Error "getpeername: Operation not permitted"...

Hello, Cygwin friends, we are trying to run OpenSSH with the newest cygwin1.dll (V.1005.23.0.0; 1.5.23-cr-0x5f1) under Windows Server 2003 SP1, but get the following error message while connecting by key authentication: debug1: getpeername: Operation not permitted We checked all file and syste

Re: bug with built-in commands in bash when redirecting output

On 2007-01-27 21:33:08, Eric Blake wrote: > Meanwhile, have you considered using the cygwin-specific igncr shellopt? No, I haven't, and it's not really an option in real life. I found the problem with a libtool-generated script and I'd have to change that script in order to pass the option. I'm

Re: ln -s exe magic (coreutils 6.7-2)

On Jan 23 20:36, Christopher Layne wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > /usr/sbin: ls -l sendmail* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 p-humblet sw 13 Jan 23 17:40 sendmail -> /usr/bin/exim* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 p-humblet sw 19 Jan 23 17:29 sendmail.exe -> > > /usr/sbin/ssmtp.e

Re: Error "getpeername: Operation not permitted"...

On Jan 24 09:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, Cygwin friends, > > we are trying to run OpenSSH with the newest cygwin1.dll (V.1005.23.0.0; > 1.5.23-cr-0x5f1) under Windows Server 2003 SP1, but get the following > error message while connecting by key authentication: > > debug1: getpeername

Re: Perl bug?

On Jan 23 12:39, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > [...] > Right, *each* x operation has it's own target. If you undef $a, $b, etc. > at the end and wrap the whole thing in a for (1..2) loop, you'll see the > second time round that space is only allocated once per statement. > Or just have one x op

Antwort: Re: Error "getpeername: Operation not permitted"...

Hello, the file permissions of ws2_32.dll und ws2help.dll seems to be correct: C:\>ls -al c:\WINDOWS\system32\ws2_32.dll -rwxrwxrwx 1 a00porz GA_ADM_OpenSSH-Benutzer 83968 Mar 24 2005 c:\WINDOWS\system32\ws2_32.dll C:\>ls -al c:\WINDOWS\system32\ws2help.dll -rwxrwxrwx 1 a00porz GA_ADM_OpenSSH-

Re: bug with built-in commands in bash when redirecting output

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Sjoerd Mullender on 1/24/2007 2:00 AM: > On 2007-01-27 21:33:08, Eric Blake wrote: >> Meanwhile, have you considered using the cygwin-specific igncr shellopt? > > No, I haven't, and it's not really an option in real life. I found the > p

Re: ln -s exe magic (coreutils 6.7-2)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Pierre A. Humblet on 1/23/2007 4:07 PM: > When a user runs exim-config, the following line is executed: >ln -s -f /usr/bin/exim /usr/sbin/sendmail > > Do you want to link /usr/sbin/sendmail to /usr/sbin/ssmtp (y/N)? y > and it runs >

Re: ln -s exe magic (coreutils 6.7-2)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Corinna Vinschen on 1/24/2007 2:48 AM: > > This looks rather like a problem with the exe magic in coreutils. FWIW, > I never liked the idea to create "foo.exe.lnk" symlinks. They only slow > down the symlink processing in Cygwin. Shoul

Re: ln -s exe magic (coreutils 6.7-2)

On Jan 24 06:45, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Corinna Vinschen on 1/24/2007 2:48 AM: > > This looks rather like a problem with the exe magic in coreutils. FWIW, > > I never liked the idea to create "foo.exe.lnk" symlinks. They only slow > > down the symlink processing in Cygwin. > > Should w

Re: Antwort: Re: Error "getpeername: Operation not permitted"...

On Jan 24 11:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [...] >Jeder:(special access:) > READ_CONTROL > SYNCHRONIZE > FILE_GENERIC_READ >

Re: Antwort: Re: Error "getpeername: Operation not permitted"...

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 03:42:51PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > What else could be the reason? > > Hmm, good question. I have a stock 2K3 Server installation running > ssh just fine. Probably you will have to look outside of Cygwin. Do > you have any personal firewall or virus scanner ins

Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Error "getpeername: Operation not permitted"...

Hi, I do not believe it is a privilege separation problem. With OpenSSH v.3.7p1 run everything fine. It was with cygwin1.dll (v.1005.4.0.0; file version: 1.5.4) on the same(!) Windows Server 2003 machine and with the same sshd_config file: My actual settings are: sshd_config (important parts)

Re: Best Windows Malware Ever!

Besides not being a cygwin util (as others have mentioned), whenever I see someone posting an unsolicited, out-of-any-context advertisement (spam) like this, my first thought is that someone is trying to induce me to install their new "trojan" (or keylogger, bot-sw, etc). Of course if they post t

Re: Best Windows Malware Ever!

Linda Walsh wrote: Besides not being a cygwin util (as others have mentioned), whenever I see someone posting an unsolicited, out-of-any-context advertisement (spam) like this, my first thought is that someone is trying to induce me to install their new "trojan" (or keylogger, bot-sw, etc). Of c

Re: Perl inefficiency...

$a="a"; (uses 2 Bytes) $a="a" * 100Meg; (uses 200MB) $b="b" * 100Meg; ... I may be reading this incorrectly, but I don't think the question is why storage for the separate strings "$a", "$b" isn't freed, but why would perl use 2 bytes/character? I thought perl used UTF-8 internally(?).

make keeps an open handle to a file, can't delete parent directory

Hi, I am having a problem with GNU make 3.81 on cygwin 1.5.22. It looks like a problem with cygwin and not make, but I am not sure exactly what's causing it. I reduced my makefile to a minimal testcase and attached it to this email. The makefile creates a foo/bar/ directory and then tries to remo

Re: Perl inefficiency...

Linda Walsh tlinx.org> writes: > I understand perl may not be as efficient in data storage as > C, but seems like expanding a 100MB string to take 200MB is > wasting 100MB. > > Is this what you were referring to, Corinna? No, the inefficiency is that it stores the 100MB string in two separate p

Ruby GUI toolkits?

Hi all -- I've been beating myself up with trying to get WxRuby2 or FXRuby to install under Cygwin. I've tried the gems, but I get either a permission error or load error with the .so binaries (perhaps because they're designed for the one click windows installer). So, are there any GUI toolkit

Re: make keeps an open handle to a file, can't delete parent directory

Alexander Sotirov wrote: Hi, I am having a problem with GNU make 3.81 on cygwin 1.5.22. It looks like a problem with cygwin and not make, but I am not sure exactly what's causing it. I reduced my makefile to a minimal testcase and attached it to this email. The makefile creates a foo/bar/ direc

Re: Ruby GUI toolkits?

Mail User wrote: Hi all -- I've been beating myself up with trying to get WxRuby2 or FXRuby to install under Cygwin. I've tried the gems, but I get either a permission error or load error with the .so binaries (perhaps because they're designed for the one click windows installer). This is Win

Re: Ruby GUI toolkits?

Larry Hall (Cygwin) reply-to-list-only-lh-at-cygwin.com |Cygwin Mailing List| wrote: > This is Windows, not *NIX. The Windows loader doesn't know what to do > with a *.so file. You'll need to rename it *.dll. Hmm. I installed the wxruby2-preview 0.0.38 (i386-mswin32) binaries via gem. >From Ru

Re: make keeps an open handle to a file, can't delete parent directory

Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > That's a Windowsism. You should see better results with a recent snapshot: > > > > It would be great if you tested your case with a snapshot and report back > your findings. The latest snapshot (Jan 18, 2006) has the same bug. The test

Re: Ruby GUI toolkits?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > This is Windows, not *NIX. The Windows loader doesn't know what to do > with a *.so file. You'll need to rename it *.dll. Ruby and Apache2 modules use the .so extension, even on Win32. Yaakov -BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR

Re: Ruby GUI toolkits?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mail User wrote: > Hi all -- I've been beating myself up with trying to get WxRuby2 or > FXRuby to install under Cygwin. I've tried the gems, but I get > either a permission error or load error with the .so binaries > perhaps because they're design