On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:11:54AM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Vinod Gupta wrote:
>
> > Cygwin was a slow by a factor of 3x. Is that normal?
>
> Yes. Emulation of POSIX functions which do not exist on Windows is
> expensive. Fork is especially bad, which is all you're really testing
> there.
> Looks like the driver works, but the invocation of cc1plus is failing.
>
>> $ cygcheck /usr/bin/gcc
>
> That all looked ok. What do you see from "cygcheck
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/cc1plus.exe"?
>
$ cygcheck /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/cc1plus.exe
C:/Cygwin/lib/gcc/i
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:20:15 Francis wrote:
>
> Ehud:
Please mail to the list, not to me ONLY.
> I apologize for being an inexperienced cygwin user, but how would I
> restrict the SSH user to one command only? Which command would PuTTY use
> to tunnel through to a remote host?
Please read the `s
Martin Sebor wrote:
I've observed the following message with the latest Cygwin running on
Vista:
7 [sig] emacs 2476 C:\cygwin\bin\emacs.exe: *** fatal error - called
with threadlist_ix -1
Both times emacs was idle and not being used when it happened, although
there were other running processe
On 03/03/2007, David Abrahams wrote:
Brian Dessent dessent net> writes:
> > and if so, launch it as "sh.exe -c python", using sh.exe in the same
> > dir as the shortcut. This will invoke python through the shell,
> > which will follow symlinks.
Ja; except that that begs the question -- sh.ex
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 07:21:15PM +, Pedro Alves wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>? Maybe we're not talking about the same thing but I don't see why it
>>matters what the order of function calls is. If the inferior process
>>has already responded to a CTRL-C you don't want it to get ano
Christopher Faylor wrote:
? Maybe we're not talking about the same thing but I don't see why it
matters what the order of function calls is. If the inferior process
has already responded to a CTRL-C you don't want it to get another
interrupt.
Yep, we were not talking about the same thing
On 04 March 2007 09:42, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Igor Peshansky, le Sat 03 Mar 2007 23:05:31 -0500, a écrit :
>>> Isn't there a way to have a working javac command by just installing
>>> cygwin packages, or installing SUN's jdk is necessary?
>>
>> The scripts will translate Cygwin paths
On 04 March 2007 03:59, Bogus Bill wrote:
Subject line edited, this is NOT an announcement.
> I have the same problem. I tried to compile the requisite "Hello, world!"
> program, but gcc didn't give any messages, nor generate any output. Here
> are the specifics:
> $ g++ -v hello.cpp
> Thr
Hi,
Igor Peshansky, le Sat 03 Mar 2007 23:05:31 -0500, a écrit :
> > Isn't there a way to have a working javac command by just installing
> > cygwin packages, or installing SUN's jdk is necessary?
>
> The scripts will translate Cygwin paths for you into Windows paths... The
> native Windows vers
10 matches
Mail list logo