Hello Jonathon,
On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:59:38 -0400, Jonathon Merz jonathon.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Per Dave Korn's suggestion in:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00208.html
- If setup.exe exits while in a maximized state, it will be
maximized on next startup,
On 5/15/2009 12:25 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
At any rate, I'm rather tired of several YEARS of choosing the
'Exp'erimental version of emacs from setup.exe, all because 22.1-3 works
better for me than the 'Stable' version. I'm all for whatever you
provide, and will be grateful for whatever you
Hi Chris,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Chris January wrote:
You really ought to be using Get/SetWindowPlacement rather than
GetWindowPos, IsZoomed etc.
GetWindowPlacement works in workspace coordinates, whereas GetWindowPos
works with screen coordinates so your code won't work properly
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:24:56AM -0400, Jonathon Merz wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Chris January wrote:
You really ought to be using Get/SetWindowPlacement rather than
GetWindowPos, IsZoomed etc.
GetWindowPlacement works in workspace coordinates, whereas GetWindowPos
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:04:10AM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 5/15/2009 12:25 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
At any rate, I'm rather tired of several YEARS of choosing the
'Exp'erimental version of emacs from setup.exe, all because 22.1-3 works
better for me than the 'Stable' version. I'm all for
On 5/15/2009 10:46 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
If you release a new 1.5 version now then you will have a few weeks at least
to work out any wrinkles. So, it might make sense to have a stable version of
emacs since the old version apparently had so many problems.
That sounds like a good
I think many people have copied an old announcement of mine for their
cygwin-announce messages which includes a http://sources.redhat.com/...; URL.
That name is now deprecated. Please change this URL to point to either
sourceware.org or cygwin.com as appropriate.
The reason for this is that
And, no, I'm not going to automatically add the unsubscribe message to
everything that shows up for cygwin-announce. But thanks for asking.
Since this is something that probably every person wonders about who ever
posts to cygwin-announce, perhaps it would be useful for you to restate the
Cygwin/X users,
Last fall, with Jon's technical assistance, I took on updating the
long-unmaintained Cygwin/X and released X11R7.4. Since then we have
released over 30 package updated, including six patch revisions to the
server. Work on preparing X.Org Server 1.6 and GNOME 2.26 for Cygwin
1.7
From: cygwin-xfree-ow...@cygwin.com
[mailto:cygwin-xfree-ow...@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of Jim Reisert AD1C
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 1:13 PM
I have installed Windows 7 RC1 (64-bit) as well as Cygwin 1.7,
including the Xorg stuff in the Cygwin setup-1.7.exe file
I can start the X server
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:22:23PM -0700, Mike Ayers wrote:
P.S. That was speculation. Hopefully someone will have a real answer
soon.
This was already discussed in the main cygwin list. There is a
workaround in the latest version of Cygwin 1.7.x.
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2009-05-15 11:27:41
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog wchar.h
Log message:
* wchar.h (sys_mbstowcs): Add missing __stdcall attribute.
Patches:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:23:08PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
Christopher Faylor writes:
We can't say it enough:
Read the source.
Is this a place where using vfork() instead of fork() helps (where it's
applicable, of course)? If so, we
I'm in a domain at work and previously used mkpasswd -d and mkgroup -d
to populate /etc/passwd and /etc/group files. Unfortunately, we mostly
use Russian versions of Windows (especially on servers) here and most
built-in user and group names (like Administrator, Domain Users, etc.)
are localized.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Alexey Borzenkov sna...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in a domain at work and previously used mkpasswd -d and mkgroup -d
to populate /etc/passwd and /etc/group files. Unfortunately, we mostly
use Russian versions of Windows (especially on servers) here and most
On May 15 11:43, Alexey Borzenkov wrote:
I'm in a domain at work and previously used mkpasswd -d and mkgroup -d
to populate /etc/passwd and /etc/group files. Unfortunately, we mostly
use Russian versions of Windows (especially on servers) here and most
built-in user and group names (like
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Alexey Borzenkov sna...@gmail.com wrote:
And I found why. It appears that there's a bug in printf with %ls that
will refuse to print the string completely if the wide string for %ls
cannot be represented in current charset.
[...]
Prints nothing, i.e. it
On May 15 13:30, Alexey Borzenkov wrote:
[...]
It appears that there's a bug in printf with %ls that
will refuse to print the string completely if the wide string for %ls
cannot be represented in current charset. It's interesting that
sometimes it behaves differently. For example:
$
On May 14 13:54, Karl M wrote:
From: corinna
It's not running scripts as administrators.none, it's running them as
user.users-primary-group. That's None for all local accounts.
Is this setup behavior expected to stay the same, or eventually run
them as administrator.administrators?
It
On May 15 13:49, Alexey Borzenkov wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Alexey Borzenkov sna...@gmail.com wrote:
And I found why. It appears that there's a bug in printf with %ls that
will refuse to print the string completely if the wide string for %ls
cannot be represented in current
2009/5/15 Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com:
I have just trouble with SJIS, but that's not something I can easily
test. Maybe you can look into that in the next couple of days?
Maybe I can. Please explain details of the trouble.
--
IWAMURO Motnori http://vmi.jp/
--
Unsubscribe info:
On May 14 17:51, Jeff Johnston wrote:
Corinna, I have no problem with checking the new patch in and extending
this later, assuming you have thoroughly tested this implementation.
I tested it with _MB_CAPABLE defined and with _MB_CAPABLE undefined.
Both variations worked as expected, the
On May 15 20:34, IWAMURO Motonori wrote:
2009/5/15 Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com:
I have just trouble with SJIS, but that's not something I can easily
test. Maybe you can look into that in the next couple of days?
Maybe I can. Please explain details of the trouble.
Probably I
New experimental versions of the emacs, emacs-X11, and emacs-el packages
are now available for download for those testing cygwin 1.7, replacing
the previous experimental 22.1-3 packages. I have left 21.2-13 as current.
CYGWIN NEWS:
This is the first release in almost two years,
On 5/15/2009 9:09 AM, gustav wrote:
Dear Ken,
First, thank you so much for having taken care of Emacs!
I enclose a patch to rmail.el, which I always have to apply, because
version 21.2 normally attempts to create files with po:, but neither
Windows nor Cygwin tolerate that. Current rmail.el
Hi folks,
I just uploaded a new Cygwin 1.7 test release, 1.7.0-48.
The list with the changes related to the previous test release 1.7.0-47
is attached below.
===
IMPORTANT NOTE
This -48 test release
Hello,
How can a shellscript be called from the Windows cmd console using Cygwin,
i. e. by which command, options and arguments has Cygwin to be called to run
a shellscript, e. g. myscript.sh?
Thomas Wiedmann
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Thomas Wiedmann th...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
How can a shellscript be called from the Windows cmd console using Cygwin,
i. e. by which command, options and arguments has Cygwin to be called to run
a shellscript, e. g. myscript.sh?
Thomas Wiedmann
What I have
Hi,
I was trying to build some package and it complained that libtool 1.4
was needed... looking at the version:
$ libtool --version
libtool (GNU libtool 1.3081 2009-02-17) 2.2.7a
Is it 1.3081 or 2.2.7a?
I see at gnu.org that the latest stable is 2.2.6a, so I suppose the one
in Cygwin (1.7) is
René Berber wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to build some package and it complained that libtool 1.4
was needed... looking at the version:
$ libtool --version
libtool (GNU libtool 1.3081 2009-02-17) 2.2.7a
Is it 1.3081 or 2.2.7a?
It is 2.2.7a. You can see that from the announcement here:
Charles Wilson wrote:
[snip]
So, next time, kindly refrain from accusing my package of insanity. But
while we're on the subject...libtool-1.4 dates from 27-Nov-2003, more
than 5.5 years ago...
Thanks for all the info. I learned something new.
As for the old version, that's just a
(This mail is encoded in utf-8)
After tested with 1.7.0-48, many problems are eliminated.
But cygpath doesn't return good pathnames, see:
1, Get absolute path of current directory:
C:\Profiles\Shecti\桌面 set LANG=zh_CN.GBK cygpath -am .
C:/Profiles/Shecti/桌面 (good)
New experimental versions of the emacs, emacs-X11, and emacs-el packages
are now available for download for those testing cygwin 1.7, replacing
the previous experimental 22.1-3 packages. I have left 21.2-13 as current.
CYGWIN NEWS:
This is the first release in almost two years,
Hi folks,
I just uploaded a new Cygwin 1.7 test release, 1.7.0-48.
The list with the changes related to the previous test release 1.7.0-47
is attached below.
===
IMPORTANT NOTE
This -48 test release
34 matches
Mail list logo
