neon: upset errors

2011-11-15 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Tue, 2011-11-15, upset was true to its name and complained: upset: *** setup.ini: warning - package libneon26 refers to non-existent external-source: neon Dr. Volker Zell, Apparently you did some pruning in release/neon, but now there is no source package for libneon26-0.26.4-1. Nothing

Please upload: mined-2011.19-0

2011-11-15 Thread Thomas Wolff
Please upload the release update package for mined: mkdir mined cd mined wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/mined-2011.19-0.tar.bz2 wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/mined-2011.19-0-src.tar.bz2 wget

Re: frequently getting a STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION exception under win7

2011-11-15 Thread jenw
Thank you, Whatzit Toya, your solution compatibility mode/run as admin solution worked like a charm for me! -jw -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ:

winsup/cygwin ChangeLog child_info.h dcrt0.cc ...

2011-11-15 Thread cgf
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum Module name:winsup Changes by: c...@sourceware.org 2011-11-16 04:09:33 Modified files: cygwin : ChangeLog child_info.h dcrt0.cc sigproc.cc spawn.cc Log message: * child_info.h (CURR_CHILD_INFO_MAGIC):

autoconf packaging error

2011-11-15 Thread Csaba Raduly
Hi all, There seems to be a packaging error in autoconf (autoconf2.5-2.68-1 according to cygcheck -f /usr/share/man/man1/autoconf-2.68.1.gz). The shorter names for the man pages point to non-existent files: ~/workspace/TTCNv3 $ file /usr/share/man/man1/auto*

Re: autoconf packaging error

2011-11-15 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/15/2011 5:06 AM, Csaba Raduly wrote: Hi all, There seems to be a packaging error in autoconf (autoconf2.5-2.68-1 according to cygcheck -f /usr/share/man/man1/autoconf-2.68.1.gz). The shorter names for the man pages point to non-existent files: The symlinks don't appear in the output of

Re: fork problem on latest cygwin CVS

2011-11-15 Thread marco atzeri
On 11/14/2011 6:11 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: FYI, the last thing any developer wants to hear after a major code change is a generic It's broke report with no details and no way to duplicate the problem. A stack trace from a home-grown version of cygwin1.dll is not a detail. It's

[SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries?

2011-11-15 Thread Dave Korn
On 09/11/2011 12:15, Edvardsen Kåre wrote: This is again related to the failure of execution of a gfortran built binary (cannot execute binary, see thread http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-11/msg00034.html ) In short, the main problem is that I can't build a successful binary from the

Re: [SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries?

2011-11-15 Thread Ryan Johnson
On 15/11/2011 10:53 AM, Dave Korn wrote: On 09/11/2011 12:15, Edvardsen Kåre wrote: This is again related to the failure of execution of a gfortran built binary (cannot execute binary, see thread http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-11/msg00034.html ) In short, the main problem is that I can't

Re: Couldn't allocate heap - tried rebasing

2011-11-15 Thread Jesse Ziser
On 11/11/2011 12:29 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 11/11/2011 10:58 AM, Jesse Ziser wrote: Hello, Since attempting to upgrade from Cygwin 1.5 to 1.7, I'm having the problem that attempting to run various programs results in a slew of errors like the following: 1 [main] bash 4276

Re: fork problem on latest cygwin CVS

2011-11-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:04:16PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote: On 11/14/2011 6:11 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: FYI, the last thing any developer wants to hear after a major code change is a generic It's broke report with no details and no way to duplicate the problem. A stack trace from a

Problems with updating nearly any package meant for Cygwin or using packages such as libtool

2011-11-15 Thread viper_88
First of all, I would like to warn some that this message may be a bit lengthy. I installed Cygwin 1.7.9-1 mainly for the purpose of compiling and trying out THC-Hydra. I've managed to install some necessary dependencies, but other are so troublesome I just can't deal with them. The avalanche

Re: Problems with updating nearly any package meant for Cygwin or using packages such as libtool

2011-11-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 11/15/2011 2:28 PM, viper_88 wrote: The avalanche of my problems has started when I wanted to install compat-libstdc++ 33-3.2.3. The installation failed due to the following dependencies errors: error: Failed dependencies: /sbin/ldconfig is needed by compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5

shared Libary problems

2011-11-15 Thread Jim Harsh
I have a Smalltalk application that looks for a shared Library which contains C and FORTRAN routines. This shared library has been called BIEsharedLib.so regardless of the platform we run on, Windows, Linux or originally Unix. On the Windows boxes we have used the Intel compilers successfully for

Rolling back to 1.6.x Subversion

2011-11-15 Thread Sean LeBlanc
I've accidentally updated Subversion to 1.7.x on Cygwin. Is there a way to get an older package of Subversion installed? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info:

Re: shared Libary problems

2011-11-15 Thread René Berber
On 11/15/2011 3:31 PM, Jim Harsh wrote: [snip] I searched the archive and that's where I got the idea to use the -W1, --out-implib,BIEsharedLib.dll.a switch to get a .so vs a .dll file. The option is a lowercase L not a 1, i.e. -Wl,-out-implib,... (you can use one dash for double dashed

Re: shared Libary problems

2011-11-15 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/15/2011 4:31 PM, Jim Harsh wrote: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-shared' '-W1,--out-implib,BIEsharedLib.dll.a' '-o' '/cygdrive/c/BIE_work/ver747Dev/BIEsharedLib.so' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic' '-march=i686' /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/collect2.exe --wrap _Znwj --wrap _Znaj

Re: shared Libary problems

2011-11-15 Thread Tim Prince
On 11/15/2011 4:31 PM, Jim Harsh wrote: If you're depending on a specific C++ mangling to match what you've put in your build, bear in mind that no g++ will match any Visual Studio compatible C++ compiler. Normal procedure is to use extern C on the C++ side and iso_c_interop on the Fortran

Re: Why 'script' utility require SHELL (and work fine under Linux)?

2011-11-15 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Le 10/11/2011 02:05, Andrey Repin a écrit : Greetings, Cyrille Lefevre! Would defining $SHELL at a system level solve your issue? well, I'm not the one who is having the problem, I'm the one who is trying to help to solve the issue... :-) Regards, Cyrille Lefevre --

Re: Why 'script' utility require SHELL (and work fine under Linux)?

2011-11-15 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Le 08/11/2011 00:25, Cyrille Lefevre a écrit : Hi, are you working on these issues ? thanks in advance. Le 04/11/2011 21:22, David Sastre a écrit : On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:05:39AM +0100, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: the base-file maintainer has been BCC'ed to add the export SHELL to the

Re: [SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries?

2011-11-15 Thread Dave Korn
On 15/11/2011 16:20, Ryan Johnson wrote: On 15/11/2011 10:53 AM, Dave Korn wrote: On 09/11/2011 12:15, Edvardsen Kåre wrote: In short, the main problem is that I can't build a successful binary from the FLEXPART fortran code FLEXPART is one of those huge number-crunching Fortran programs