On Dec 20 23:13, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
/usr/include/pty.h
The next version of inetutils will not have this file anymore. The whole
funtionality of libutil.a has been moved to the Cygwin DLL with 1.5.6 at
least.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 20 23:13, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
/usr/include/pty.h
The next version of inetutils will not have this file anymore. The whole
funtionality of libutil.a has been moved to the Cygwin DLL with 1.5.6 at
least.
Corinna
Yes, I'm aware of
Hi,
There is a bug in the naim-0.11.6.4-1-src.tar.bz2 source tarball on the
mirrors: the build script is not executable in the tar file. No biggie,
as it could easily be chmod'ed, but this should be fixed at some point.
Igor
--
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Hi,
There is a bug in the naim-0.11.6.4-1-src.tar.bz2 source tarball on the
mirrors: the build script is not executable in the tar file. No biggie,
as it could easily be chmod'ed, but this should be fixed at some point.
Igor
Should've
Hallo JJ,
here you have an xev.c, I had no trouble compiling it on HP/UX 11.
I haven't been able to get the xterm's on HP/UX or AIX to work with AltGr
and dead keys, I'm using xterm from Cygwin/X and rlogin to the HP/UX box
(which is not really BIG - physically).
Geert
-Original
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have done my best with recent topic-related comms (2001, 2003 mainly) but
still need a hand if anybody can help.
For reasons I really don't want to alter, I prefer to start XWin after
opening a bash console, and not from Windows (Start - Run - ... or a
command
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xwin -query hostname -nodecoration -lesspointer
to get me to a login have not been successful. The server
(192.168.1.2) seems to respond as in this dump
Unfortunately this
Andrew,
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
I have a similar problem. This is with a SuSE 8.2 installation. I had
Mandrake 9.1 installed before and managed to get XDMCP working. Can't
get it working with SuSE however and I'm pulling my hair out!
I have nothing in my /var/log/messages nor /var/log/kdm.log
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Andrew,
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
I have a similar problem. This is with a SuSE 8.2 installation. I had
Mandrake 9.1 installed before and managed to get XDMCP working. Can't
get it working with SuSE however and I'm pulling my hair out!
I have nothing in my
Andrew,
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Andrew,
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
I have a similar problem. This is with a SuSE 8.2 installation. I had
Mandrake 9.1 installed before and managed to get XDMCP working. Can't
get it working with SuSE however and I'm pulling my hair out!
I
Hi,
winCreateBoundingWindowWindowed calls BringWindowToTop,
but maybe this is not needed in multi-window mode.
I have done my best with recent topic-related comms (2001, 2003 mainly) but
still need a hand if anybody can help.
For reasons I really don't want to alter, I prefer to start XWin
Additionally I made sure the following appears in
/opt/kde3/share/config/Xaccess and /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess:
# The nicest way to run the chooser is to just ask it to broadcast
# requests to the network - that way new hosts show up automatically.
# Sometimes, however, the chooser can't figure
Hi,
I am getting the following on running query on cron service:
-
$ cygrunsrv.exe -Q cron
Service cron exists
Type: Own Process
Current State : Stopped
Controls Accepted :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
$ cygrunsrv.exe
Hi,
Just now I tried to install the arm-elf-tools-cygwin. The system just
gave an information Bad, You are not root. Is it a bug or anything else?
Regards
Hu Ying
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Greetings,
Using Cygwin 1.5.5-1, I am porting a Unix shared library to Windows.
After making and linking the library with libtool, two DLLs were
created:
libxx.dll.a
cygxx-1.dll
I guess I was only expecting: libxx.dll.
Why were the 2 names generated and why the cyg prefix on one of
Windows XP/Pro SP1 cygwin P4 system with these packages:
binutils 20030901-1 2.14.90 20030901
bison20030307-1 1.875b
cygwin 1.5.5-1
dejagnu 20021217-2 1.4.2.x
gawk 3.1.3-4
gcc
Greetings,
Using Cygwin 1.5.5-1, I am porting a Unix shared library to Windows.
After making and linking the library with libtool, two DLLs were
created:
libxx.dll.a
cygxx-1.dll
I guess I was only expecting: libxx.dll.
Why were the 2 names generated and why the cyg
Roy Clemmons wrote:
Greetings,
Using Cygwin 1.5.5-1, I am porting a Unix shared library to Windows.
After making and linking the library with libtool, two DLLs were
created:
libxx.dll.a
cygxx-1.dll
libxx.dll.a is the import library
cygxx-1.dll is the dll
Read
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:30:44PM +0800, Hu Ying wrote:
Just now I tried to install the arm-elf-tools-cygwin. The system just
gave an information Bad, You are not root. Is it a bug or anything
else?
Why are you asking us? Why not ask the people who provided you with
arm-elf-tools-cygwin?
--
Hi Jeff,
while I appreciate the work you've put into this project, I don't think
it's the way to go to stick with the current version of ssmtp and only
change it that much for Cygwin.
The mainline version of ssmtp is currently 2.60.4 (see
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfiles) and I think
Patrick,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 04:05:20AM -0800, Patrick Samson wrote:
Postgresql's configure --with-tcl uses
/lib/tclConfig.sh to know how to link with TCL. But in
package tcltk version 20030901-1, usr/lib/tclConfig.sh
contains:
TCL_LIB_SPEC=''
so something required by Postgres isn't
Hi everybody!
I've been using Cygwin for a while and am really happy with it.
But recently my paranoid boss has asked me to prove him that there was no
security problem with using Cygwin on our secure network.
The first step towards this goal is to recompile Cygwin so that we can be
sure the code
libxx.dll.a is the import library
cygxx-1.dll is the dll
Read
http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/dll.html
for a more complete explanation.Thanks for the reply. Unless I missed
it, I still don't understand why the shared lib was created a cyg
prefix and a -1 suffix. But, be that as it may,
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hi all,
in my attempts to fix an ugly bug in kaffe on Cygwin, the bug I'm
trying to squish turned out to be triggered by something that happens
*before* main is called.
snip
Since I'd like to know what modifes that opcode, I hope to be able to
set
Rafael,
Sorry for the delay...
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:26:07AM -0800, Rafael Kitover wrote:
I noticed that the rebaseall scripts rebases /usr/bin/libzsh-4.0.4.dll
and the modules in /usr/lib/zsh/4.1.1/zsh/*.dll, and that this breaks
zsh. Rebasing libzsh stops zsh from starting, and
Rafael,
Sorry for the delay...
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:38:03AM -0800, Rafael Kitover wrote:
I noticed that the /bin/rebaseall script assumes the following:
DefaultBaseAddress=0x7000
DefaultOffset=0x1
Is this going to be the standard base and offset for DLLs in Cygwin?
I guess
Ivan,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:47:19AM -0500, Petric, Ivan wrote:
please unsubscribe me...thanks!
Sorry, I don't have the authority, but you do!
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:29:25PM +0100, Gabriel SOUBIES wrote:
I've been using Cygwin for a while and am really happy with it.
But recently my paranoid boss has asked me to prove him that there was no
security problem with using Cygwin on our secure network.
Cygwin is not secure. It's a given.
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:
Rafael,
Sorry for the delay...
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:26:07AM -0800, Rafael Kitover wrote:
I noticed that the rebaseall scripts rebases /usr/bin/libzsh-4.0.4.dll
and the modules in /usr/lib/zsh/4.1.1/zsh/*.dll, and that this breaks
zsh.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:29:25PM +0100, Gabriel SOUBIES wrote:
I've been using Cygwin for a while and am really happy with it.
But recently my paranoid boss has asked me to prove him that there was no
security problem with using Cygwin on our secure network.
Cygwin
mauro zallocco wrote:
I noticed that the resulting Test.exe attempts to access the internet.
Is this expected ?
Its trying to access 24.25.4.107 which my getHost tool tells me is
rlghnc-dns-cac-02-dmfe1.nc.rr.com.
It's not unexpected or incorrect, but may be suboptimal.
This host is obviously
Jim Ramsay wrote:
Ha! Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem
running Windows on a 'secure' network.
To a person with that mentality, Bill Gates is implicitly trustworthy
(i.e. if he says it's true, it must be true by definition, because it's
a big company that stands
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:15:34AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote:
Jim Ramsay wrote:
Ha! Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem
running Windows on a 'secure' network.
To a person with that mentality, Bill Gates is implicitly trustworthy
(i.e. if he says it's true, it must be
proving a negative is much harder than proving a positive...
Arash Partow
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:15:34AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote:
Jim Ramsay wrote:
Ha! Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem
running Windows on a 'secure' network.
To a person with that mentality,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:54:43PM +, Arash Partow wrote:
proving a negative is much harder than proving a positive...
Yeah. You're right. It's better to just assume it's gloriously
trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
Microsoft.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Yeah. You're right. It's better to just assume it's gloriously
trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
Microsoft.
I like your sarcasm, but I prefer to assume that the only truly secure
network is one without computers attached, and the
I wanted to add threading to perl, so I snarfed the
5.8.2 distro and tried to build it. I got through
Configure (not without a little Space Ace flashback,
mind you), but when I did make(1) it went down into the
B-module build and croaked. The error message is shown
below.
I hacked around
Roy Clemmons wrote:
libxx.dll.a is the import library
cygxx-1.dll is the dll
Read
http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/dll.html
for a more complete explanation.Thanks for the reply. Unless I missed
it, I still don't understand why the shared lib was created a cyg
prefix and a -1 suffix.
I don't see how your sarcastic remarks relate to what i said...
Yeah. You're right. It's better to just assume it's gloriously
trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
Microsoft.
all i said was that its harder to prove something in a negative
context rather than a
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 12:39:04AM +, Arash Partow wrote:
I don't see how your sarcastic remarks relate to what i said...
Yeah. You're right. It's better to just assume it's gloriously
trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
Microsoft.
all i said was that its
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 04:31:57PM -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Yeah. You're right. It's better to just assume it's gloriously
trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
Microsoft.
I like your sarcasm, but I prefer to assume that the only truly
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 08:53:33PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 04:31:57PM -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I like your sarcasm, but I prefer to assume that the only truly secure
network is one without computers attached, and the only truly secure
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:13:00PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
I believe that the latest snapshot is as secure as Windows in the case
where the only Cygwin processes are logged in using Terminal Services
on Windows 2003 or Windows 2000 sp4, and do not have the Create Global
Object privilege
Blair P. Houghton wrote:
The people who were crazy enough to leave their email
addresses in perl's cygwin installation docs aren't
being helpful (unless you call reflexive BOFH-grade
whining helpful). You'd think they'd understand not to
make themselves available as POC if they're not POC.
44 matches
Mail list logo
