the archives more, it looks to me like the major hold up
> > for this was newlib. But, it appears to me that newlib now has 64 bit
> > stdio support.
Hi Robert,
I guess, you're plate is pretty full right now. But did you make any
progress on updating the libxml and libxslt packages? Do you have any
new timeframe info as to their planned release?
Thanks,
Patrick
Robert Collins schrieb:
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 06:14, Patrick Eisenacher wrote:
G
Hello
I have made a little progress, I found mail about a problem similar to
mine
The solution was:
chmod a+x /bin
chmod a+x /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.2/
now I get
gcc hello.c -o hello
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.2/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld:
cannot open crt0.o: No such file
I noticed that the emacs/21.2 built with both the 1.3.13-2 and
the 1.3.18-1 (2 distributions I have on 2 different machines)
is built in a funny way: a whole ton of stuff is loaded up
at startup due to 'loadup.el' being loaded, even when I start with
'emacs -q'. I have a script which runs emacs i
Good morning,
Thank you for your help.
The solution was simpler that I could imagine.
I had installed the tsch package but I didn't know it was there
and actually links to csh/THANKS.
The only that I had to do is to change the first line of
#!/bin/csh -f
to
#!/bin/tcsh -f
and the config file work
Emacs Makes Computers Slower.
Offtopic, I know, but I could not resist.
Btw. I only just started using emacs, what you are
saying is that it can startup faster ? I thought that
was default behaviour.
Jurgen
"Richard H. Broberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/07/2003
Hello all,
As I suggested in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-03/msg00111.html that
it would be a good idea to run the testsuite against snapshots, and as I
said in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-03/msg00195.html that I would do
it anyway, I have made a Makefile (attached) that downloads the
There's been sporadic interest in rpm, so I thought someone might find this
useful:
I've recently succeeded in persuading rpm-4.1 to compile under Cygwin.
It was more troublesome than rpm-4.0.4, as it makes some assumptions about
the system, and doesn't bother to use configure tests to make sure.
Richard H. Broberg wrote:
I noticed that the emacs/21.2 built with both the 1.3.13-2 and
the 1.3.18-1 (2 distributions I have on 2 different machines)
is built in a funny way: a whole ton of stuff is loaded up
at startup due to 'loadup.el' being loaded, even when I start with
'emacs -q'. I have a
I downloaded the setup.exe program from cygwin.com and
tried to run setup. Setup worked great for the base
packages, but I never saw an option for the other
packages. I believe that the button is there, but is
not in the window. I am running a Japanese version of
Windows 98 and believe that this
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> The results with cygwin-1.3.20-1 and with the latest snapshot are
> attached.
>
> # of expected passes240
> # of unexpected failures1
> # of unexpected successes 3
> # of expected failures
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:56:30AM +0100, Michael Lipp wrote:
>I think you are missing an important point: I can build xemacs
>successfully when I use the older (1.3.18) cygwin1.ddl! That's the only
>thing I have changed about the environment (as you can see in the
>environment dump, I'm still u
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:23:22PM +0100, Michael Graff Andersen wrote:
>Hello
>
>I have made a little progress, I found mail about a problem similar to
>mine
>
>The solution was:
>chmod a+x /bin
>chmod a+x /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.2/
>
>now I get
>gcc hello.c -o hello
>/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:12:07PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
>> The results with cygwin-1.3.20-1 and with the latest snapshot are
>> attached.
>>
>> # of expected passes240
>> # of unexpected failures
Hi...
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:56:30AM +0100, Michael Lipp wrote:
>I think you are missing an important point: I can build xemacs
>successfully when I use the older (1.3.18) cygwin1.ddl! That's the only
>thing I have changed about the environment (as you can see in the
>environment dump, I'm sti
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> > The results with cygwin-1.3.20-1 and with the latest snapshot are
> > attached.
> >
> > # of expected passes240
> > # of unexpected failures1
> > # of une
Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> BTW: is there any way to get the "current" or "latest" snapshot with a
> simple wget? (i.e. is there a
> http://www.cygwin.com/snapshots/latest...?) It would make it easier
> to make a "snapshot" target and get the new-cygwin1.dll from there :)
Not currently. If yo
Teun Burgers wrote:
When I libtoolize with libtool-devel-20030216, I can't build dll's that I was able to
build with libtool-devel-20030103. When linking with 20030216 I get messages such
as these:
[snip]
I get this message for the following libs:
-lcygwin -luser32 -ladvapi32 -lkernel32 -lshell3
I recently re-ran setup.exe and upgraded the packages I have installed and
was surprised to find that many of my projects no longer build with Cygwin.
They now fail with an error regarding the redefinition of struct option.
These projects use getopt_long() which is of course not portable; so I
Max Bowsher wrote:
There's been sporadic interest in rpm, so I thought someone might find this
useful:
I've recently succeeded in persuading rpm-4.1 to compile under Cygwin.
It was more troublesome than rpm-4.0.4, as it makes some assumptions about
the system, and doesn't bother to use configure te
Please check out the project web page for links to available information
and ports: http://cygwin.com/ .
If you don't see what you need there, then the cygwin mailing list is
the best place to make observations or get questions answered.
Information on the mailing list is available at the project
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>> There's been sporadic interest in rpm, so I thought someone might
>> find this useful:
>>
>> I've recently succeeded in persuading rpm-4.1 to compile under
>> Cygwin.
>> It was more troublesome than rpm-4.0.4, as it makes some assumptions
>> about the s
Good Day,
With warm heart I offer my friendship, and greetings, and I hope this mail meets you
in good time. However strange or surprising this contact might seem to you as we have
not met personally or had any dealings in the past, I humbly ask that you take due
consideration of its importance
Joseph Colton wrote:
> I downloaded the setup.exe program from cygwin.com and
> tried to run setup. Setup worked great for the base
> packages, but I never saw an option for the other
> packages. I believe that the button is there, but is
> not in the window. I am running a Japanese version of
>
I am currently trying to prioritize our Cygwin issue list. Here is what I
remember of that agenda, in no particular order:
fix bugs when threads have priorities
make Cygwin use sane, POSIX scheduling priorities (all positive, higher
number -> higher priority)
add DWARF 2 debugging support
add lar
I have thoroughly searched through the web for a
solution to this problem, but to no avail. Hopefully
someone can answer this here.
During my initial try on rxvt, I instantly concluded
that rxvt is much better place to run the bash shell
than the dos prompt terminal. Unfortunately, I have
discover
Hi Everyone.
I was looking into Cygwin's multi-user capabilities with regards to
security, separate memory space, separate user context sessions. I see that
remote Cygwin sessions run in a shared memory space along with the console.
(If I interpreted the FAQ correctly.)
Is it possible to confi
Max Bowsher wrote:
I thought that rpm-4.x required Berkeley db-4.x -- which has not yet
been officially added to the cygwin distro. AFAIK, we have db2 and
db3, but not db4. How did you satisfy that dependency?
RPM includes a copy of Berkerly DB in its source tarball, and will build
with the in
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:21:08PM -0500, James D Below wrote:
>Is it possible to configure Cygwin into using separate memory spaces
>and/or running in separate user context sessions?
No.
>If not, is this something in Cygwin's future?
Not that I'm aware of. If it is an issue there is always the
OK, then perhaps you want to check the permissions on those files
relative to your /etc/passwd and /etc/groups. If that doesn't
present the solution, you may want to send this information along
to the list after reading
Larry
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Now, about your problem: I'm a bit confused, because I do *not* see that
> behavior. Please take the attached script, which contains only the new
> win32_libid() code -- the only parted changed by the patched
> libtool-20030216 -- and run the following tests:
>
> ./cygwin
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>> RPM includes a copy of Berkerly DB in its source tarball, and will
>> build with the internal db unless explicitly told to try using the
>> system db.
>
> Oh, ok. If anybody wants to add rpm to the cygwin distribution as a
> supported package, though,
Igor:
Thanks for your help. If your right we'd have to update several scripts
to eliminate drive letters in the path. Contrary to your hint is this
snippet from the FAQ: ( http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#USING-PATHNAMES ):
Mapping path names
Introduction
Cygwin suppor
Tom,
I know Cygwin supports Win32 paths. I suspect the issue here is mount
type (text vs. binary). If you use a POSIX path, you can control whether
your files are opened in text or binary mode. To tell the truth, I don't
know exactly what the mode defaults to if a Win32 path is used (and yes, I
Teun Burgers wrote:
>
> Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > Now, about your problem: I'm a bit confused, because I do *not* see that
> > behavior. Please take the attached script, which contains only the new
> > win32_libid() code -- the only parted changed by the patched
> > libtool-20030216 -- and run
Teun Burgers wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
Now, about your problem: I'm a bit confused, because I do *not* see that
behavior. Please take the attached script, which contains only the new
win32_libid() code -- the only parted changed by the patched
libtool-20030216 -- and run the following tests
"Janus Nicolay Christensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Test is running Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 and
> dkms1301 is running Windows 2002 Service Pack 3.
Ok. Not too Mickey Mouse-isch :-)
> On test the /usr/share/texmf/web2c directory contains 5.2 MB. On
> dkms1301 this figure is 0.6 MB.
Th
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Teun Burgers wrote:
> Teun Burgers wrote:
> >
> > Charles Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > Now, about your problem: I'm a bit confused, because I do *not* see that
> > > behavior. Please take the attached script, which contains only the new
> > > win32_libid() code -- the only parted c
Hi,
(running on 1.3.20)
"df ." seems to work fine on traditionally mounted network drives, but not
on UNC (//server/share) drives:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/dobrin> cd //billabong/dist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/billabong/dist> df .
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
df: `.'
Max Bowsher wrote:
I'm not quite sure rpm really is desirable for the Cygwin dist, unless it
was decided to transition to rpm packages exclusively once setup was
suitably adapted.
Well, there are grand designs eventually to generalize setup so that it
can accept tar.bz2 (or .cyg?) packages, as we
On Friday 7 Mar 03, Teun Burgers writes:
> I've found the culprit. I installed the perl LWP module which
> installs a HEAD script that fetches the header of an URL.
> On unix HEAD and head are different but on cygwin having
> both HEAD and head.exe along the path causes a problem...
Would CYGWIN=c
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, David Starks-Browning wrote:
> On Friday 7 Mar 03, Teun Burgers writes:
> > I've found the culprit. I installed the perl LWP module which
> > installs a HEAD script that fetches the header of an URL.
> > On unix HEAD and head are different but on cygwin having
> > both HEAD and
David Starks-Browning wrote:
On Friday 7 Mar 03, Teun Burgers writes:
I've found the culprit. I installed the perl LWP module which
installs a HEAD script that fetches the header of an URL.
On unix HEAD and head are different but on cygwin having
both HEAD and head.exe along the path causes a pr
(Please cc: me if you would on any replies)
I would appreciate some insight on this problem, as it would
be great to be able to do what we're attempting:
If I create a domain user and add it to the sshd password file,
and it's home directory is on a file server \\my_server\my_user,
and set up a
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
FYI, in my case it made the error more apparent (something like
"/usr/bin/tail: no such file or directory"), but no less cryptic.
The temporary fix is to rename /bin/HEAD to /bin/HEAD.pl (along with the
other two scripts, just for consistency). If it ever gets accepted in
Christopher,
Your theory is apparently correct.
One workaround you might try is allowing the sshd service to interact with
the desktop (by checking the appropriate box) and mounting the share as
the logged-on user. What others reported as a "security problem" (that a
user can access other users'
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 10:02, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote
And, different agendas as well. No one in free software has to work
on things that they don't want to work on.
And, the theory that "You know how to do it. You're doing all this
other stuff, why d
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> OK - I'll write up a web page detailing how to use various aspects of
> setup, IF you will make the chooser resizable for me.
That sentence is incredibly antagonistic.
>>> *) Contract someone else to implement the feature for them. "I'll
>>> put $20 into a pool for the pro
Max Bowsher wrote:
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
OK - I'll write up a web page detailing how to use various aspects of
setup, IF you will make the chooser resizable for me.
That sentence is incredibly antagonistic.
Sorry you feel that way but I said it because I mean it. Obviously you
don't believe me.
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
>> On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 10:02, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>
Christopher Faylor wrote
>>
>> And, different agendas as well. No one in free software has to work
>> on things that they don't want to work on.
>>
>> And,
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
All in all, developers of Cygwin in particular are maintaining their
packages in their [copious] spare time, and to demand that something
be done "right now" because someone can't use their package is, to say
the least, unreasonable, IMO.
Did you honestly miss the part
In non-cygwin unix I'm familiar with being able to do the following in a
shell (bash or other):
$ nohup long-running-command &
$ exit
and be able to leave it running.
However, under cygwin (this has been true for at least back to cygwin/1.3.6
for me), when I start a process in the background an
Richard H. Broberg wrote:
> In non-cygwin unix I'm familiar with being able to do the following
> in a shell (bash or other):
>
> $ nohup long-running-command &
> $ exit
>
> and be able to leave it running.
>
> However, under cygwin (this has been true for at least back to
> cygwin/1.3.6 for me), w
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:00:28PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Richard H. Broberg wrote:
>> In non-cygwin unix I'm familiar with being able to do the following
>> in a shell (bash or other):
>>
>> $ nohup long-running-command &
>> $ exit
>>
>> and be able to leave it running.
>>
>> However, under cy
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:00:28PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Richard H. Broberg wrote:
>>> In non-cygwin unix I'm familiar with being able to do the following
>>> in a shell (bash or other):
>>>
>>> $ nohup long-running-command &
>>> $ exit
>>>
>>> and be able to le
Works for me using rxvt.
"Richard H. Broberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In non-cygwin unix I'm familiar with being able to do the following in a
> shell (bash or other):
>
> $ nohup long-running-command &
> $ exit
>
> and be able to leave it running.
>
> Howev
Works for me using rxvt.
"Richard H. Broberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In non-cygwin unix I'm familiar with being able to do the following in a
> shell (bash or other):
>
> $ nohup long-running-command &
> $ exit
>
> and be able to leave it running.
>
> Howev
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> > All in all, developers of Cygwin in particular are maintaining their
> > packages in their [copious] spare time, and to demand that something
> > be done "right now" because someone can't use their package is, to say
> > th
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:00:28PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >> Richard H. Broberg wrote:
> >>> In non-cygwin unix I'm familiar with being able to do the following
> >>> in a shell (bash or other):
> >>>
> >>> $ nohup
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 06:17:17PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:00:28PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> >> Richard H. Broberg wrote:
>> >>> In non-cygwin unix I'm familiar with being able to
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 06:17:17PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
>>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
This works for me:
nohup sleep 30 foo 2>&1&
at least with the latest version of cygwin...
>>>
>>> Doesn'
* Richard H. Broberg (03-03-07 22:47 +0100)
> In non-cygwin unix I'm familiar with being able to do the following in a
> shell (bash or other):
>
> $ nohup long-running-command &
> $ exit
>
> and be able to leave it running.
>
> However, under cygwin (this has been true for at least back to cygw
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Andrew,
I was not accusing anyone of anything; I was simply commenting on the
general statements made by people in this thread. I'm sorry if it
seems to you that you were accused. You did read the P.S., right?
The PS only says that this is not a flame. Still you reply t
Please keep replies on the list.
Joseph Colton wrote:
> --- Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Are your Windows DPI/font size settings non-default?
>> (In the Display control
>> panel)
>
> My font sizes are all default. I tried changing the
> font sizes, but was not able to affect the
When compiling a program I get the errors in the attached file.
Maybe I have done something wrong during the installation or maybe I just need
some -l flag?
I hope this question is "intelligent enough" ;-) I am a cygwin beginner but
proficcint with C/C++. I have searched the archives but
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 01:58:10AM +0100, Per Andersson wrote:
>When compiling a program I get the errors in the attached file.
>
>Maybe I have done something wrong during the installation or maybe I
>just need some -l flag?
The functions just don't exist in cygwin. You'll have to come up with
re
CYGWIN_NT-5.0 alpha 1.3.20(0.73/3/2) 2003-02-08 12:10 i686 unknown unknown Cygwin
Emacs 21.2-12
I have set CYGWIN to "tty nontsec", if it matters.
When I start `emacs -q -nw' from a Win32 console, I see these
problems:
* Meta-Control-K does nothing. For example, I type c M-C-k,
expecting to
Please keep replies on the list.
Richard H. Broberg wrote:
>> From: "Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> An unfortunate consequence of how Windows handles console windows.
>>
>> I believe it would be possible to write an alternative
>> implementation of nohup using fork/setsid, or perhaps e
Andrew DeFaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It is indeed a natural assumption that the phrase "to demand that
>something be done" is addressed to me, that I was demanding that
>something be done.
Andrew, relax. And pay attention. The whole thread was about people who did seem to
demand that so
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 09:31:21PM -0500, David Robinow wrote:
>Andrew DeFaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>It is indeed a natural assumption that the phrase "to demand that
>>something be done" is addressed to me, that I was demanding that
>>something be done.
>Andrew, relax. And pay attentio
Hi all,
I encountered a linking problem when trying to make Tim's program
xcircuit(http://xcircuit.ece.jhu.edu/) that uses tcltk. The linker
conplains that undefined reference to `_Tcl_NewObj' ...etc.
I am sure I installed tcl/tk when installing Cygwin. In
addition, doing "cygcheck -c"
produ
I've made a new version of GDB (aka insight) available for downloading.
This version is a refresh from CVS on sources.redhat.com. It fixes
a reported problem where typing a '-' as input caused gdb to crash.
To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on
the http://cygwin.c
The tiff package has been updated to version 3.6.0-1. It is based
on the official tiff-v3.6.0beta.tar.gz distribution, and provides a
library and utility routines for manipulating tiff files and images.
Changes (relative to 3.5.7)
o Updated to 3.6.0beta source
- New utility raw2tiff for con
I've made a new version of binutils available for installation.
This version is a refresh from CVS on sources.redhat.com.
This release has one minor change from Chuck Wilson to make
--enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc the default for `ld'.
To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now"
您好，我的邮箱从4月份起更改为 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
87 matches
Mail list logo
