Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there `real' environments that use a set-up like you describe,
> with a writable file system mounted inside a read-only one?
I vaguely recall doing this myself a while back, on a Solaris box. I
made /usr read-only, but /usr/tmp was a writeable files
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Blake) writes:
>> The algorithm change between 5.3.0 and 5.90 in lib/mkdir-p.c to
>> try mkdir() first instead of stat(), and key off of EEXIST, breaks
>> when mkdir() fails with EROFS on an intermediate directory when
>> the writable
Václav Haisman wrote:
/usr/lib/libboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s-1_33.a*
/usr/lib/libboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s.a*
This is called 'versioned' layout.
In my build scripts I would still like to be able to specify
-lboost_date_time and not -lboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s. Is it the
intention of the maintai
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>>IMHO, it is the kernel's job to provide an informative and, above all,
>>compatible-with-most-others errno value, unless there is a very
>>good reason. The small extra expense of an lstat call (*but only upon
>>failure with errno == EROFS*) doesn
> ...and both changes are available in the 11-Oct-2005 snapshot from
> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Thanks a lot for the quick response!
Jaime
__
Este mensaje, y en su caso, cualquier fichero anexo al mismo,
puede contener informacion clasificada por su emisor como confiden
Hello,
I try to compile polymake on cygwin.
Compiling works fine as long as cc1plus does not occupy more memory than
I have RAM (ca. 750 MB) on my machine. After this it gets of course
really slow.
I think the problem is, that polymake uses templates very heavy and
compiles with --ftemplate
On Oct 13 00:02, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Christopher Faylor writes:
> > I'm just wondering if there is some kind of official coreutils policy
> > here.
>
> Not for coreutils itself, no. However, the GNU coding standards make
> it clear that porting to systems like Cygwin is lower priority for the
>
On 13 oct. 05, at 00:30, Brian Dessent wrote:
Leonard Bouchet wrote:
# Step 1: open the ssh tunnel
$ ssh -fNL 139:myserver:139 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm surprised that this works. Normally if you try this on a windows
machine the port forwarding setup will fail because the local SMB
service on
On Oct 12 23:23, Gunnar Thielebein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it also possible to patch the cygrunsrv service installer for running
> native win32.exe? Means like if you run a windows command/app in bash is
> executed there must be also a way to do it in cygrunsrv.
> I know there are extra utilities for
Volker Zell writes:
> lilypond-internals.info in /usr/share/info/lilypond doesn't seem to be
> a valid info file.
Hmm, that looks interesting.
Thanks,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.o
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > I don't see how ignoring blocked signals would cause a SEGV however.
>
> Well... indirectly they do :) I hope you are not too annoyed already
> because this time I really found the cause of the problem.
On 13 oct. 05, at 10:38, Leonard Bouchet wrote:
I'm simply not sharing anything on the W98 box.
Actually, according to netstat, the binding works because it listens to
127.0.0.1:139, while the windows' sharing service listens to my locally
assigned ip address, for example 192.168.1.25:139.
Leonard Bouchet wrote:
> Actually, according to netstat, the binding works because it listens to
> 127.0.0.1:139, while the windows' sharing service listens to my locally
> assigned ip address, for example 192.168.1.25:139.
>
> That's my guess after some additional researches. I still don't know
On 13 oct. 05, at 12:45, Brian Dessent wrote:
But I guess that doesn't matter, since the net use succeeds and you can
access Z: through explorer. What happens if you try mounting Z:/
instead of using /cygdrive?
Thanks for your answer. I tried
$ mount //myserver/user /test
the command
Hello,
I have a programm that runs very well under Linux. In
this program I use the function mlockall() and i have
a problem to compile it and to run it under cygwin,
because the function mlockall() is not implemented in
the actual version. Have someone idee how to solve
this problem?
Regards
Amje
On Oct 13 13:01, L?onard Bouchet wrote:
>
> On 13 oct. 05, at 12:45, Brian Dessent wrote:
>
> >But I guess that doesn't matter, since the net use succeeds and you can
> >access Z: through explorer. What happens if you try mounting Z:/
> >instead of using /cygdrive?
>
> Thanks for your answer. I
Léonard Bouchet wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. I tried
> $ mount //myserver/user /test
> the command worked as shown with
> $ mount
> \\myserver\user on /tmp type system (binmode)
> ...
> but I still have my 'permission denied'
> $ cd /test
> BASH:
On Oct 13 13:04, Mohamed Amjed Ben Salah wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a programm that runs very well under Linux. In
> this program I use the function mlockall() and i have
> a problem to compile it and to run it under cygwin,
> because the function mlockall() is not implemented in
> the actual version
--- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit :
> On Oct 13 13:04, Mohamed Amjed Ben Salah wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have a programm that runs very well under Linux.
> In
> > this program I use the function mlockall() and i
> have
> > a problem to compile it and to run it under
> cygwin,
> > b
--- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> I'm not sure I understand your problem, but why don't you just use
> `rsync -e ssh'?
That's the first thing I tried, several days ago, I should have mentionned it!
It doesn't work because I have trouble with special characters and european
As of version 2.6.0, rsync uses ssh as default transport mechanism. Rsh is
still supported by 'rsync
-e rsh' syntax.
Rgrds Tev
> -Original Message-
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13. oktober 2005 13:26
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: ssh tunnel and pe
On Oct 13 14:10, Mohamed Amjed Ben Salah wrote:
> --- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
> > mlockall will probably never be implemented since
> > there's no support
> > for it on user mode level in Win32. There's support
> > for something like
> > m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Paul Eggert on 10/12/2005 3:24 PM:
> Thanks for reporting this. It is indeed a bug in
> coreutils/lib/mkdir-p.c. It can be triggered by other errors too.
> This is hard to write a test case for, but I'd like to fix things.
> Does the fol
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>
> > I don't know it this was unique to my machine, but am
> > reporting it in case anyone else runs into the same
> > issue. When running Microsoft update today, on Win2k,
> > the patch for Security Update for DirectX 9 for Windows
>
Ooops...
I use cygrunsrv to run Mercury32 (that, in addition to be a Win32
Applicatio, is not a console application) and it works.
Is there maybe some counter-effect that I don't know?
Ciao,
Danilo
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 12 23:23, Gunnar Thielebein wrote:
Hi,
Is
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > The 'now-abandoned "install it all at once"' problem was unabandoned two
> > setup releases ago (I believe), recent advice notwithstanding. Maybe
> > the setup developers will correct me if I'm wrong but AFAIK, there is n
--- Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> That won't work if the share requires a password, which your original
> post implied. What I meant was to "net use" the share as Z: (providing
> the password) and then "mount z:/ /foo/bar".
I can't test on the Win98 box right now, but the good
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:10:09PM +0200, Danilo Turina wrote:
>Ooops...
>
>I use cygrunsrv to run Mercury32 (that, in addition to be a Win32
>Applicatio, is not a console application) and it works.
>
>Is there maybe some counter-effect that I don't know?
Nothing serious. Every so often it will
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Oct 13 14:10, Mohamed Amjed Ben Salah wrote:
>> --- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
>
>http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
>
>> > mlockall will probably never be implemented since
>> > there's no support
>> > for it
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Danilo Turina wrote:
> Ooops...
>
> I use cygrunsrv to run Mercury32 (that, in addition to be a Win32
> Applicatio, is not a console application) and it works.
>
> Is there maybe some counter-effect that I don't know?
cygrunsrv should have no problems spawning a Windows app.
>>Is there maybe some counter-effect that I don't
know?
>
>Nothing serious. Every so often it will issue a
>pop-up dialog that says.
>
>"Look, behind you! It's a fiddler crab!"
>
> [OK]
>
>And, then when you look behind you there will be no
>fiddler crab.
>
>You still have to pre
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:49:00PM +0100, Antony Baxter wrote:
>>>Is there maybe some counter-effect that I don't know?
>>
>>Nothing serious. Every so often it will issue a pop-up dialog that
>>says.
>>
>>"Look, behind you! It's a fiddler crab!"
>>
>>[OK]
>>
>>And, then when you look behind you th
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Antony Baxter wrote:
> >>Is there maybe some counter-effect that I don't know?
> >
> >Nothing serious. Every so often it will issue a
> >pop-up dialog that says.
> >
> >"Look, behind you! It's a fiddler crab!"
> >
> > [OK]
> >
> >And, then when you look behin
On 10/13/2005, Oliver Wienand wrote:
I think the problem is, that polymake uses templates very heavy and
compiles with --ftemplate-depth-200.
I think you're right. The 'gcc' man pages says this about --ftemplate-depth:
-ftemplate-depth-n
Set the maximum instantiation depth
Greetings,
Are there any known issues about running "cygwin SSHD" service in a
production environment? Is there any concern I should be aware of or has
anyone run into problems running it on a production server with ColdFusion
running on it.
Thank you for your time.
--
Unsubscribe info:
ABi DaR wrote:
Greetings,
Are there any known issues about running "cygwin SSHD" service in a
production environment? Is there any concern I should be aware of or
has anyone run into problems running it on a production server with
ColdFusion running on it.
What kind of issues? Just how
I'm trying to ssh from cygwin to another system running AIX. The connection
fails. They seem to be at different levels, but are they not backward
compatible?
cygwin:
$ ssh -V
OpenSSH_4.2p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8 05 Jul 2005
AIX:
$ ssh -V
OpenSSH_3.7p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0.9.7b 10 Apr 2003
Daryl Spartz wrote:
I'm trying to ssh from cygwin to another system running AIX. The connection
fails. They seem to be at different levels, but are they not backward
compatible?
They ought to be - but you should also really only use version 2 - much,
much more secure.
cygwin:
$ ssh -V
OpenS
PS = Peter J. Stieber on 10/9/2005 7:59 PM:
PS It's attached. I added the -t command to the g++ command so
PS the loader would list the files it was processing when it breaks.
PS The name of the object file in the last line should be
PS SimpleInterpolationTable.o, but it gets trunc
"Peter J. Stieber" wrote:
> Sorry in advance for the stupid questions, but...
>
> I downloaded the binutils source package, and extracted the source. When
> I ran
>
> ./configure --help
>
> I didn't see a --enable-debug option or anything I though was
> equivalent. Am I missing something?
Norm
INFO
The gnu plotutils package (plotutils-2.4.1) is now available for cygwin.
This plotting utilities package includes release 4.1 of GNU libplot: a
thread-safe function library for exporting two-dimensional vector graphics.
Additional contents of the plotutils package:
1. libxmi. This is
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:39:13PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>"Peter J. Stieber" wrote:
>
>> Sorry in advance for the stupid questions, but...
>>
>> I downloaded the binutils source package, and extracted the source. When
>> I ran
>>
>> ./configure --help
>>
>> I didn't see a --enable-debug op
I'm trying to get the latest snap shot to fix this problem:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-08/msg00420.html
But all available snapshots from Sept and Oct cause cygwin1.dll
compatibility errors. Can I still get the Aug. 9th snapshot. Or what else
can I do?
Thanks.
--
Unsubscribe info: h
PS = Peter J. Stieber
PS>> Sorry in advance for the stupid questions, but...
PS>>
PS>> I downloaded the binutils source package, and
PS>> extracted the source. When
PS>> I ran
PS>>
PS>> ./configure --help
PS>>
PS>> I didn't see a --enable-debug option or anything
PS>> I though was equivalent. Am I
PS = Pete Stieber
PS>>> Do I also need to build a debug version of the cygwin DLL?
BD = Brian Dessent
BD>>It would help, since otherwise backtraces will only have raw
BD>> addresses. Note that the cygwin configure script[*] has a
BD>> --enable-debugging switch, but this is for enabling lots of
BD
Nick Adami wrote:
I'm trying to get the latest snap shot to fix this problem:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-08/msg00420.html
But all available snapshots from Sept and Oct cause cygwin1.dll
compatibility errors. Can I still get the Aug. 9th snapshot. Or what else
can I do?
What do you mean
PS = Peter J. Stieber
PS>>> Sorry in advance for the stupid questions, but...
PS>>>
PS>>> I downloaded the binutils source package, and
PS>>> extracted the source. When
PS>>> I ran
PS>>>
PS>>> ./configure --help
PS>>>
PS>>> I didn't see a --enable-debug option or anything
PS>>> I though was equiva
1. I built the binutils code from the source.
2. I renamed /usr/bin/ld.exe to /usr/bin/ld-old.exe.
3. I copies ld-new.exe to /usr/bin.
The debug session that starts when ld crashes repeats
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
over and over. It never seems to stop.
Was copying l
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:35:06PM -0700, Peter J. Stieber wrote:
>PS = Pete Stieber
>PS>>> Do I also need to build a debug version of the cygwin DLL?
>
>BD = Brian Dessent
>BD>>It would help, since otherwise backtraces will only have raw
>BD>> addresses. Note that the cygwin configure script[*] ha
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:33:46PM -0700, Peter J. Stieber wrote:
>1. I built the binutils code from the source.
>2. I renamed /usr/bin/ld.exe to /usr/bin/ld-old.exe.
>3. I copies ld-new.exe to /usr/bin.
>
>The debug session that starts when ld crashes repeats
>
>Program received signal SIGSEGV, Se
OK. This time gdb seemed to attach to the broken ld process, but the
back trace still doesn't have symbols...
GNU gdb 6.3.50_2004-12-28-cvs (cygwin-special)
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
are
welcome to chan
CGF> It is useless. You probaby have to continue
CGF> after ld has been attached to see where the
CGF> SEGV really is coming from.
Thanks. Here is the result...
GNU gdb 6.3.50_2004-12-28-cvs (cygwin-special)
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU
> uw-imap (whose maintainer, AFAICS, has yet to respond to reply to
> Corinna's message) is vulnerable to remote overflow of a buffer in the
> IMAP server leading to execution of arbitrary code.
>
> The only solution is to upgrade to 2004g (current Cygwin release is
> 2002e!).
I built 2004g and
One last post before calling it a night. I built a debug version of the
cygwin DLL as well and installed it. Here is the latest gdb session:
Attaching to program `/bin/ld.exe', process 304
[Switching to thread 304.0x990]
(gdb) bt
#0 0x7c901231 in ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg ()
from /cygdrive/c/W
54 matches
Mail list logo
