Hi,
jayachandran kamaraj wrote:
any folder created by windows inside my documents has just d-
the folder needs at least one x set.
chmod manually?
Erich
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documen
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Add support for the /etc/cron.d directory.
(with thanks to Thomas Berger)
Can you please provide (or point to) a detailed explanation of the
change and its impact?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin
Hi
I understand that cygwin does not provide glibc.
does it provide uclibc ???
if not how can i create a cross compilation tool chain.
ICE
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cyg
ICE wrote:
> I understand that cygwin does not provide glibc.
> does it provide uclibc ???
No. Cygwin itself is a libc. Therefore there is no need for any other,
nor would any other even build, since a libc is a very low level system
component.
> if not how can i create a cross compilation too
Hi there,
I'm trying to compile some C program using glib 2.0 and i have some
trouble.
Here is my command line:
gcc -I"/usr/include/glib-2.0" -l glib-2.0 TestGLib.c
First gcc told me it didn't find glibconfig.h, that happened to be in an
awkward directory, namely
/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include/
Awkw
PRIEUR Christophe RD-TECH-ISS wrote:
> Here is my command line:
> gcc -I"/usr/include/glib-2.0" -l glib-2.0 TestGLib.c
The order of arguments of your command is wrong. The linker works from
left to right, resolving undefined references as it goes. If it sees a
library specified before any objec
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
relly slow compared to MinGW which takes too much time.
'time' results confirm this. Process ti
Weird I was getting very long compile times for GCC and on using 'time'
was getting indications that make was only getting 25% of total system
time.
Sorry that was sys time was 25% of real time.
Aaron
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: h
Hi,
if I want to install a version of Cygwin without user interaction
(optimally just dropping a bunch of files via unzip), is that
feasible?
In particular: does setup.exe fiddle with the registry or other files
that can't be just overwritten as a whole?
Obviously, one might want to have PATH a
Aaron Gray wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
relly slow compared to MinGW which takes too much time.
'time' results confir
Aaron Gray wrote:
> Weird I was getting very long compile times for GCC and on using 'time' was
> getting indications that make was only getting 25% of total system time.
>
> I'll see if it is repeatable on another system.
Hint: Cygwin is slow.
Emulating fork() takes a complicated dance between
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
>>> Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
>>> ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
>>> relly slow compared to M
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:41:47AM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Aaron Gray wrote:
>
>> Weird I was getting very long compile times for GCC and on using 'time' was
>> getting indications that make was only getting 25% of total system time.
>>
>> I'll see if it is repeatable on another system.
>
>Hi
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are
relly slow compared to MinGW which t
* Christopher Faylor (Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:45:12 -0400)
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
> >>> Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the
> >>> ammount of time slice availiable.
David Kastrup wrote:
Hi,
if I want to install a version of Cygwin without user interaction
(optimally just dropping a bunch of files via unzip), is that
feasible?
In particular: does setup.exe fiddle with the registry or other files
that can't be just overwritten as a whole?
Obviously, one mig
> if I want to install a version of Cygwin without user
> interaction (optimally just dropping a bunch of files
> via unzip), is that feasible?
I do this frequently in order to have Cygwin on a USB stick. Building it
there using setup would take 2 days (even though it's USB2.0). Copying
an exis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
PRIEUR Christophe RD-TECH-ISS wrote:
> Here is my command line:
> gcc -I"/usr/include/glib-2.0" -l glib-2.0 TestGLib.c
gcc -o TestGLib.o TestGLib.c `pkg-config --cflags --libs glib-2.0`
(And for your own sake, don't move around files; everything ha
18 matches
Mail list logo
