On Oct 6 12:10, Mark Paulus wrote:
> --- fhandler_tty_old.cc 2004-10-06 12:05:54.196444800 -0600
> +++ fhandler_tty.cc 2004-10-06 12:06:13.465645500 -0600
> @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ fhandler_tty_slave::read (void *ptr, siz
>w4[0] = signal_arrived;
>w4[1] = input_available_event;
>
> - DWO
On Oct 6 21:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Didn't we resolve that the need for SYSTEMROOT in the environment should
> be in the FAQ at some point?
>
> Joshua, could you add something about how SYSTEMROOT is required for proper
> operation with winsock?
That would be good.
> Or, even better yet
On Oct 7 16:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> bash-2.05b$ mount c:/temp/mnt/tmp /tmp
> mount: warning - /tmp does not exist.
>
> Maybe I still misunderstand. In what sense does /tmp not exist?
Under Unix, the directory in which you mount a partition must
exist:
$ mount /dev/hda /nirvana
On 7 Oct, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> or a similar message. From the perspective of Cygwin's mount, there's
> no /tmp directory at the moment you use it to mount c:\temp\mnt\tmp
> into it. That's all. In contrast to Unix, that's not breaking the
> mount, so you only get a warning. Use mou
forgot the log file. Here is it.
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
cygserver.log.bz2
Description: cygserver.log.bz2
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem rep
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of luke.kendall
> Sent: 07 October 2004 07:50
> On 7 Oct, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:49:29PM +1000,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tsk! CGF! PCYM! You too Luke!
> Now you have a situation where cygwin1.
Ok, I have cleared out my ssh_host* keys, and cleared the contents of
.ssh, so as to start over. I regenerated the keys by running
ssh-host-config.
I also changed my CYGWIN= to tty ntsec binmode
So I get prompted for a password, and looking at the event security log,
I get the following:
SYST
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, luke.kendall wrote:
> On 7 Oct, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:49:29PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erghm...
> > >After installing Cygwin by using a shell script running by executing
> > >bash from a network-installed Cygwin, the script fails wh
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:22:18AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of luke.kendall
>> Sent: 07 October 2004 07:50
>
>> On 7 Oct, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:49:29PM +1000,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Tsk! C
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:20:53AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Oct 6 21:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Didn't we resolve that the need for SYSTEMROOT in the environment should
>> be in the FAQ at some point?
>>
>> Joshua, could you add something about how SYSTEMROOT is required for prope
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
-snip-
> Basically, it's not enough to share the network directory -- you also have
> to have the "/", "/usr/bin", and "/usr/lib" mounts pointing to it for the
> network copy of Cygwin to work properly. So, your mount changing idea may
> not be so of
What are the isues about qmail license restrictions now?
Most know that it's vastly "superior" over other MTA's.
(i.e. people tend to like it more)
E.g. sourceware uses qmail
http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#what-software
I see in the thread around
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/ms
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 05:18:41PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>What are the isues about qmail license restrictions now?
>
>Most know that it's vastly "superior" over other MTA's.
>(i.e. people tend to like it more)
>E.g. sourceware uses qmail
> http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#what-software
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Reini Urban" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 1:22 AM
Subject: Re: cron doesnt run jobs (sometimes)!
> russ schrieb:
>
> > Hi there list!
> >
> > 1st off .im new to cygwin.
> >
> > i h
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 12:24:48PM -0400, Remy Gauthier wrote:
> >We have noticed (on V1.5.10-1 and V1.5.11-1) that after a call to
> >system(), the handlers were not being called after the child process
> >stopped. This program has this behaviour (
I hope that one or the other occurs. I spent free time for weeks trying
to figure out why my perl cgi scripts didn't work under cygwin/apache.
At least with a faq entry, a google for "cygwin socket error" would turn
up something useful.
-- Now that I think of it, this thread will probably also c
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
It's vanishingly unlikely that we'll get DJB's approval.
True.
You might check into how the netqmail does this:
http://www.qmail.org/netqmail/
They don't seem to offer binaries, so I assume the licensing problems
still exist.
So we could follow Igor's suggestion provid
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:26:47AM -0500, David A. Rogers wrote:
>I hope that one or the other occurs. I spent free time for weeks trying
>to figure out why my perl cgi scripts didn't work under cygwin/apache.
>
>At least with a faq entry, a google for "cygwin socket error" would turn
>up somethin
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:20:53AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>>What about
>>always adding SYSTEMROOT to the windows env created in build_env,
>>if it's missing?
>
>That's what I was thinking. And then lying about its existence if
>someone queries the environmen
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Richard Troy
> Sent: 07 October 2004 15:57
[ We're getting a bit OT here, since this is generic programming stuff
rather than cygspecific, so if you want to discuss the generalities here any
further we should TITTTL. ]
> P.S. Igor,
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:30:42AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 12:24:48PM -0400, Remy Gauthier wrote:
>> >We have noticed (on V1.5.10-1 and V1.5.11-1) that after a call to
>> >system(), the handlers were not being called after
On Oct 7 12:38, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:26:47AM -0500, David A. Rogers wrote:
> >I hope that one or the other occurs. I spent free time for weeks trying
> >to figure out why my perl cgi scripts didn't work under cygwin/apache.
> >
> >At least with a faq entry, a goo
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 06:34:52PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>Christopher Faylor schrieb:
>>You might check into how the netqmail does this:
>> http://www.qmail.org/netqmail/
>>
>>They don't seem to offer binaries, so I assume the licensing problems
>>still exist.
>
>So we could follow Igor's sugg
On Oct 7 10:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:20:53AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 6 21:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> Or, even better yet, Corinna could we force SYSTEMROOT to be used
> >> somehow but masked if someone removes it from the environment?
> >
Corinna,
Thanks for applying this, and I apologize for not following
protocol. Subsequent patches will go to cygwin-patches,
and will be accompanied by ChangeLog entries as well.
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:01:49 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Oct 6 12:10, Mark Paulus wrote:
>> --- fhandler_tty
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 07:07:23PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Oct 7 10:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:20:53AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Oct 6 21:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> Or, even better yet, Corinna could we force SYSTEMROOT to be used
>
Reini Urban wrote:
> So we could follow Igor's suggestion providing the sources in the binary
> package and compile it after download.
>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg01654.html
> At least better than nothing. exim would need a comparative and simplier
> MTA.
>
> I failed with try
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 7 10:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> Why is that a requirement anyway? Why is it necessary to hide
> $SYSTEMROOT? I don't see a reason for that?
>
> Corinna
>
>
apache strips it out before launching cgi programs. cgi programs that
need to
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:21:48PM -0500, David A. Rogers wrote:
>On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Oct 7 10:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
No, I didn't.
>> Why is that a requirement anyway? Why is it necessary to hide
>> $SYSTEMROOT?
I have a few user reporting the following problem:
After upgrading from cygwin 1.5.10-3 to cygwin 1.5.11;
Using Bitkeeper over a ssh connection just hang after the
password prompt.
[I can reproduce it at will too]
I ran the test with the same version of openssh (3.9.p1)
It worked i
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:21:48PM -0500, David A. Rogers wrote:
> >On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Oct 7 10:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> No, I didn't.
True enough. Snipped inco
Hi Andrew...
Are those usere using Windows XP SP2? If so, this sounds like the pipe
problem with cygwin on XP SP2 that is being worked.
Thanks,
...Karl
From: Andrew Chang To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ssh/BitKeeper connection does not work on cygwin1.5.11?
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:32:07 -0700
I
David A. Rogers wrote:
> ...
> Corrina asked why it was necessary to hide SYSTEMROOT. I read that as "What
> is the reason for hiding SYSTEMROOT?"
Reading skills needed! Her name is Corinna. Also, if you'd read the
whole thread you'd have seen that your information was already known.
Perhaps yo
Hi,
I'm trying to compile guile-1.7.1 on cygwin, with a recently installed
libtool,
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.6 (1.1220.2.95 2004/04/11 05:50:42)
At some point, make issues the following command line,
/bin/bash ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c
l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile guile-1.7.1 on cygwin, with a recently installed
> libtool,
>
> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.6 (1.1220.2.95 2004/04/11 05:50:42)
>
addendum: 1.5.10 has the same behavior.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ht
At 11:50 AM 10/7/2004, you wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Reini Urban" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 1:22 AM
>Subject: Re: cron doesnt run jobs (sometimes)!
>
>
>> russ schrieb:
>>
>> > Hi there list!
>
At 05:07 PM 10/7/2004, you wrote:
>In any case, I don't think an attempt to be helpful warrents a snippy
>response.
Maybe I've been on this list too long but I didn't find Chris's response to
be snippy at all. Just very descriptive and declarative. To each his own.
--
Larry Hall
On Thursday 07 October 2004 14:25, Karl M wrote:
> Hi Andrew...
>
> Are those usere using Windows XP SP2?
yes, it is XP with SP2
> If so, this sounds like the pipe
> problem with cygwin on XP SP2 that is being worked.
Thanks, that helps a lot..
>
> Thanks,
>
> ...Karl
>
> From: Andrew Chang To:
Hello Han-Wen,
> libtool: install: warning: relinking `libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-2.la'
I saw also problems with the useless relinking, I think it is time to
remove this for Cygwin completely. I have already fixed it in my
local copy:
$ diff -ud ltmain.sh.old ltmain.sh
--- ltmain.sh.old
There is a snapshot up there now which contains Corinna's workaround for
this problem. We both came up with very similar solutions to the
problem. So that means it just has to be perfect.
Please try out the snapshot: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ .
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.co
On 7 Oct, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, luke.kendall wrote:
>
> > On 7 Oct, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:49:29PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Erghm...
We all make mistakes. :-)
> > > >After installing Cygwin by using a shell script r
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:53:30AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On 7 Oct, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, luke.kendall wrote:
>>
>> > On 7 Oct, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:49:29PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Erghm...
>
>We all m
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, luke.kendall wrote:
> On 7 Oct, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, luke.kendall wrote:
> >
> > > On 7 Oct, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:49:29PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Erghm...
>
> We all make mistakes. :-)
We
[Making a conscious decision to snip in-the-clear email addresses, because
I'm not Above The Law]
> Reini Urban wrote:
>
> > So we could follow Igor's suggestion providing the sources in the
> > binary package and compile it after download.
> >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg01654
Gary R. Van Sickle schrieb:
>cgf:
Does maildir even work without resorting to managed mounts?
Nope, it can't. Special chars in the filenames which Windows either doesn't
support at all or treats differently than Unii. Maildir is a decent idea
implemented in a non-POSIX, non-portable manner.
And t
On 7 Oct, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, luke.kendall wrote:
>
> > On 7 Oct, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, luke.kendall wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 7 Oct, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:49:29PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7 Oct, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I've mentioned that mutt does this automatically if there is no user name
> associated with an email address. I am not going to go out of my way
> to police my email if a person is going to send their mail in a nonstandard
> way.
>
> So you can sa
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
$ diff -ud ltmain.sh.old ltmain.sh
--- ltmain.sh.old 2004-10-08 01:56:36.797564800 +0200
+++ ltmain.sh 2004-10-02 02:24:08.852576000 +0200
@@ -2416,7 +2416,7 @@
{ test "$prefer_static_libs" = no || test -z "$old_library"; }; then
if test "$install
On 8 Oct, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now to see if I can find where /etc/profile went, and if no joy, try
> again with the modified scripts and new knowledge...
No joy. /etc/profile, passwd, and group were simply missing.
Even doing a grep for /etc/profile in setup.log and .full showed no
e
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:13:46 -0400, Christopher Faylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What needs to be done in Cygwin to see "struct stat" ?
>
> There is no stat64 in cygwin. Use stat.
>
> This. Is a recording.
>
> I guess it should be a FAQ.
Well, OK, it will be.
--
Unsubscribe info: htt
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 20:37:07 -0400, Christopher Faylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a snapshot up there now which contains Corinna's workaround for
> this problem. We both came up with very similar solutions to the
> problem. So that means it just has to be perfect.
>
> Please try out th
Dan Osborne wrote:
Could you get the test program to work? That shows how it wants to play.
The only problem I found with it was that it wouldn't follow shared objects.
Yeah, that seems to be the problem I have to. Unfortunately the memory
corruption I'm looking for is *in* a shared object. And c
52 matches
Mail list logo
