Re: ssh ... PTY allocation request failed on channel 0

On 1 March 2011 03:33, Mirko Vukovic wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Rafael Kitover <...> wrote: I am trying to ssh to g...@github.com, and I get the error "PTY allocation request failed on channel 0" >> ... >> >> That message is coming from github.com, it does not allow openin

Re: Doubtful about unison

On 28 February 2011 19:52, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 28.02.2011 20:31, schrieb Olivier Lefevre: > >> Yes but no danger here: it dies right away with an error popup that >> says "The program entry point [I am translating from the german; I >> might be a little off] "__ctype_ptr__" was not found in

Re: Please test latest developer snapshot

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:09:44PM -0800, David Rothenberger wrote: >On 2/25/2011 3:24 PM, David Rothenberger wrote: >> I realize this report won't be terribly useful, but I did encounter >> a problem with the latest snapshot. I have a local git >> repository. With the snapshot, "git log" produces:

Re: ssh ... PTY allocation request failed on channel 0

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:33:36PM -0500, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Rafael Kitover <...> wrote: >> On 2/28/2011 8:51 PM, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Mirko Vukovic wrote: Hello, I am trying to ssh to g...@github.com, and I get

Re: ssh ... PTY allocation request failed on channel 0

On 2/28/2011 8:45 PM, Mirko Vukovic wrote: googling I found references to devices ptmx and pts. There is a /dev/ptmx. I can see it if I do ls /dev/ptmx but not if I do ls /dev (why?). -- Larry _

Re: ssh ... PTY allocation request failed on channel 0

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Rafael Kitover <...> wrote: > On 2/28/2011 8:51 PM, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying to ssh to g...@github.com, and I get the error >>> "PTY allocation request failed on channel 0" > ... > >

Re: Windows OS and uname; compatability

On 2/28/2011 11:49 AM, Fergus wrote: > Thanks to a previous responder I now know that in response to uname: > NT-5.0 = W2000 > NT-5.1 = XP > NT-6.0 = Vista > NT-6.1 = W7 That's very oversimplified, as the links posted by Barry B. will tell you. One thing you CAN do is use /usr/lib/csih/winProd

Re: ssh ... PTY allocation request failed on channel 0

On 2/28/2011 8:51 PM, Mirko Vukovic wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to ssh to g...@github.com, and I get the error >> "PTY allocation request failed on channel 0" ... That message is coming from github.com, it does not allow opening intera

Re: ssh ... PTY allocation request failed on channel 0

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Mirko Vukovic wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to ssh to g...@github.com, and I get the error > "PTY allocation request failed on channel 0" > > I tried ssh -vv ..., but did not see anything meaningful. > > googling I found references to devices ptmx and pts. > > The

ssh ... PTY allocation request failed on channel 0

Hello, I am trying to ssh to g...@github.com, and I get the error "PTY allocation request failed on channel 0" I tried ssh -vv ..., but did not see anything meaningful. googling I found references to devices ptmx and pts. There is a /dev/ptmx. I can see it if I do ls /dev/ptmx but not if I do

Re: Doubtful about unison

Am 28.02.2011 20:31, schrieb Olivier Lefevre: > Yes but no danger here: it dies right away with an error popup that > says "The program entry point [I am translating from the german; I > might be a little off] "__ctype_ptr__" was not found in cygwin1.dll" > > Looks like it was wrongly linked or c

Re: GNUPLOT in Cygwin: Terminal type set to 'unknown'

Den 2011-02-24 14:00 skrev Keith Christian: > There is lots of additional good gnuplot info on the WWW. > > Fast answer: > > gnuplot> set terminal dumb > Terminal type set to 'dumb' > Options are 'feed size 79, 24' > gnuplot> plot sin(x) > > A (crude) graph of sin(x) should now be on the termin

Re: Doubtful about unison

Hm. Okay, what if you run `strace /usr/bin/unison-2.32 -version`? I had forgotten about that. I used truss a lot in the past but I didn't know Cygwin had an equivalent. > Please be careful when posting strace clips to the list - the overall > strace can be quite huge Yes but no danger here: i

Re: Doubtful about unison

On 02/28/2011 10:35 AM, Andrew Schulman wrote: > Hm. Okay, what if you run `strace /usr/bin/unison-2.32 -version`? When I > do that, around line 375 of the output I see > > 6657 90249 [main] unison-2.32 5424 fhandler_base::write: binary write > unison version 2.32.52 > > I'm not very knowled

Re: Doubtful about unison

> > Try `cygcheck /usr/bin/unison-2.32`. > > Now I get: > C:\cygwin/bin\unison-2.32.exe >C:\cygwin/bin\cygwin1.dll > C:\WINDOWS\system32\ADVAPI32.DLL >C:\WINDOWS\system32\KERNEL32.dll > C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll >C:\WINDOWS\system32\RPCRT4.dll > C:\WI

RE: Windows OS and uname; compatability

Fergus sent the following at Monday, February 28, 2011 11:50 AM >Thanks to a previous responder I now know that in response to uname: >NT-5.0 = W2000 NT-5.1 = XP NT-6.0 = Vista NT-6.1 = W7 >Q1 Can anybody please tell me the corresponding information for W98? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sou

Windows OS and uname; compatability

Thanks to a previous responder I now know that in response to uname: NT-5.0 = W2000 NT-5.1 = XP NT-6.0 = Vista NT-6.1 = W7 Q1 Can anybody please tell me the corresponding information for W98? Q2 Are there ways of distinguishing between XP / XP-64, Vista / Vista-64, W7 / W7-64 using uname in Cygw

Re: Doubtful about unison

Try `cygcheck /usr/bin/unison-2.32`. Now I get: C:\cygwin/bin\unison-2.32.exe C:\cygwin/bin\cygwin1.dll C:\WINDOWS\system32\ADVAPI32.DLL C:\WINDOWS\system32\KERNEL32.dll C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll C:\WINDOWS\system32\RPCRT4.dll C:\WINDOWS\system32\Secur32.dll

Re: next release?

On 2/27/2011 10:24 PM, Ken wrote: Hello, Firstly, thank you to the Cygwin team for all of your labor on, and dedication to, this project! It has been quite a while since cygwin 1.7.7-1 was released (Aug 31, 2010) and there have been a lot of snapshot updates since that time. Would you happen to

Re: Doubtful about unison

> On 2/28/2011 7:06 AM, René Berber wrote: > > Use cygcheck `which unison` to see what's missing. > > Thanks, I didn't know that command. cygcheck says: > "C:\cygwin/bin\unison - Cannot open" Still in the > dark... Try `cygcheck /usr/bin/unison-2.32`. /usr/bin/unison should be just a symlink to

Re: Doubtful about unison

> I just installed unison 2.32 and I am a bit doubtful because > 'unison', 'unison -version' and 'unison -help' don't print > anything at all (they do on my Linux box). Is it expected? No, on my host I get $ unison -version unison version 2.32.52 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/prob

Re: Doubtful about unison

On 2/28/2011 7:06 AM, René Berber wrote: Use cygcheck `which unison` to see what's missing. Thanks, I didn't know that command. cygcheck says: "C:\cygwin/bin\unison - Cannot open" Still in the dark... -- O.L. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: ht

Re: Fortran program error message

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Gery Herbozo Jimenez wrote: > > Dear Users, > > I can't run the following fortran script in my cygwin bash, I'm getting the > following error message: Gery, it is not a cygwin problem. You must learn Fortran (at least a bit) > $ g77 geometry.f -o geometry geome

Fortran program error message

Dear Users, I can't run the following fortran script in my cygwin bash, I'm getting the following error message: $ g77 geometry.f -o geometry /cygdrive/c/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/CONFIG~1/Temp/ccmHGeab.o:geometry.f:(.text+0x82d): undefined reference to `_zspl3_' /cygdrive/c/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/C