I agree with Andrey - could you give us examples of code fragments
that are not accepted by gfortran but are by g77?
Regards,
Arjen
2014-02-12 8:14 GMT+01:00 Andrey Repin :
> Greetings, Scott T. Marshall!
>
>> Would it be very difficult to take the old g77 source and recompile it
>> for cygwin64
What host operating system are you running cygwin on? Do you have
examples of your old g77 applications that are already compiled that you
can test on your current system?
There are several options. Compiling g77 is one of them, but you would
need the proper runtime components as well. It is a
Greetings, Scott T. Marshall!
> Would it be very difficult to take the old g77 source and recompile it
> for cygwin64? Has anyone successfully done this before?
It would certainly be easier to fix you code to compile with
standards-conformant compiler.
Because every other course of action seems c
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Cilix Tay wrote:
> Sorry, Christopher,
>
> One last question, so that I can properly understand this and ask correctly
> for help in xda...
>
> I downloaded Cygwin from Cygwin.com, and only selected additionally "pv" and
> "util-linux" during its installaion.
>
>
On 2/12/2014 12:28 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 12/02/2014 04:54, Scott T. Marshall wrote:
Hi All,
First a compliment: I recently went from the old x86 version of cygwin
to cygwin64. I was pleased to see that many of my perl scripts run about
twice as fast. Thanks!
My question: Would it be pos
Sorry, Christopher,
One last question, so that I can properly understand this and ask correctly for
help in xda...
I downloaded Cygwin from Cygwin.com, and only selected additionally "pv" and
"util-linux" during its installaion.
Since adb isn't part of Cygwin, then I don't understand how I cou
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 02:00:30PM +0800, Cilix Tay wrote:
>Could this be from the "util-linux" I selected during installation of Cygwin?
No. It's not a Cygwin package.
>Do you have any idea who I can contact about it?
Yes. VVV
Could this be from the "util-linux" I selected during installation of Cygwin?
Do you have any idea who I can contact about it?
> adb.exe is not a Cygwin package. You're going to have to contact the people
> who provided you with it if you are having problems.
>
> Most likely you'll be able to get
On 12/02/2014 04:54, Scott T. Marshall wrote:
Hi All,
First a compliment: I recently went from the old x86 version of cygwin
to cygwin64. I was pleased to see that many of my perl scripts run about
twice as fast. Thanks!
My question: Would it be possible to have the old g77 fortran compiler
as
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:54:40AM +0800, Cilix Tay wrote:
>I am trying to use Cygwin in a particular method to recover data on my
>phone.
>
>My phone is on Android 4.4.2, and I can't seem to get adb (Cygwin) to
>connect properly, it lists my phone but it says device offline.
>
>The Android SDK's a
Greetings, Warren Young!
>> problem was an assumption made in the 'checkfile' perl script: it was
>> assumed that cygwin1.dll is the first DLL listed by objdump.
> Details, details. :)
That's where is the devil, we know, right?
--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdae...@yandex.ru) 12.02.2014, <08:23>
So
Hi All,
First a compliment: I recently went from the old x86 version of cygwin
to cygwin64. I was pleased to see that many of my perl scripts run about
twice as fast. Thanks!
My question: Would it be possible to have the old g77 fortran compiler
as an optional install for cygwin64? I realize
Hi there,
I am trying to use Cygwin in a particular method to recover data on my phone.
My phone is on Android 4.4.2, and I can't seem to get adb (Cygwin) to connect
properly, it lists my phone but it says device offline.
The Android SDK's adb version is 1.0.31 and it connects to my phone fi
On 02/11/2014 05:06 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 2/11/2014 16:25, David Stacey wrote:
>> getpwent() is called in three different places.
>
> To those of you who have investigated these code paths: do any of them
> look like they couldn't be replaced by getpwnam() or other calls that
> would let cy
On 2/11/2014 16:25, David Stacey wrote:
getpwent() is called in three different places.
To those of you who have investigated these code paths: do any of them
look like they couldn't be replaced by getpwnam() or other calls that
would let cygwin1.dll do single-record AD/SAM lookups, rather th
On 11/02/2014 02:25, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, David Stacey!
Greetings, Andrey Repin! (I've wanted to type that for such a long time...)
I don't have my "almost everything" Cygwin install here to run it
against, so unless someone beats me to it, I won't be posting results
for man
On 2/11/2014 02:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Can you please both test the snapshot DLLs from today? Both versions,
32 and 64 bit, work fine for me on Windows 8.1.
Sunshine and butterflies:
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.3-WOW64 amanita 1.7.29s(0.271/5/3) 20140211 18:42:13 i686 Cygwin
--
Problem
On 02/10/2014 07:13 AM, carl wrote:
> I feared it :( What possibilities remain to me with a win7 system? The
> background for my problem is a windows application that sometimes
> crashes silently (it is still open but doesn't do what it should) and had to
> be restarted. A big amount of Voodoo so
On Feb 11 21:39, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> On 2014-02-11 10:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 10 16:09, Warren Young wrote:
> >> On 2/10/2014 15:53, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I can see another one, dated 22:17:21 UTC. Same problem as for the
> >>> 3rd and 4th: windows complaint that t
On 2014-02-11 10:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 10 16:09, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 2/10/2014 15:53, Denis Excoffier wrote:
>>>
>>> I can see another one, dated 22:17:21 UTC. Same problem as for the
>>> 3rd and 4th: windows complaint that this is not a windows image.
>>
>> Confirmed.
>
> C
On 02/11/2014 12:45 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 2/11/2014 2:03 PM, David Boyce wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
Just curious where we stand with this now that 1.7.28 is out.
>>
>> Assuming that further testing affirms that the SSE2 bug affecting Git
>> i
On 2/11/2014 2:03 PM, David Boyce wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
Just curious where we stand with this now that 1.7.28 is out.
Assuming that further testing affirms that the SSE2 bug affecting Git
is fixed in recent snapshots, this brings us back the original
sub
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>> Just curious where we stand with this now that 1.7.28 is out.
Assuming that further testing affirms that the SSE2 bug affecting Git
is fixed in recent snapshots, this brings us back the original
subject: is there a maintainer for Git who w
A toolchain upgrade caused some of the 32-bit recent snapshots that I
uploaded to be unusuable. Does the latest update work any better for
anyone?
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:35:32PM -0500, David Conrad DavidConrad-at-acm.org
|Cygwin| wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:11:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> as soon as we release the next Cygwin version 1.7.28, which is due very
On Feb 10 16:09, Warren Young wrote:
> On 2/10/2014 15:53, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> >
> >I can see another one, dated 22:17:21 UTC. Same problem as for the
> >3rd and 4th: windows complaint that this is not a windows image.
>
> Confirmed.
Can you please both test the snapshot DLLs from today? Bo
On Feb 10 23:05, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use XP SP3 with 32 bits and also Seven 32 bits. Today i could exercise 4
> new snapshots.
>
> The first two had the same problem (tested on XP): it seems that every
> program that has to perform something in connection with user/id/passwd e
27 matches
Mail list logo
