Re: Welcoming Brian Dessent as setup maintainer

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 3 23:48, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: FWIW, I like the --expert option suggested by CGF. I like the idea of having an expert and a dumm^Wstandard mode, but I would rather see a switch in the GUI, than just in the CLI. I think it should be possible to override dependencies on the fly and as

RE: Welcoming Brian Dessent as setup maintainer

2005-05-04 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message From: Brian Dessent Sent: 04 May 2005 04:12 The only one that makes any sense is when you're trying to uninstall a large dependency tree, such as if you want to get rid of X11. The last time I tried this it was quite hard, since you would turn off one package, but in

Re: [patch] manifest, and test release

2005-05-04 Thread Max Bowsher
Brian Dessent wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: There is one remaining issue - here is a ChangeLog entry from the current release branch: 2004-11-28 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] * download.cc (check_for_cached): Re-introduce the silent skipping of wrong-sized package files in local

Re: Welcoming Brian Dessent as setup maintainer

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 3 15:30, Brian Dessent wrote: The problem is joe user installs for me and then tries to install a service like sshd, cron, etc. And it naturally fails because SYSTEM doesn't see any mounts. So one or more of (setup.exe, cygrunsrv, /usr/bin/foo-install-script) probably needs to do

Re: Summary, was Re: Welcoming ...

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 3 20:42, Brian Dessent wrote: - accessibility or just less confusing package selection widget That reminds me... is there any chance to use standard Windows widgets which allow use of the keyboard for blind users? We have been asked for that at least twice. Corinna -- Corinna

TODO in PickPackageLine.cc

2005-05-04 Thread Max Bowsher
I recently added a TODO to PickPackageLine.cc, marking a piece of code which seems a little suspect to me. I did try to follow up on my suspicion, but got lost in the dependency processing code. I'll have another go at it later, but I'd appreciate any input from others. Max.

Re: TODO in PickPackageLine.cc

2005-05-04 Thread Brian Dessent
Max Bowsher wrote: I recently added a TODO to PickPackageLine.cc, marking a piece of code which seems a little suspect to me. I did try to follow up on my suspicion, but got lost in the dependency processing code. I'll have another go at it later, but I'd appreciate any input from others.

Re: [patch] manifest, and test release

2005-05-04 Thread Brian Dessent
Max Bowsher wrote: +name=RedHat.Cygwin.Setup ... perhaps just Cygwin.Setup here ? To be honest I have no idea, but was going by what the SDK says. About 'name' it says: Uniquely names the application or assembly. Use the following format for the name:

Re: [patch] manifest, and test release

2005-05-04 Thread Max Bowsher
Brian Dessent wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: +name=RedHat.Cygwin.Setup ... perhaps just Cygwin.Setup here ? To be honest I have no idea, but was going by what the SDK says. About 'name' it says: Uniquely names the application or assembly. Use the following format for the name:

Re: [patch] manifest, and test release

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 13:42, Max Bowsher wrote: I'm concerned that Red Hat might not want us to use their name under those circumstances. No reason to be concerned, really. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader

Re: [patch] manifest, and test release

2005-05-04 Thread Max Bowsher
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 4 13:42, Max Bowsher wrote: I'm concerned that Red Hat might not want us to use their name under those circumstances. No reason to be concerned, really. OK. In that case, I am happy with Brian's manifest patch as previously posted. Max.

Please upload: xpdf-3.00-2

2005-05-04 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Hi Please upload at your earliest convinience cut here #!/bin/bash mkdir xpdf cd xpdf # wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/xpdf/setup.hint wget

Please upload: openldap-2.2.26-1/libopenldap2_2_7-2.2.26-1/openldap-devel-2.2.26-1

2005-05-04 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Hi Please upload at your earliest convinience. cut here #!/bin/bash mkdir -p openldap openldap/openldap-devel openldap/libopenldap2_2_7 cd openldap # wget

Please upload: tzcode-2005h-1

2005-05-04 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Hi Please upload at your earliest convinience cut here #!/bin/bash mkdir tzcode cd tzcode # wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/tzcode/setup.hint wget

Please upload: xemacs-21.4.17-1/xemacs-tags-21.4.17-1/xemacs-emacs-common-21.4.17-1

2005-05-04 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Hi Please upload at your earliest convinience cut here #!/bin/bash mkdir -p xemacs/xemacs-emacs-common xemacs/xemacs-tags cd xemacs wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/xemacs/setup.hint wget

RE: [PATCH] Uninstall .dll last, reinstall first - final version

2005-05-04 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID)
At Tuesday, May 03, 2005 5:28 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 3 21:49, Max Bowsher wrote: The other potential solution would be to attempt to uninstall the packages in dependency-sorted order, but that might get awkward in the case of circular dependencies. See my previous posting:

Re: Welcoming Brian Dessent as setup maintainer

2005-05-04 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 3 15:30, Brian Dessent wrote: The problem is joe user installs for me and then tries to install a service like sshd, cron, etc. And it naturally fails because SYSTEM doesn't see any mounts. So one or more of (setup.exe, cygrunsrv,

Please upload: man-1.5p-1

2005-05-04 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Hi Please upload at your earliest convinience cut here #!/bin/bash mkdir man cd man # wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/man/setup.hint wget

Re: Welcoming Brian Dessent as setup maintainer

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:49:25PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: I don't think that the option of reading READMEs should ever be turned off, unless it's via a command line option. I'd rather annoy people with the prospect of documentation than casually turn it off because

Re: Welcoming Brian Dessent as setup maintainer

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:10:15AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Wed, 4 May 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 3 15:30, Brian Dessent wrote: The problem is joe user installs for me and then tries to install a service like sshd, cron, etc. And it naturally fails because SYSTEM

Re: Please upload: xpdf-3.00-2

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 14:56, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/xpdf/xpdf-3.00-2-src.tar.bz2 wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/xpdf/xpdf-3.00-2.tar.bz2 Uploaded. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send

Re: Please upload: tzcode-2005h-1

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 14:57, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/tzcode/tzcode-2005h-1-src.tar.bz2 wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/tzcode/tzcode-2005h-1.tar.bz2 Uploaded. I've removed 2003e-1. Corinna -- Corinna

Re: Please upload: man-1.5p-1

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 15:40, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/man/man-1.5p-1-src.tar.bz2 wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/man/man-1.5p-1.tar.bz2 Uploaded. I've removed 1.5o1-1. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen

Re: Please upload: openldap-2.2.26-1/libopenldap2_2_7-2.2.26-1/openldap-devel-2.2.26-1

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 14:56, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: cut here #!/bin/bash mkdir -p openldap openldap/openldap-devel openldap/libopenldap2_2_7 cd openldap # wget

Re: [PATCH] Uninstall .dll last, reinstall first - final version

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 09:05, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) wrote: At Tuesday, May 03, 2005 5:28 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 3 21:49, Max Bowsher wrote: The other potential solution would be to attempt to uninstall the packages in dependency-sorted order, but that might get awkward in the case

Re: Welcoming Brian Dessent as setup maintainer

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 10:08, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:10:15AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: like the following to the initial welcome page: This is the Cygwin setup program. It can be used to perform both an initial setup and subsequent updates, so make sure you

Re: Please upload: xemacs-21.4.17-1/xemacs-tags-21.4.17-1/xemacs-emacs-common-21.4.17-1

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 14:58, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: cut here #!/bin/bash mkdir -p xemacs/xemacs-emacs-common xemacs/xemacs-tags cd xemacs wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/xemacs/setup.hint wget

Re: [PATCH] Uninstall .dll last, reinstall first - final version

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:45:22PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 4 09:05, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) wrote: At Tuesday, May 03, 2005 5:28 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 3 21:49, Max Bowsher wrote: The other potential solution would be to attempt to uninstall the packages in

doxygen update please? (I even have a patch!)

2005-05-04 Thread William. Rivet
Short version: I would like to see cygwin's doxygen updated. I think I followed the steps to make the needed files for a cygwin distribution but would like help. Ideally I would think the maintainer would look at what I have and work from there. (even if only to tell me to go fix x-y-z)

Re: doxygen update please? (I even have a patch!)

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:08:30AM -0400, William. Rivet wrote: Short version: I would like to see cygwin's doxygen updated. I think I followed the steps to make the needed files for a cygwin distribution but would like help. Ideally I would think the maintainer would look at what I have and work

Re: Welcoming Brian Dessent as setup maintainer

2005-05-04 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 4 10:08, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:10:15AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: like the following to the initial welcome page: This is the Cygwin setup program. It can be used to perform both an initial

Re: Please upload: xemacs-21.4.17-1/xemacs-tags-21.4.17-1/xemacs-emacs-common-21.4.17-1

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 08:37:58PM +0200, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: Corinna Vinschen writes: One question though: Why is 21.4.17-1 curr and 21.4.16-1 test? Shouldn't 21.4.16-1 better be removed now? setup.hint should have the following entries. prev: 21.4.15-1 curr: 21.4.17-1 test:

doxygen-1.4.2_20050421-1 ready for review.

2005-05-04 Thread Max Bowsher
doxygen-1.4.2_20050421-1 ready for packaging review: Setup URL: http://unicorn.robinson.cam.ac.uk/~mob22/cygdoxygen/ setup.hint: category: Devel requires: cygwin libpng12 sdesc: A documentation system for C++, C, Java, Objective-C, IDL (Corba and Microsoft flavors) and to some extent PHP, C#, and

Re: doxygen-1.4.2_20050421-1 ready for review.

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 08:38:15PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: doxygen-1.4.2_20050421-1 ready for packaging review: Setup URL: http://unicorn.robinson.cam.ac.uk/~mob22/cygdoxygen/ setup.hint: category: Devel requires: cygwin libpng12 sdesc: A documentation system for C++, C, Java, Objective-C, IDL

RE: Summary, was Re: Welcoming ...

2005-05-04 Thread Robb, Sam
Here's the synopsis of this thread and other recent conversations: ... If there was anything I missed, please add. Improved support for unattended installs would be particularly nice. The current state of setup is OK for unattended installs, but there are a couple of minor glitches here and

Gentle ping for Berkeley DB 4.3 package.

2005-05-04 Thread Max Bowsher
I'm not in any hurry for it, but it would be great if there could be a db4.3 package at some point in the next couple of months or so. Thanks! Max.

Re: Cannot connect to a Sun server using xterm

2005-05-04 Thread a12
Hello, Pardon my ignorance, but what am I supposed to do to solve the problem ? Regards, Marek Alexander Gottwald skrev: On Tue, 3 May 2005, a12 wrote: connect /tmp/.X11-unix/X0: No such file or directory X connection to localhost:10.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). What about this

Re: Cannot connect to a Sun server using xterm

2005-05-04 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Wed, 4 May 2005, a12 wrote: Hello, Pardon my ignorance, but what am I supposed to do to solve the problem ? Start XWin. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723

Re: Cannot connect to a Sun server using xterm

2005-05-04 Thread a12
Which means: use XDMCP don't use xterm. Please correct me, if I am wrong. Regards, Marek Alexander Gottwald skrev: On Wed, 4 May 2005, a12 wrote: Hello, Pardon my ignorance, but what am I supposed to do to solve the problem ? Start XWin.

XWin -indirect

2005-05-04 Thread Bill Schaffer
Hello. I am having a problem with XWin -indirect, where the foreign machine cannot access my local X server. I have researched the mailing list archives, and found this thread to be very similar: http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-06/msg00331.html But, it did not conclude with an

Re: Cannot connect to a Sun server using xterm

2005-05-04 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 4 May 2005, a12 wrote: Alexander Gottwald skrev: On Wed, 4 May 2005, a12 wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but what am I supposed to do to solve the problem ? Start XWin. Which means: use XDMCP don't use xterm. Please correct me, if I am wrong. You're wrong. It means

Re: XWin -indirect

2005-05-04 Thread Alexander Gottwald
Bill Schaffer wrote: The problem: Well, the user does get the list of systems, however, they can only access the system specified as the parameter to the indirect option. All of the other systems are blocked from accessing the XWin server on the user's machine, including the user's own

Re: XWin -indirect

2005-05-04 Thread Bill Schaffer
Thanks! That was the tip I needed. The one machine that couldn't access the others via XWin -query was the one I picked to test with. I went over to one of the other Win systems, did the -indirect and had no problems. A Windows firewall issue. I hate when that happens. Thanks muchly, -Bill

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog cygerrno.h debug.cc

2005-05-04 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-04 11:00:24 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog cygerrno.h debug.cc Log message: * cygerrno.h (__set_errno): Define as inline function here. (set_errno): Always define as

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog cygerrno.h

2005-05-04 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-04 11:05:13 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog cygerrno.h Log message: * cygerrno.h (__set_errno): Remove useless parentheses. Patches:

Re: Bespoke installations: simple elegance of setup.exe when setup.ini is absent

2005-05-04 Thread Carlo Florendo
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:57:03AM +0100, Cliff Hones wrote: Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: ... [Yet more boring vitriolic rubbish.] ... I've been on this list for a good four years now, and never ever considered setting up a filter. I came close during the

Re: setup alternatives (was Re: Bespoke installations: simple elegance of setup.exe when setup.ini is absent)

2005-05-04 Thread Arturus Magi
Jani Tiainen wrote: Why to reinvent wheel..? You could use existing systems, like Debian package-system (deb), RPM-system like Fedora Core/RedHat, or Gentoo's Emerge. I also seem to recall someone using apt-get in Cygwin-space at one time, but Google doesn't want to be my friend today. --

Re: Best antivirus for cygwin? - was Norton antivirus and the Trojans

2005-05-04 Thread Arturus Magi
bob sandefur wrote: Hi- Apparently Norton antivirus is getting a false positive with rsync and wget. I would really like to dump Norton AntiVirus but I have never found any AV program to be very satisfactory. I would like the following: 1. 64-bit compatible (if the drivers ever show up I will

RE: Can I mount an EXT3 partition that WinXP sees as (Unknown partition)?

2005-05-04 Thread Morche Matthias
On http://www.fs-driver.org/index.html You will find an ext2-driver for WXP, who is also able to read and write ext3-filesystems. matthias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI, explore2fs found both my boot and root partitions on the firewire external drive with no trouble. Thanks for the

RE: echo $(echo '\r') oddity

2005-05-04 Thread Jan Just Keijser
socat (http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/) is a multi-purpose relay tool that can be used to connect sockets to pipes and vice versa, or terminal pty's to TCP sockets etc etc. I have found it a very handy tool to build VPN-like things in a environment where you cannot or do not want to modify the

Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
I have had some success with using the -mno-cygwin flag, but this more complex case is failing. The code is mostly Fortran and all the Fortran routines compiles with the -mno-cygwin flag OK. However it uses some C routines which it puts in a library. The script for doing this, modified with the

Re: SSHD key based authentication hangs cscript

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 11:15, Stuart Westbury wrote: There are actually two problems here: 1) a problem with CygWin/OpenSSH (after public key authentication GetUserName() returns incorrect value)... Is this my problem? No, that's our problem. There's nothing we can do about it, I'm sorry.

Re: 1.5.16-1: chmod problem

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 06:53, Pach Roman (GS-EC/ESA4) * wrote: I admit I'm stubborn about this topic but I'd like to propose the change of chmod implementation. I thing, it would be nice if the 'chmod +/-w' would have in the discussed case the same functionality as the Windows' command 'attrib'. See

Re: CYGWIN sshd service could not be started

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 3 15:57, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: You probably want to reverse the test, e.g., --- ssh-host-config.orig 2005-05-02 13:09:13.984375000 -0700 +++ ssh-host-config 2005-05-02 13:23:50.640625000 -0700 @@ -583,6 +583,16 @@ chown ${_user}.544 ${LOCALSTATEDIR}/log/sshd.log

RE: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message From: John Williams Sent: 04 May 2005 06:20 OK - I see the confusion. Make is spawning ash as the subshell, not bash. Now everything you said makes sense. Out of interest, can that behaviour be modified at the runtime/user/Makefile level? The make documentation

Re: echo $(echo '\r') oddity

2005-05-04 Thread Brian Dessent
Jan Just Keijser wrote: socat (http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/) is a multi-purpose relay tool that can be used to connect sockets to pipes and vice versa, or terminal pty's to TCP sockets etc etc. I have found it a very handy tool to build VPN-like things in a environment where you cannot

Re: SSHD key based authentication hangs cscript

2005-05-04 Thread Brian Dessent
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Nothing wrong with that, but since this happens in user land and not within a registered Windows authentication package, there's a problem here. The new sub process still runs in the authenticated Is that what the old 'subautha' thing was aiming at? To be able to

Re: SSHD key based authentication hangs cscript

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 02:49, Brian Dessent wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Nothing wrong with that, but since this happens in user land and not within a registered Windows authentication package, there's a problem here. The new sub process still runs in the authenticated Is that what the old

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Brian Dessent
Brian Salter-Duke wrote: Beginning the DDI compilation at Wed May 4 18:09:43 AUSCST 2005 Compiling common object: soc_create.o gcc -DLINUX -O3 -mno-cygwin -fstrict-aliasing -I./include -DDDI_SOC -DMAX_SMP_PROCS=8 -DMAX_NODES=32 -c ./src/soc_create.c -o ./obj/soc_create.o In file included

AW: 1.5.16-1: chmod problem

2005-05-04 Thread Pach Roman (GS-EC/ESA4) *
Hello Corinna, it's running now !!! Thanks you very much for your fast reaction. Roman -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Corinna Vinschen Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2005 11:06 An: cygwin@cygwin.com Betreff: Re: 1.5.16-1: chmod problem

sshd problem: setgid: Invalid argument

2005-05-04 Thread Douglas De Couto
When I try to log into my Windows Server 2003 SP1 machine over ssh, I get the following error and my connection is closed after typing my password: $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: Last login: Wed May 4 14:04:26 2005 from mymachine setgid: Invalid argument Connection to

Re: sshd problem: setgid: Invalid argument

2005-05-04 Thread Steven Hartland
iirc your cygwin passwords are out of sync with windows. The details of this are covered in the readme I believe its been a long while since I set it up. Steve - Original Message - From: Douglas De Couto When I try to log into my Windows Server 2003 SP1 machine over ssh, I get the

Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 4 May 2005, John Williams wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: In this case, the operative observation is bash != ash. PWD is a bash construct. You would be much better off just using the gnu make CURDIR variable. Changing PWD to CURDIR in your examples makes things work

Re: CYGWIN sshd service could not be started

2005-05-04 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 3 15:57, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: You probably want to reverse the test, e.g., --- ssh-host-config.orig2005-05-02 13:09:13.984375000 -0700 +++ ssh-host-config 2005-05-02 13:23:50.640625000 -0700 @@ -583,6 +583,16 @@ chown

Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:27:15AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Wed, 4 May 2005, John Williams wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: In this case, the operative observation is bash != ash. PWD is a bash construct. You would be much better off just using the gnu make CURDIR

Re: setup alternatives (was Re: Bespoke installations: simple elegance of setup.exe when setup.ini is absent)

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:04:24AM -0400, Arturus Magi wrote: Jani Tiainen wrote: Why to reinvent wheel..? You could use existing systems, like Debian package-system (deb), RPM-system like Fedora Core/RedHat, or Gentoo's Emerge. I also seem to recall someone using apt-get in Cygwin-space at one

Perl: maximum number of lines for negative lookahead assertion

2005-05-04 Thread Paul G Cantalupo
Hello, I'm using the negative lookahead assertion in a regular expression to parse tokens of a text file that start with a ''. Some of the tokens can be very long like 500, 1000 or up to 2000 lines long. It seems that the negative lookahead assertion fails on tokens that are too many lines long.

Re: sh.exe coredumps when init.exe is running as service

2005-05-04 Thread Bob Heckel
* On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 04:33:35PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: I'm in the process of updating my packages. I just upgraded to cygwin-1.5.16 from 1.5.12. Now whenever I run configure from one of my packages sh.exe segfaults randomly. A

Re: CYGWIN sshd service could not be started

2005-05-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 4 09:35, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Wed, 4 May 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 3 15:57, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: You probably want to reverse the test, e.g., [...] I'm guessing the above is acceptable? Yes, it is. Thanks. In the future versions, we should also check

Re: sh.exe coredumps when init.exe is running as service

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:33:53AM -0400, Bob Heckel wrote: * On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 04:33:35PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: I'm in the process of updating my packages. I just upgraded to cygwin-1.5.16 from 1.5.12. Now whenever I run

Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Peter Farley
But what if it is *not* your Makefile, but someone else's, e.g. the many GNU source packages that expect bash behavior? Surely you don't intend that ordinary users (well, OK, anyone compiling from a source package isn't really ordinary) should modify every package maintained by GNU in order to

RE: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message From: Peter Farley Sent: 04 May 2005 16:06 But what if it is *not* your Makefile, but someone else's, e.g. the many GNU source packages that expect bash behavior? Surely you don't intend that ordinary users (well, OK, anyone compiling from a source package isn't

Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: Original Message From: Peter Farley Sent: 04 May 2005 16:06 But what if it is *not* your Makefile, but someone else's, e.g. the many GNU source packages that expect bash behavior? Surely you don't intend that ordinary users

Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Peter Farley
WHOA there. I think we have a slight failure to communicate. I am NOT the OP, I was just chiming in on the conversation (I should have said PMFJI right up front, apologies for forgetting that). That said, I understand your position better now, especially with Dave's workaround (perfectly

Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: Original Message From: Peter Farley Sent: 04 May 2005 16:06 But what if it is *not* your Makefile, but someone else's, e.g. the many GNU source packages that expect bash

RE: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message From: Peter Farley Sent: 04 May 2005 17:30 WHOA there. I think we have a slight failure to communicate. I am NOT the OP, I was just chiming in on the conversation Oops, so you are! Umm, I mean, So you aren't! Ermmm.. guess I mean Pardon me for not checking!

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Sam Steingold
* Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 03:00:37 -0700]: -mno-cygwin does not just make things that doesn't depend on the cygwin DLL, it removes Cygwin from the equation entirely. this is very unfortunate, actually. things like berkeley-db, postgresql, pcre c all have a native win32

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Larry Hall
At 12:53 PM 5/4/2005, you wrote: * Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 03:00:37 -0700]: -mno-cygwin does not just make things that doesn't depend on the cygwin DLL, it removes Cygwin from the equation entirely. this is very unfortunate, actually. things like berkeley-db, postgresql,

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread René Berber
Sam Steingold wrote: * Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 03:00:37 -0700]: -mno-cygwin does not just make things that doesn't depend on the cygwin DLL, it removes Cygwin from the equation entirely. this is very unfortunate, actually. things like berkeley-db, postgresql, pcre c all

RE: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message From: Christopher Faylor Sent: 04 May 2005 17:04 On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: Maybe because fixing the Makefile means not having to remember to type SHELL=/bin/bash.exe every time you invoke make? s,every time you invoke make,on those

Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 05:50:14PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: Original Message From: Peter Farley Sent: 04 May 2005 17:30 WHOA there. I think we have a slight failure to communicate. I am NOT the OP, I was just chiming in on the conversation Oops, so you are! Umm, I mean, So you

RE: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message From: Christopher Faylor Sent: 04 May 2005 18:13 The points are still valid, , however. I don't see any reason to raise global concerns about makefile interoperability with linux just because one person has a trivially-solveable problem with a couple of makefiles.

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:53:26PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: * Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 03:00:37 -0700]: -mno-cygwin does not just make things that doesn't depend on the cygwin DLL, it removes Cygwin from the equation entirely. this is very unfortunate, actually. things

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Sam Steingold
* Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 13:02:44 -0400]: At 12:53 PM 5/4/2005, you wrote: * Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 03:00:37 -0700]: -mno-cygwin does not just make things that doesn't depend on the cygwin DLL, it removes Cygwin from the equation entirely. this is

RE: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message From: Christopher Faylor Sent: 04 May 2005 18:20 as to ignore correctly installed libraries. You just have to put the libraries and headers in locations that are searched when -mno-cygwin is used. Those locations are distinct from the locations used when

Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
To clarify: 1) The correct long-term solution to the problem of bash/ash incompatibilities is to modify the makefile to avoid the problem. If the Makefile is yours, then you are done. If the makefile is from someone else, then you provide the someone else with a patch. If you can be guaranteed

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:34:46PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: Original Message From: Christopher Faylor Sent: 04 May 2005 18:20 as to ignore correctly installed libraries. You just have to put the libraries and headers in locations that are searched when -mno-cygwin is used. Those

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:32:19PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: * Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 13:02:44 -0400]: At 12:53 PM 5/4/2005, you wrote: * Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 03:00:37 -0700]: -mno-cygwin does not just make things that doesn't depend on the cygwin

RE: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message From: Sam Steingold Sent: 04 May 2005 18:32 That's something to take up with the MinGW folks (www.mingw.org). I am not quite clear on the exact relationship between cygwin and MinGW project (I assumed that they are independent except that cygwin includes parts of

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Sam Steingold
* Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 13:41:25 -0400]: On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:34:46PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: Original Message From: Christopher Faylor Sent: 04 May 2005 18:20 as to ignore correctly installed libraries. You just have to put the libraries and

Any people using the neon package?

2005-05-04 Thread Max Bowsher
The only user of the neon package within the Cygwin distribution itself is subversion. Neon has recently moved from 0.24.x to 0.25.x, a major API change. I would like to know whether the neon package is being used by anyone for anything else except subversion, so that I can decide how long the

RE: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux

2005-05-04 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Korn Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:38 AM To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: RE: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux HELLO? CAN ANYONE HEAR ME?tap-tap-tap Testing, testing, is this

Lilypond brought up to date?

2005-05-04 Thread John Sellers
At www.lilypond.org, the current stable version of Lilypond is 2.4.6 and the lastest development version is 2.5.22. The most current version of Lilypond offered by cygwin's setup for Windows is 2.4.3-1. This lag has been true for the last year or two. Is there any change any time soon that

Re: Lilypond brought up to date?

2005-05-04 Thread Bertalan Fodor
I'm still struggling with the release of 2.4.5. Anyway, 2.4.3 was released 6 months ago, and it is true that it takes quite some time to build a new version, because there are lots of problems appearing each time. Bert The most current version of Lilypond offered by cygwin's setup for Windows

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Sam Steingold
* Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-04 18:49:24 +0100]: Original Message From: Sam Steingold Sent: 04 May 2005 18:32 That's something to take up with the MinGW folks (www.mingw.org). I am not quite clear on the exact relationship between cygwin and MinGW project (I assumed that

Re: Best antivirus for cygwin? - was Norton antivirus and the Trojans

2005-05-04 Thread Reini Urban
Larry Hall schrieb: While discussion of this may be useful to folks on this list, anything beyond Cygwin's clamav package is probably off-topic here. Can I suggest you take this to the cygwin-talk list instead? It would certainly be on- topic there. And while we are here and there is still the

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 05:23:58PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: Well, duh. If you want to USE MinGW, you have to INSTALL it. That much is obvious. I thought I did - when I installed the gcc-mingw cygwin package. No. The name of the package is gcc-mingw. Did you think that you installed all of

Re: Best antivirus for cygwin? - was Norton antivirus and the Trojans

2005-05-04 Thread René Berber
Reini Urban wrote: [snip] And while we are here and there is still the latest release pending for some days, I just want to say that the test version in setup.exe is featurewise almost the same and the delay of the 0.84 release proper is caused by some change in the build system. [snip]

Re: Using -mno-cygwin flag

2005-05-04 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:00:37AM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: Brian Salter-Duke wrote: Beginning the DDI compilation at Wed May 4 18:09:43 AUSCST 2005 Compiling common object: soc_create.o gcc -DLINUX -O3 -mno-cygwin -fstrict-aliasing -I./include -DDDI_SOC -DMAX_SMP_PROCS=8

Re: CYGWIN sshd service could not be started

2005-05-04 Thread Brian Dessent
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: In the future versions, we should also check for user mounts for the SYSTEM user -- unlikely, but very nasty and hard to detect. I also wonder if the above test should go into configurations for all services, or perhaps even added to cygrunsrv in some form...

  1   2   >