On 5/18/2013 10:59 PM, Naveen Narayanan wrote:
There are a couple of issues as well: - The group is displayed as
mkgroup. - The user "navenara" does not exist in the localhost, I
guess. It was not displayed in "net user sshd". "navenara" is a Domain
account. Could this be causing the public key
I've been trying "ssh localhost" on cygwin (I use WIndows 7), but it
keeps asking for the password.
When I did "ssh -vvv localhost", I found out that the public key
authentications were not happening (or failing). Hence, it was asking
for the password.
debug1: Authentications that can continue:
p
On 5/17/2013 9:37 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Angelo Graziosi writes:
> If someone is interested I can sent the
> config.log-success-gnutls-devel-3.1.11-1
> config.log-fail-gnutls-devel-3.2.0-1
> as archive config.logs.tar.xz (38K)
Yes please do.
Atta
Hi!
today I've updated cygwin and new cygpath prints incorrect non latin paths
$ cygpath -V
cygpath (cygwin) 1.7.18
Path Conversion Utility
Copyright (C) 1998 - 2013 Red Hat, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 04:58:18PM +, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>>" On May 17 16:45, Warren Young wrote:
>>" > On 5/17/2013 12:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>" > >
>>" > >Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
>>" >
>>" > It depends. ENOFEL is the BS
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 04:58:18PM +, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>" On May 17 16:45, Warren Young wrote:
>" > On 5/17/2013 12:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>" > >
>" > >Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
>" >
>" > It depends. ENOFEL is the BSD way, but POSIX standardized the SysV
>" > error constant, EFLOCK
" On May 17 16:45, Warren Young wrote:
" > On 5/17/2013 12:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
" > >
" > >Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
" >
" > It depends. ENOFEL is the BSD way, but POSIX standardized the SysV
" > error constant, EFLOCK. Linux supports both, of course, so Cygwin
" > should, too.
"
" Hmm.
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On May 17 16:45, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 5/17/2013 12:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >
>> >Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
>>
>> It depends. ENOFEL is the BSD way, but POSIX standardized the SysV
>> error constant, EFLOCK. Linux supports both
Ciao Volker,
someone flagged a similar issue on Emacs bug list.
You can follow:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2013-05/msg00488.html
Ciao,
Angelo.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: h
On May 17 16:45, Warren Young wrote:
> On 5/17/2013 12:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> >Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
>
> It depends. ENOFEL is the BSD way, but POSIX standardized the SysV
> error constant, EFLOCK. Linux supports both, of course, so Cygwin
> should, too.
Hmm. I'm not too keen to
10 matches
Mail list logo