I had written:
I think it is really not a good idea to have the same name for archives
of different packages. No other systems I know does this.
Christopher Faylor responded (for some reason not in my mailbox):
Just to kill two birds with one stone:
Il 8/11/2013 7:02 PM, Thomas Wolff ha scritto:
Please upload the updated packages for algol68g (both 32 and 64 bit):
...
I have managed meanwhile to package algol68g completely with cygport
(see my other thread which I will respond later) and will provide
another upload.
Update:
#src:
On Aug 14 09:40, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Il 8/11/2013 7:02 PM, Thomas Wolff ha scritto:
Please upload the updated packages for algol68g (both 32 and 64 bit):
...
I have managed meanwhile to package algol68g completely with
cygport (see my other thread which I will respond later) and will
Am 14.08.2013 09:49, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Aug 14 09:40, Thomas Wolff wrote:
...
Update:
#src:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/algol68g-2.7-0-src.tar.bz2
#32bit:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/32/algol68g-2.7-0.tar.bz2
#64bit:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/64/algol68g-2.7-0.tar.bz2
On Aug 14 10:09, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 14.08.2013 09:49, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Aug 14 09:40, Thomas Wolff wrote:
...
Update:
#src:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/algol68g-2.7-0-src.tar.bz2
#32bit:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/32/algol68g-2.7-0.tar.bz2
#64bit:
wget
On Aug 14 16:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 09:43, Steve Rowley wrote:
However, /usr/bin/lockfile is still missing. Unpacking the procmail
3.22-12 tarball reveals that it contains only the
/usr/share/doc/procmail/ directory, and 4 small documentation files.
The rest of procmail is
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:35:55AM +0200, Thomas Wolff wrote:
I had written:
I think it is really not a good idea to have the same name for archives
of different packages. No other systems I know does this.
Christopher Faylor responded (for some reason not in my mailbox):
Just to kill two birds
Christopher Faylor writes:
The only differences in most of the arch-specific packages in Fedora are
the addition of a x86_64 and i686 to the package name. I think it would
be a good idea for us to do that too but it would require changes to
upset, genini and setup.exe.
...and cygport. BTW,
LS,
packages for gsl-1.16-1 are available here for upload:
wget -nH -np -r --cut-dirs=2
http://members.quicknet.nl/ar.burgers/cygwin/x86/gsl/
find x86 -name index.html* | xargs rm
wget -nH -np -r --cut-dirs=2
http://members.quicknet.nl/ar.burgers/cygwin/x86_64/gsl/
find x86_64 -name
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
Christopher Faylor writes:
The only differences in most of the arch-specific packages in Fedora are
the addition of a x86_64 and i686 to the package name. I think it would
be a good idea for us to do that too but it would require
wget -e robots=off -np -nH --cut-dirs=1 -R'index.html*' -r \
http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/x86/release/cdrkit \
http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/x86_64/release/cdrkit
The former (x86) cdrkit package is now marked obsolete and replaced by
cdrkit-doc.
An x86_64 cdrkit package does not
On Aug 13 18:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/13/2013 2:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 13:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2013-08-13 09:13, Ken Brown wrote:
Yaakov, is there any chance that you could patch Glib to do the
equivalent of G_SLICE=always-malloc on Cygwin? This isn't really an
On Aug 14 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 18:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/13/2013 2:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 13:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2013-08-13 09:13, Ken Brown wrote:
Yaakov, is there any chance that you could patch Glib to do the
equivalent of
On 8/14/2013 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 18:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/13/2013 2:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 13:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2013-08-13 09:13, Ken Brown wrote:
Yaakov, is there any chance that you could
On Aug 14 06:28, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/14/2013 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 18:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/13/2013 2:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 13:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2013-08-13 09:13, Ken Brown wrote:
Yaakov, is
On Aug 14 12:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 06:28, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/14/2013 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 18:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/13/2013 2:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
What function is not implemented? Is that
On Aug 14 13:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 12:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 06:28, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/14/2013 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 18:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/13/2013 2:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On 8/14/2013 7:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 13:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 12:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 06:28, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/14/2013 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 18:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On
On 14/08/2013 7:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 13:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 12:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 06:28, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/14/2013 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 18:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On
On Aug 14 08:28, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 14/08/2013 7:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 13:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 12:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 06:28, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/14/2013 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On
On Aug 14 16:05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 08:28, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 14/08/2013 7:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 13:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 12:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Given that, we should perhaps skip the memalign override.
On second (third?
On 8/14/2013 8:14 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/14/2013 7:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 13:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 12:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 06:28, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/14/2013 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On
On Aug 14 11:55, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/14/2013 8:14 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/14/2013 7:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I applied the patch to allow overriding posix_memalloc only, and I'm
building snapshots right now. For testing, this requires to rebuild
either emacs, or glib, or both, I'm
Ken Brown wrote:
P.S. For anyone (like Angelo) who wants to build the emacs trunk, I need to
patch gmalloc.c upstream before the fix will take effect.
Thanks, I will wait for your patches and the Cygwin upgrade.
Corin.. oops... Mum wrote it will be released tomorrow.. ;-)
Ciao,
Angelo.
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2013-08-14 11:44:46
Modified files:
winsup/doc : ChangeLog new-features.xml
Log message:
* new-features.xml (ov-new1.7.24): Add new section. Mention
posix_memalign override.
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2013-08-14 11:44:23
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog globals.cc malloc_wrapper.cc
winsup/cygwin/include/cygwin: version.h
winsup/cygwin/include/sys: cygwin.h
On Aug 13 20:01, Jim Burwell wrote:
On 8/12/2013 7:41 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I added UTF-16 surrogate handling to the -i option and uploaded a
grep-2.14-2 package to the 64 bit release. Please give it a tests.
If it works for you, I'll send the patch upstream.
Hi,
I
On 8/13/2013 6:49 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:29:46PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 8/13/2013 5:01 PM, Steve Rowley wrote:
I just installed 64-bit Cygwin on Win7, and noticed that
/usr/bin/lockfile is missing in my installation.
As always, you can find
On Aug 14 09:43, Steve Rowley wrote:
On 8/13/2013 6:49 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:29:46PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 8/13/2013 5:01 PM, Steve Rowley wrote:
I just installed 64-bit Cygwin on Win7, and noticed that
/usr/bin/lockfile is missing in my
On 10/08/2013 2:01 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/10/2013 11:24 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 10/08/2013 9:59 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/9/2013 11:28 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 08/08/2013 2:00 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 08/08/2013 1:42 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/5/2013 11:29 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 14/08/2013 10:04 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
After a rash of crashes where I either forgot to attach gdb or forgot
to set appropriate breakpoints, I finally managed to catch the stack
trace below. It occurred during M-x compile, while emacs parsed the
compilation's rather copious output, which
On Aug 14 16:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 09:43, Steve Rowley wrote:
On 8/13/2013 6:49 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:29:46PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 8/13/2013 5:01 PM, Steve Rowley wrote:
I just installed 64-bit Cygwin on Win7, and
cygport ... prep
⇒ likely, the patch fails, of course, because sources have changed,
so why is there not a step unpack after which I would check the
patch?
trying to adapt patch
⇒ searching for patched files first, somewhere among a bunch of
directories;
origsrc good guess,
33 matches
Mail list logo
