Re: cygcheck -f ... misleading as to file ownership & no relative paths

2008-02-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Linda Walsh ha scritto: > > "cygcheck -f" doesn't work if you are in a directory > and you execute it on > files in the directory (unless you are in "/"). > I.e. it doesn't > seem to recognize relative directories. Hi Linda, you are right but there is a easy trick :-) at least if a cygwin

Re: cygcheck -f ... misleading as to file ownership & no relative paths

2008-02-23 Thread Brian Dessent
Linda Walsh wrote: > I understand why cygcheck doesn't ID the files in "/etc", and "/etc/ssh", > but it's problematic -- since I don't know for certain which files > ssh is compiled to use... If I had to guess, I'd go for /etc/ssh/..., > but "cygcheck" doesn't even classify that directory as "own

cygcheck -f ... misleading as to file ownership & no relative paths

2008-02-23 Thread Linda Walsh
"cygcheck -f" doesn't work if you are in a directory and you execute it on files in the directory (unless you are in "/"). I.e. it doesn't seem to recognize relative directories. Another "ick" ... (this isn't about "ssh", I'm just using it as an example of the problem). I have an "ssh" directo

Re: running cygcheck...empty packages?

2008-02-23 Thread Linda Walsh
Brian Dessent wrote: After they have served their function they are unnecessary. Brian Wow...very thorough response... thanks! Linda -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: ht

Re: running cygcheck...empty packages?

2008-02-23 Thread Brian Dessent
Linda Walsh wrote: > > Greetings Cygwinians, > > Was notice what appeared to be 'old' versions of some files laying > around, so wanted to verify packages -- "cygcheck -c" > > It pops up some packages that are empty. I was wondering both why > I downloaded them (?!) and whether or not I needed

running cygcheck...empty packages?

2008-02-23 Thread Linda Walsh
Greetings Cygwinians, Was notice what appeared to be 'old' versions of some files laying around, so wanted to verify packages -- "cygcheck -c" It pops up some packages that are empty. I was wondering both why I downloaded them (?!) and whether or not I needed them. Some look "important", other

Re: Issue with GDB under Cygwin and XP

2008-02-23 Thread Ray Hurst
I compiled the latest gcc and gdb and it now works under cygwin. The versions I'm using are: D:\projects\Eclipse\CDT\HelloWorld2\Debug>gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.2.3 Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warrant

Re: Building C++ program with QT under cygwin

2008-02-23 Thread hce
On 2/21/08, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21 February 2008 02:24, hce wrote: > > > I am using QT 4.3 under linux, so I guess have to download the same > > version QT to the cygwin. I guess you said yes I should install the QT > > 4.3 for Linux package under Cygwin. Please correct me.

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: [experimental] cygwin-1.5.25-8

2008-02-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
I've uploaded a test version of the Cygwin DLL and its utilities, version 1.5.25-8. The main purpose of this update is to allow Cygwin to run correctly on Windows 2008 Server. A change in the exception handling in Windows 2008 Server requires to change the exception handling in the Cygwin DLL as

Re: Win32::API for Cygwin Perl?

2008-02-23 Thread Reini Urban
Michael Kairys schrieb: It works! (But I guess you knew that :) Thanks very much. In the meantime I also added the remaining blocking patch for the latest release 0.49 to the tracker. Win32-API-0.50 can then be installed via CPAN (hopefully). http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=3170