RE: CygWin and email clients

Thank you for your response -- I will look into mutt. In the meantime, I was able to tweak ssmtp to take attachments (even inlining graphics,) flexibly work on different ports from the command line as well as support TLS. ...One of those days/nights of rampant creativity. :) If anyone is intere

Re: Puzzling local share permissions problem with ssh sessions on Win2K3

Shankar Unni wrote: Shankar Unni wrote: My login groups are incomplete. I just saw this post: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00129.html Is this situation still present in the latest (1.5.24) Cygwin? WAG: Have you done mkgroup -d >> /etc/group? -- ClearSCM, Inc. Andrew DeFaria, Presi

Re: using Cygwin (-mno-cygwin) to JNI to a 3rd party DLL

On 05/01/2007, Pete Flugstad wrote: > On 5/1/07, Brian Dessent wrote: . Thanks, > > You'll have to run this in a debugger to be sure, but I'd start looking > > at calling convention clashes, i.e. stdc

Re: missing functions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Samuel Thibault on 5/1/2007 5:02 PM: > Eric Blake, le Tue 01 May 2007 22:55:11 +, a écrit : >> I noticed a couple of functions that cause link errors even though they are >> required by POSIX (or at least will be required by the next

Re: Successfull Build of gcc on Cygwin WinXp SP2

Aaron Gray wrote: Thank you. I am a bit unsure of where abouts (what directory) do you install the snapshot ? Again, this has nothing to do with gcc, take it the Cygwin list. If you are using the full snapshots (cygwin-inst-$date.tar.bz2) they should be unpacked in the root (/). The other t

Re: missing functions

Eric Blake, le Tue 01 May 2007 22:55:11 +, a écrit : > I noticed a couple of functions that cause link errors even though they are > required by POSIX (or at least will be required by the next version of > POSIX), > implemented by newlib, and declared in the headers: > > _Exit > dprintf Mm

missing functions

I noticed a couple of functions that cause link errors even though they are required by POSIX (or at least will be required by the next version of POSIX), implemented by newlib, and declared in the headers: _Exit dprintf There is also a big list of integer-only and reentrant variants of *printf

Re: using Cygwin (-mno-cygwin) to JNI to a 3rd party DLL

On 5/1/07, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You'll have to run this in a debugger to be sure, but I'd start looking at calling convention clashes, i.e. stdcall vs cdecl. This should be a function of the header files and how they declare prototypes. The thing that's odd is that without

Re: Puzzling local share permissions problem with ssh sessions on Win2K3

Shankar Unni wrote: My login groups are incomplete. I just saw this post: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00129.html Is this situation still present in the latest (1.5.24) Cygwin? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.

Re: newlib?: pow function can produce incorrect results.

Patch generated and applied to newlib CVS. As an added bonus I fixed a few other inconsistencies in acos(), asin(), log() and log10(). Cary __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -

Re: using Cygwin (-mno-cygwin) to JNI to a 3rd party DLL

Pete Flugstad wrote: > But when I add the 3rd party DLL calls back in (and link against the > link lib), > everything links OK, but when I try and run it, I get an error from the JVM: > >Load Error: myJni.dll: Invalid access to memory location > java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:

using Cygwin (-mno-cygwin) to JNI to a 3rd party DLL

Hello, We have a 3rd party Windows DLL that we want to interface with from Java, obviously using JNI. The 3rd party DLL provides a link lib to link against. It's a pure C interface (no C++). I've used the 3rd party DLL just fine for a while now from MSVC (ver 6), but now we want to call it fr

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Thorsten Kampe (Tue, 1 May 2007 20:49:59 +0100) > * Brian Dessent (Tue, 01 May 2007 12:25:15 -0700) > > Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > > What about this "winsymlinks" Cygwin environment variable? The > > > description says "if set, Cygwin creates symlinks as Windows shortcuts > > > with a special head

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Brian Dessent (Tue, 01 May 2007 12:25:15 -0700) > Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > What about this "winsymlinks" Cygwin environment variable? The > > description says "if set, Cygwin creates symlinks as Windows shortcuts > > with a special header and the R/O attribute set. If not set, Cygwin > > creates

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

Thorsten Kampe wrote: > What about this "winsymlinks" Cygwin environment variable? The > description says "if set, Cygwin creates symlinks as Windows shortcuts > with a special header and the R/O attribute set. If not set, Cygwin > creates symlinks as plain files with a magic number, a path and th

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Jason Tishler (Tue, 01 May 2007 14:32:06 -0400) > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:21:25AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > OTOH, I still don't see any reason not to tell people "you have to run > > bash first if you want to use python". > > This is the solution that I prefer. I think the best so

Re: Puzzling local share permissions problem with ssh sessions on Win2K3

Shankar Unni wrote: Dave Korn wrote: cygcheck.out: CYGWIN = 'ntsec' Perhaps you need smbntsec as well? Thanks! That did it.. Alas, that didn't *quite* do it. I finally figured out that I had to uninstall and re-install (ssh-host-config) the sshd service, with CYGWIN=ntsec smbntsec. The

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:21:25AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > OTOH, I still don't see any reason not to tell people "you have to run > bash first if you want to use python". This is the solution that I prefer. > I believe that the vast majority of people who use Cygwin always > invoke cli

Re: Cygwin build documentation error.

Aaron Gray wrote: I am getting errors on building Cygwin. It appears to be something to do with the documentation. Am I missing something simple such as a package like cygwin-doc and if so where do I get it ? Error text below... Many thanks in advance, [...] `/usr/build/cygwin/i686-pc-cygwin

Re: Cygwin build documentation error.

Aaron Gray wrote: > I am getting errors on building Cygwin. It appears to be something to do > with the documentation. > > Am I missing something simple such as a package like cygwin-doc and if so > where do I get it ? > > Error text below... > > Many thanks in advance, > [...] `/usr/build/cygw

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:30:59PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >* Christopher Faylor (Tue, 1 May 2007 10:22:58 -0400) >>On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:59:20PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >>>* Eric Blake (Tue, 01 May 2007 07:27:49 -0600) According to Thorsten Kampe on 5/1/2007 7:11 AM: >Both t

RE: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On 01 May 2007 15:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 01 May 2007 14:59, Charles Wilson wrote: >>> Because python is a command interpreter, > >>> Similarly, sh.exe >> >> I think these are two very strong arguments in favour. > > pytho

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: On 01 May 2007 14:59, Charles Wilson wrote: Because python is a command interpreter, Similarly, sh.exe I think these are two very strong arguments in favour. python.exe isn't anything like the interactive

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: naim-0.11.8.2.1-2

Note: Package change, no upstream changes. PACKAGE DESCRIPTION === naim - A console AIM, ICQ, IRC, and Lily client Homepage: http://naim.n.ml.org/ Version : 0.11.8.2.1 License : GPL naim is a console client for AOL Instant Messenger (AIM), AOL I Seek You (ICQ), Internet Relay C

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Christopher Faylor (Tue, 1 May 2007 10:22:58 -0400) > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:59:20PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > >* Eric Blake (Tue, 01 May 2007 07:27:49 -0600) > >>According to Thorsten Kampe on 5/1/2007 7:11 AM: > >>>Both things are actually the same under Cygwin (tested on my FAT32 > >>

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >On 01 May 2007 14:59, Charles Wilson wrote: >>Because python is a command interpreter, >>Similarly, sh.exe > >I think these are two very strong arguments in favour. python.exe isn't anything like the interactive shell that people use on

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:59:20PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >* Eric Blake (Tue, 01 May 2007 07:27:49 -0600) >>According to Thorsten Kampe on 5/1/2007 7:11 AM: >>>Both things are actually the same under Cygwin (tested on my FAT32 >>>flash drive and under Windows XP NTFS). >> >>True only for FAT

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:59:24AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Before you do this, I have a question. Why is this important now when >>you've >>apparently been doing this for many years? This isn't the only package >>which >>makes symlinks to executables. And, sin

RE: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On 01 May 2007 14:59, Charles Wilson wrote: > Because python is a command interpreter, > Similarly, sh.exe I think these are two very strong arguments in favour. I note that we already (appear to?) do the same for perl. (/me remembers back to the insane gyrations I had to go through a c

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Eric Blake (Tue, 01 May 2007 07:27:49 -0600) > According to Thorsten Kampe on 5/1/2007 7:11 AM: > > Both things are actually the same under Cygwin (tested on my FAT32 > > flash drive and under Windows XP NTFS). > > True only for FAT and FAT32, which don't support hard links at all. > > > NTFS

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

Christopher Faylor wrote: Before you do this, I have a question. Why is this important now when you've apparently been doing this for many years? This isn't the only package which makes symlinks to executables. And, since, AFAIK, setup.exe doesn't understand hard links it means that you really

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:50:31AM -0400, Lev Bishop wrote: >On 5/1/07, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:23AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >>>OK. Should I copy or make a hard link? >> >>Before you do this, I have a question. Why is this important now when >>you've apparen

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On 5/1/07, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:23AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >OK. Should I copy or make a hard link? Before you do this, I have a question. Why is this important now when you've apparently been doing this for many years? This isn't the only package whic

Re: display ps command line parameters

On Tue, 1 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > All, > Thanks for your replies. > > > An alternative would be to parse /proc/PID/cmdline. > > I think I'll use Tony's solution, as I don't have pstree available on my > "development" or "live" Cygwin installation. This would be quicker as I can > use

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:23AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:58:57PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >> I just found out that in the standard Cygwin Python setup it is not >> possible to run the Python interpreter from a Win32 command shell. >> (You get an error about t

Re: display ps command line parameters

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:41:19AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> An alternative would be to parse /proc/PID/cmdline. >I think I'll use Tony's solution, as I don't have pstree available on my >"development" or "live" Cygwin installation. This would be quicker as I can >use it straight "out of

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Thorsten Kampe on 5/1/2007 7:11 AM: > Both things are actually the same under Cygwin (tested on my FAT32 > flash drive and under Windows XP NTFS). True only for FAT and FAT32, which don't support hard links at all. > NTFS supports hard

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Jason Tishler (Tue, 01 May 2007 08:06:23 -0400) > On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:58:57PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > I just found out that in the standard Cygwin Python setup it is not > > possible to run the Python interpreter from a Win32 command shell. > > (You get an error about the NTVDM

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:58:57PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > I just found out that in the standard Cygwin Python setup it is not > possible to run the Python interpreter from a Win32 command shell. > (You get an error about the NTVDM (NT Virtual DOS machine even when C: > \cygwin\bin is in t

Re: display ps command line parameters

All, Thanks for your replies. > An alternative would be to parse /proc/PID/cmdline. I think I'll use Tony's solution, as I don't have pstree available on my "development" or "live" Cygwin installation. This would be quicker as I can use it straight "out of the box". I was looking for exactly s