Greetings, Andrey Repin!
> Is this the reason for behavior such as this?
> $ which -a test
> /usr/bin/test
> /usr/bin/test
Hurr... disregard this. It appears, my problem was (is) in /etc/profile, which
forces additional copy of /usr/bin to be injected into $PATH.
Whoever maintain /etc/defaults/
Greetings, All!
Started to write scripts, that rely on registry, and hit a nail right off the
bat. I need to access expanded value of REG_EXPAND_SZ type.
Reading documentation doesn't help.
Is this possible?
Or should I go through a loop of calling cmd.exe to manually expand variables?
--
WBR,
Thanks for the input, guys.
I think I have new information on the stealing of ownership. Below test has been
performed on the Apache folder, placed in the Windows Program Files folder by
the
Apache msi installer:
"/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Apache Group/Apache2/"
But if I perform the same
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:44:35PM +1100, wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:52:44AM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> >Greetings, All!
>> >
>> >$ mode
>> >mode.com modemui.dll modex.dll
>>
>> That would be /bin/sh exe magic from the looks of it. It is probably
>>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:58:21PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:52:44AM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote:
>>Greetings, All!
>>
>>$ mode
>>mode.com modemui.dll modex.dll
>
>That would be /bin/sh exe magic from the looks of it. It is probably
>just trying to find anythi
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:52:44AM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote:
> >Greetings, All!
> >
> >$ mode
> >mode.com modemui.dll modex.dll
>
> That would be /bin/sh exe magic from the looks of it. It is probably
> just trying to find anything with an executable bit set, ju
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Robert Pendell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>>
>>> On Nov 2 23:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2013-11-02 04:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Nov 1 23:23, David Rothenberger wrote:
>>Wi
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:52:44AM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote:
>Greetings, All!
>
>$ mode
>mode.com modemui.dll modex.dll
That would be /bin/sh exe magic from the looks of it. It is probably
just trying to find anything with an executable bit set, just like on
Linux.
>$ mode
>bash: mode: com
I've uploaded a new version astyle, 2.04-1, in keeping with the
current upstream release.
For a list of changes check out http://astyle.sourceforge.net/notes.html .
*** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***
If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look
at the
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>
>> On Nov 2 23:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>> On 2013-11-02 04:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> >On Nov 1 23:23, David Rothenberger wrote:
>>> >>With gcc-4.8.2-1, the following fails:
>>> >>
>>> >>% touch /tmp/
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
> On Nov 2 23:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> On 2013-11-02 04:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Nov 1 23:23, David Rothenberger wrote:
>> >>With gcc-4.8.2-1, the following fails:
>> >>
>> >>% touch /tmp/t.c
>> >>% /bin/gcc -c /tmp/t.c
>> >>gcc: error: spawn: No suc
On 2013-11-04 08:45, Charles Wilson wrote:
My about-to-be-uploaded inetutils update puts the servers in libexecdir
aka /usr/libexec/ -- and changes the /etc/defaults/ associated xinetd
and inetd.d configuration files as appropriate. 'Course, my
to-be-written update announcement will be a horrifi
Greetings, Kenneth Wolcott!
> I was going to execute a MS-VC++ compiler command, not a DOS/Windows
> command.
> I want to do as much as I could for capturing the stdout/stderr
> output and for capturing the exit status like I would as if I were on
> a Linux system, or the best that I can und
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Kenneth Wolcott!
>
>> Where can I find information regarding the pros and cons of using or
>> not using the cmd command to execute Windows commands from Cygwin?
>
> If you clarify, what exactly you are trying to achieve, it would b
On 11/4/2013 16:05, David Stacey wrote:
I believe that Warren Young was looking at modernising the Cygwin
documentation.
That work is mostly done. There's just one thing on the 'round-tuit
list: the automatic dependency generator isn't as smart as it should be.
There are several ways to tou
On 11/4/2013 15:34, David Stacey wrote:
This sounds like Apache FOP [1]. This is probably a native executable;
Nope. FOP is written in Java.
Yaakov's fop package uses gcj rather than the native Windows JRE, so it
plays well with Cygwin.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems
On 04/11/13 22:42, marco atzeri wrote:
Il 11/4/2013 11:34 PM, David Stacey ha scritto:
On 04/11/13 21:54, marco atzeri wrote:
building cygwin from cvs I just hit
xsltproc --xinclude ../../../../src_new/winsup/doc/fo.xsl
../../../../src_new/winsup/doc/cygwin-ug-net.xml | fop -q -fo -
cygwin-ug-
Greetings, All!
$ mode
mode.com modemui.dll modex.dll
$ mode
bash: mode: command not found
Now, I see two issues.
First, it is that it see .dll files as executables. Which is true in essence,
but rather suspicious, as .dll files are normally not directly executable.
Would really like an exp
Greetings, Kenneth Wolcott!
> Where can I find information regarding the pros and cons of using or
> not using the cmd command to execute Windows commands from Cygwin?
If you clarify, what exactly you are trying to achieve, it would be immensely
easier to answer your question, and the answer wi
Il 11/4/2013 11:34 PM, David Stacey ha scritto:
On 04/11/13 21:54, marco atzeri wrote:
building cygwin from cvs I just hit
xsltproc --xinclude ../../../../src_new/winsup/doc/fo.xsl
../../../../src_new/winsup/doc/cygwin-ug-net.xml | fop -q -fo -
cygwin-ug-net/cygwin-ug-net.pdf
/bin/sh: fop: comm
On 04/11/13 21:54, marco atzeri wrote:
building cygwin from cvs I just hit
xsltproc --xinclude ../../../../src_new/winsup/doc/fo.xsl
../../../../src_new/winsup/doc/cygwin-ug-net.xml | fop -q -fo -
cygwin-ug-net/cygwin-ug-net.pdf
/bin/sh: fop: command not found
Any idea which package should c
building cygwin from cvs I just hit
xsltproc --xinclude ../../../../src_new/winsup/doc/fo.xsl
../../../../src_new/winsup/doc/cygwin-ug-net.xml | fop -q -fo -
cygwin-ug-net/cygwin-ug-net.pdf
/bin/sh: fop: command not found
Any idea which package should contain it ?
found nothing as obvious on
On 11/4/2013 4:31 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:00:08PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 11/4/2013 3:35 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
Hi;
Where can I find information regarding the pros and cons of using or
not using the cmd command to execute Windows commands f
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:00:08PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>On 11/4/2013 3:35 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
>> Hi;
>>
>>Where can I find information regarding the pros and cons of using or
>> not using the cmd command to execute Windows commands from Cygwin?
>
>I think there would just b
On 11/4/2013 3:35 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
Hi;
Where can I find information regarding the pros and cons of using or
not using the cmd command to execute Windows commands from Cygwin?
I think there would just be cons to using "cmd.exe" commands from within
Cygwin. ;-) Obviously, this can
Hi;
Where can I find information regarding the pros and cons of using or
not using the cmd command to execute Windows commands from Cygwin?
Thanks,
Ken Wolcott
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 08:13:41PM +, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
wrote:
>Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] sent the following at Monday, November
>04, 2013 1:28 PM
>>Thanks for the suggestion. My Systems team need to install from
>>scratch on bare boxes, from only an image DVD (whic
Il 11/4/2013 8:27 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] ha scritto:
genini --recursive x86 > x86/setup.ini
That's an interesting piece of information, thanks!
Where can I get "genini" or "upset" from?
Anton Lavrentiev
Contractor NIH/NLM/NCBI
genini:
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cg
Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] sent the following at Monday, November 04,
2013 1:28 PM
>Thanks for the suggestion. My Systems team need to install from
>scratch on bare boxes, from only an image DVD (which contained all the
>requisites of the future machine, including CYGWIN's setup and the
> you're adding additional requirements
Rather revealing them...
The procedure is still to grab the current setup, make package selection,
download with satisfying the dependencies, then install on a bunch of
boxes in the batch mode, unattended.
When a new set of machines is to be built, repeat
Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] writes:
>> Alternatively, you can grab the sources for setup and add an option
> to do what you want the way you want it.
>
> Well, that's a trivial option with open source, of course. But also
> it means to maintain a branch of our own setup.exe, which is the
Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] writes:
>> I have an install script for Cygwin. It's not offline
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. My Systems team need to install from scratch
> on bare boxes, from only an image DVD (which contained all the requisites of
> the future machine, including CYGWIN's
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 07:11:33PM +, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
wrote:
>> Alternatively, you can grab the sources for setup and add an option
>to do what you want the way you want it.
>
>Well, that's a trivial option with open source, of course. But also
>it means to maintain a bra
Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] writes:
> As far as they can tell, there is no such an installation option that
> tells to install "everything from the download directory". What they
> do is that they run setup.exe to manually check everything from the available
> packages that they want to h
> genini --recursive x86 > x86/setup.ini
That's an interesting piece of information, thanks!
Where can I get "genini" or "upset" from?
Anton Lavrentiev
Contractor NIH/NLM/NCBI
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation
On 11/4/2013 2:11 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
Alternatively, you can grab the sources for setup and add an option
to do what you want the way you want it.
Well, that's a trivial option with open source, of course. But also
it means to maintain a branch of our own setup.exe,
On 11/4/2013 2:04 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
Are you saying this won't work?
Or do you just not like it?
A little bit of both, actually. Windows CMD.EXE has an 8K limit on the command
line
length, AFAICT. Even if that was not exceeded first time the package list
was crea
Charles Wilson writes:
> On 11/4/2013 11:00 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:32:10AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> I've got a few cleanups, and then I'll share the result. It's already
>>> helped me generate a few re-packaging requests I plan to post over on
>>> cygwi
On 04/11/13 17:30, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:00 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:32:10AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
I've got a few cleanups, and then I'll share the result. It's already
helped me generate a few re-packaging requests I plan to post over on
> Alternatively, you can grab the sources for setup and add an option
to do what you want the way you want it.
Well, that's a trivial option with open source, of course. But also
it means to maintain a branch of our own setup.exe, which is the
least favorable of all.
Anton Lavrentiev
Contractor
> Are you saying this won't work?
> Or do you just not like it?
A little bit of both, actually. Windows CMD.EXE has an 8K limit on the command
line
length, AFAICT. Even if that was not exceeded first time the package list
was created, it may easily get there on a complete re-run of the install
Il 11/4/2013 7:03 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] ha scritto:
Just make a list from that as part of your install script.
That is the problem, right there. I counted some 150 directories,
many of which contain 10+ packages, easily. A manageable install
command would have looked like "
On 11/4/2013 1:03 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
Just make a list from that as part of your install script.
That is the problem, right there. I counted some 150 directories,
many of which contain 10+ packages, easily. A manageable install
command would have looked like "setup
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:27:48PM +, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
wrote:
>> I have an install script for Cygwin. It's not offline
>
>Thanks for the suggestion. My Systems team need to install from scratch
>on bare boxes, from only an image DVD (which contained all the requisites of
>
Il 11/4/2013 6:13 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] ha scritto:
Hello All,
I'm using some recent (not the latest, though) CYGWIN release,
and trying to build a CYGWIN snapshot (for the first time)...
When I deployed the snapshot source, ran configure, then make, I saw this:
checking for
> I have an install script for Cygwin. It's not offline
Thanks for the suggestion. My Systems team need to install from scratch
on bare boxes, from only an image DVD (which contained all the requisites of
the future machine, including CYGWIN's setup and the downloaded directory,
as I previously d
On 2013-11-04 19:03, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
Just make a list from that as part of your install script.
That is the problem, right there. I counted some 150 directories,
many of which contain 10+ packages, easily. A manageable install
command would have looked like "setup.
> does not cause any ill side-effects, either (just as yet, at least).
Maybe I spoke too soon, or maybe it's not at all related, but my build
finally failed like this:
...
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/lavr/cygwin-snapshot-20130925-1/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/lsaauth'
make[3]: Entering directory
> Just make a list from that as part of your install script.
That is the problem, right there. I counted some 150 directories,
many of which contain 10+ packages, easily. A manageable install
command would have looked like "setup.exe -L directory -a" to
get and install everything it could have f
On 04/11/13 14:24, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 04/11/2013 7:47 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Kptain!
Today my Cygwin package is around 1.4Gb.
I've tried to restrict amount of package required by distribution,
it seems
lot of dependencies are required.
Does someone know how to restrict and op
On 11/4/2013 12:22 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
Though I haven't experimented with this myself, I'd recommend looking at
using "setup*.exe" on the command line and listing the packages to install
there.
Thanks. But I P.S.'d about that option as undesirable -- as it requires
Greetings, Charles Wilson!
> On 11/4/2013 6:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Nov 2 23:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>> So, while I'm not convinced that this is a huge issue overall, if
>>> "don't do that" isn't good enough, the easiest workaround is to
>>> configure GCC with --libexecdir=/usr
> Though I haven't experimented with this myself, I'd recommend looking at
> using "setup*.exe" on the command line and listing the packages to install
> there.
Thanks. But I P.S.'d about that option as undesirable -- as it requires to
maintain quite a long list of packages, all listed individual
Hello All,
I'm using some recent (not the latest, though) CYGWIN release,
and trying to build a CYGWIN snapshot (for the first time)...
When I deployed the snapshot source, ran configure, then make, I saw this:
checking for .preinit_array/.init_array/.fini_array support... readelf: Error:
Not a
On 11/4/2013 11:22 AM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
Hello All,
I am trying to help my site's Systems team to straighten up CYGWIN
installation process, which they will need to perform to build new
PCs, and I have volunteered to ask on their behalf here..
As far as they can tell,
On 11/4/2013 9:50 AM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
Haha, yes. But if my students have to administer remote
production-machines, most of the time they have no other option. I want them
to succeed where others fail.
Reading this thread, it looks like it digressed far away from the
Gert Koefoed Andersen wrote:
>
> I have compiled lot of sources on linux systems and got now errors here but
> on cygwin on my windows 7 32bit things not like to work for me.
> What I ever I have done for it, like:
> Cd /cygdrive/k/huskysrc/smapi
> Or copied it to /src/src/huskysrc
> Cd /usr/src/h
On 04/11/2013 11:00 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:32:10AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 10/30/2013 9:51 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 30/10/2013 8:48 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
Yeah; even for my stripped-down version, I need to pre-process the
setup.ini and remove all
Thanks all for your fast replies!
Probably I've missed something after package selection to prevent loader to
include useless packages.
I'll restart from scratch a new selection expecting to reach something like
400MB.
Please note that packages representing biggest size are located from
/usr/shar
Hello All,
I am trying to help my site's Systems team to straighten up CYGWIN
installation process, which they will need to perform to build new
PCs, and I have volunteered to ask on their behalf here..
As far as they can tell, there is no such an installation option that
tells to install "everyt
On Nov 4 10:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:53:43PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Nov 3 14:13, Bill Welch wrote:
> >> My apologies for the snark. The list archive ends at the same
> >> message as the top of the second page of the nabble rendering and I
> >> didn'
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:32:10AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>On 10/30/2013 9:51 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>> On 30/10/2013 8:48 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> Yeah; even for my stripped-down version, I need to pre-process the
>>> setup.ini and remove all mentions of cygwin, libstdc++6, libgcc1, et
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:53:43PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Nov 3 14:13, Bill Welch wrote:
>> My apologies for the snark. The list archive ends at the same
>> message as the top of the second page of the nabble rendering and I
>> didn't immediately see the additional messages in nabble t
> > Haha, yes. But if my students have to administer remote
> production-machines, most of the time they have no other option. I want them
> to succeed where others fail.
Reading this thread, it looks like it digressed far away from the original point
($subject) as to why "vi" did not keep the ori
On 11/4/2013 6:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 2 23:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
So, while I'm not convinced that this is a huge issue overall, if
"don't do that" isn't good enough, the easiest workaround is to
configure GCC with --libexecdir=/usr/lib.
That would be the safer option, I
On 04/11/2013 9:24 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 04/11/2013 7:47 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Kptain!
Today my Cygwin package is around 1.4Gb.
I've tried to restrict amount of package required by distribution,
it seems
lot of dependencies are required.
Does someone know how to restrict an
On 10/30/2013 9:51 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 30/10/2013 8:48 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
Yeah; even for my stripped-down version, I need to pre-process the
setup.ini and remove all mentions of cygwin, libstdc++6, libgcc1, etc.
The ncurses DLLs are also a huge nexus. (It's probably easier to
excl
On 04/11/2013 7:47 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Kptain!
Today my Cygwin package is around 1.4Gb.
I've tried to restrict amount of package required by distribution, it seems
lot of dependencies are required.
Does someone know how to restrict and optimize Cygwin packages knowing I'm
using i
Version 1.3.8-1 of
gl2ps,
libgl2ps1,
libgl2ps-devel
have been uploaded for cygwin (32 and 64 bit)
GL2PS is a C library providing high quality vector output for any
OpenGL application. The main difference between GL2PS and other
similar libraries is the use of sorting algorithms capable o
Greetings, Kptain!
> Today my Cygwin package is around 1.4Gb.
> I've tried to restrict amount of package required by distribution, it seems
> lot of dependencies are required.
> Does someone know how to restrict and optimize Cygwin packages knowing I'm
> using it only for this applications?
Give
On Nov 3 15:03, frigging raw email address wrote:
> When I login via ssh, I *appear* at first glance to have the same id
> and privileges as I do when I log in directly.
>
> a) If I am an administrator, then 'id -a' gives the following
>consistent answer for both direct and ssh login:
>
On Nov 3 14:13, Bill Welch wrote:
> My apologies for the snark. The list archive ends at the same
> message as the top of the second page of the nabble rendering and I
> didn't immediately see the additional messages in nabble that
> include a workaround.
Setup should work for admins in the first
On Nov 2 23:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2013-11-02 04:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Nov 1 23:23, David Rothenberger wrote:
> >>With gcc-4.8.2-1, the following fails:
> >>
> >>% touch /tmp/t.c
> >>% /bin/gcc -c /tmp/t.c
> >>gcc: error: spawn: No such file or directory
>
> Curious, are y
> Haha, yes. But if my students have to administer remote
production-machines, most of the time they have no other option. I want them
to succeed where others fail.
If this is the case, why not use the Apache instance available through
Cygwin itself instead of implementing this Windows/Cygwin hybri
Hi,
Today my Cygwin package is around 1.4Gb.
I've tried to restrict amount of package required by distribution, it seems
lot of dependencies are required.
Does someone know how to restrict and optimize Cygwin packages knowing I'm
using it only for this applications?
- gcc
- python
- per
> > Hello list.
> >
> > I have some first questions for cygwin works on windows 7 by compile
> > sources I normally just fine compile on my linux systems but not like
> > to compile well and by cygwin.
> > The sources I trying to compile is been packed on linux with tar
> > archiwing program so I c
76 matches
Mail list logo
