On 09/04/15 22:32, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 04/09/2015 04:15 AM, David Stacey wrote:
snip
I can't believe that I'm the first person to fall foul of this - any
library
that relies heavily on templates risks falling into the same trap.
snip
It's true that someone using STL strings has
On 09/04/15 18:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 9 09:15, David Stacey wrote:
The solution is to compile with '-frepo', which works for both my test code
and also poco-1.6.0 - although it has quite an impact on the compilation
time (it trebles what was already a fairly lengthy
Thanks to Andrey Repin.
The problem was that the environmet variable CYGWIM was not set.
Now everything works OK
RM
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:
On Apr 10 22:20, Christoph Weise wrote:
PAGESIZE on Cygwin is not 1024, and the right value to use for
XSI SHM is SHMLBA (== 64K on Cygwin)
Setting PAGESIZE to SHMLBA creates problems elsewhere in the program
(then PAGESIZE is too big for the program to handle, a problem I have
yet to
On Apr 11 10:47, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- To accommodate Windows default ACLs, the new code ignores SYSTEM and
Administrators group permissions when computing the MASK/CLASS_OBJ
permission mask on old ACLs, and it doesn't deny access to SYSTEM and
Administrators
On Apr 10 19:00, Steven Penny wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Please give the new code a try. I uploaded new 2015-04-10 developer
snapshots to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Here is the test I ran:
$ cd /cygdrive/c
$ touch ~/{alpha,bravo}.sh
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- To accommodate Windows default ACLs, the new code ignores SYSTEM and
Administrators group permissions when computing the MASK/CLASS_OBJ
permission mask on old ACLs, and it doesn't deny access to SYSTEM and
Administrators group based on the value of
On 11. 4. 2015 11:08, Achim Gratz wrote:
David Macek writes:
Power Users don't have access to (almost) everything, like
Administrators do. The Domain Administrators group is a member of
Administrators, so unless I'm missing something, there's no reason to
have them explicitely in the DACL.
David Macek writes:
Power Users don't have access to (almost) everything, like
Administrators do. The Domain Administrators group is a member of
Administrators, so unless I'm missing something, there's no reason to
have them explicitely in the DACL.
That doesn't stop folks from using them in
On 11. 4. 2015 10:47, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- To accommodate Windows default ACLs, the new code ignores SYSTEM and
Administrators group permissions when computing the MASK/CLASS_OBJ
permission mask on old ACLs, and it doesn't deny access to SYSTEM and
Jim Reisert AD1C writes:
From a Cygwin Terminal (MINTTY), after shutting down the X.org
server, I ran the:
Did you check that really no other Cygwin processes were running?
rebase-trigger fullrebase
command. Then I ran setup-x86, nothing to update, but let it rebase
anyway. Then I
On Apr 10 15:13, Warren Young wrote:
On Apr 10, 2015, at 4:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com
wrote:
This should help in Cygwin-Windows interoperability.
That’s pretty vague.
Would you care to list some specific expected improvements from this
change? Are there
On Apr 11 11:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 10 19:00, Steven Penny wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Please give the new code a try. I uploaded new 2015-04-10 developer
snapshots to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Here is the test I ran:
$ cd
That means, even if SYSTEM or Administrators have full access to the
file, the POSIX permssion bits will not reflect that fact. And while
other users get access denied based on the mask value, SYSTEM and
Administrators will never get access denied based on the mask.
If you want
On 11. 4. 2015 11:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Out of curiosity, does the code somehow distinguish ACLs that don't
have these default permissions (or have different permissions set for
SYSTEM / Administrators)?
I don't quite understand the question.
For a start, I'd like to point out how
On Apr 11 11:01, David Macek wrote:
On 11. 4. 2015 10:47, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- To accommodate Windows default ACLs, the new code ignores SYSTEM and
Administrators group permissions when computing the MASK/CLASS_OBJ
permission mask on old ACLs, and it doesn't
Greetings, Achim Gratz!
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- To accommodate Windows default ACLs, the new code ignores SYSTEM and
Administrators group permissions when computing the MASK/CLASS_OBJ
permission mask on old ACLs, and it doesn't deny access to SYSTEM and
Administrators group based on
I'm primarily a lurker, reading this list hoping things soak in a bit.
So I may be off base on this.
In the table below, describing NULL DENY access mask, looks like
there's a typo concerning read/execute. (of course it might just be a
windows mapping peculiarity that I really didn't want to
On 4/9/2015 8:35 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 04/09/2015 08:51 PM, John Kissell wrote:
Please remove me (kissellj-at-ecentral-dot-com) from
cygwin-at-cygwin-dot-com
Actually, that's not how this works. Just like in the beginning when you
subscribed yourself, you can also unsubscribe
On 4/11/2015 7:42 PM, John Kissell wrote:
On 4/9/2015 8:35 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 04/09/2015 08:51 PM, John Kissell wrote:
Please remove me (kissellj-at-ecentral-dot-com) from
cygwin-at-cygwin-dot-com
Actually, that's not how this works. Just like in the beginning when you
Reference: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00201.html
- [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-1
I really appreciate bug reports, but, please, try to keep the threading
intact. Please reply to mails rather than creating new threads which
have no connection to the original
Houder writes:
:-) ... I understand ... my problem is, that I am usually NOT subscribed
to the (any) list, and that I process all my e-mail using webmail, and as
far as I aware of, it does not provide the In-Reply-To feature.
You can post via Gmane rather than the webmailer.
Regards,
Achim.
Greetings, Steven Penny!
What is '~+'? Is that some weird bash feature?
If the tilde-prefix is ‘~+’, the value of the shell variable PWD replaces the
tilde-prefix.
http://gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Tilde-Expansion
In other words, ~+/ is a weird way to say ./ ?
--
With best
Greetings, Rodrigo Medina!
One nice feature of cygwin was that a link to a folder created by 'ln -s'
was seen as shortcut to the folder by WXP. Lately it does not function
like that.
$ ls -aFl Escr
lrwxrwxrwx 1 rmedina Usuarios 53 Dic 9 2009 Escr - /cygdrive/c/Documents
and
Hi,
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
Hi folks,
I just applied a patch I'm working on for quite some time now. As I
outlined before on this list, the POSIX permission handling has aged
considerably and, for historical reasons, did things differently
dependent on the calling function. I took
Versions 2.18.2-1 of
lilypond
lilypond-doc
only for 64bit are now available:
CYGWIN CHANGES
New maintainer.
First release for 64 bit architecture.
The 32bit version is not functional so investigation is in progress.
The 64 bit version is not 100% functional, but it passed
New version 1.11-1 ofed
is available in the Cygwin distribution:
CHANGES
It is a upstream bugfix release.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2015-04/msg0.html
DESCRIPTION
GNU ed is a line-oriented text editor. It is used to create, display,
modify and otherwise manipulate text
Versions 2.18.2-1 of
lilypond
lilypond-doc
only for 64bit are now available:
CYGWIN CHANGES
New maintainer.
First release for 64 bit architecture.
The 32bit version is not functional so investigation is in progress.
The 64 bit version is not 100% functional, but it passed
David Macek writes:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc776499(v=ws.10).aspx
says otherwise about the group-in-group rights.
As I see it, nesting groups is just a more efficient way of populating
them, so by expanding the nested groups recursively you'll end up with
the effective set
Hi Henri,
On Apr 11 15:25, Houder wrote:
Hi Corinna,
Reference: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00201.html
- [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-1
I really appreciate bug reports, but, please, try to keep the threading
intact. Please reply to mails rather than creating new
Hi,
My maail to this list is being reject because:
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
cygwin@cygwin.com
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the
recipient domain cygwin.com by
The following packages have been updated in the Cygwin distribution:
* emacs-24.5-1
* emacs-X11-24.5-1
* emacs-w32-24.5-1
* emacs-el-24.5-1
Emacs is a powerful, customizable, self-documenting, modeless text
editor. Emacs contains special code editing features, a scripting
language (elisp),
The following packages have been updated in the Cygwin distribution:
* emacs-24.5-1
* emacs-X11-24.5-1
* emacs-w32-24.5-1
* emacs-el-24.5-1
Emacs is a powerful, customizable, self-documenting, modeless text
editor. Emacs contains special code editing features, a scripting
language (elisp),
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
What is '~+'? Is that some weird bash feature?
If the tilde-prefix is ‘~+’, the value of the shell variable PWD replaces the
tilde-prefix.
http://gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Tilde-Expansion
--
Problem reports:
Hi Corinna,
Reference: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00201.html
- [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-1
Sorry, Corinna, but I have to ask: will this be the correct behaviour of Cygwin
from now on? ... because I am very much surprised ...
Is there anything I can do (settings
On Apr 11 11:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 10 19:00, Steven Penny wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Please give the new code a try. I uploaded new 2015-04-10 developer
snapshots to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Here is the test I ran:
$ cd
Hi Cygwin friends and users,
as outlined in https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00171.html I've
now created a TEST release of Cygwin which can be installed via
setup-x86{_64}.exe.
The version number is 2.0.0-0.1. Yes, we're going full Torvalds
with the release numbers and bump them to 2.0.
Hi Cygwin friends and users,
as outlined in https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00171.html I've
now created a TEST release of Cygwin which can be installed via
setup-x86{_64}.exe.
The version number is 2.0.0-0.1. Yes, we're going full Torvalds
with the release numbers and bump them to 2.0.
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;h=8ede2acefd1221f9af7c089f8ed4eaeea16409e9
commit 8ede2acefd1221f9af7c089f8ed4eaeea16409e9
Author: Corinna Vinschen cori...@vinschen.de
Date: Sat Apr 11 16:03:18 2015 +0200
Fix typo in new fchmod implementation
*
On Apr 11 05:47, Steven Penny wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
What is '~+'? Is that some weird bash feature?
If the tilde-prefix is ‘~+’, the value of the shell variable PWD replaces the
tilde-prefix.
Ah, thanks. Learn something new each day (tcsh user
On Apr 10 22:20, Christoph Weise wrote:
PAGESIZE on Cygwin is not 1024, and the right value to use for
XSI SHM is SHMLBA (== 64K on Cygwin)
Setting PAGESIZE to SHMLBA creates problems elsewhere in the program
(then PAGESIZE is too big for the program to handle, a problem I have
yet to
On Apr 11 14:35, David Macek wrote:
On 11. 4. 2015 11:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Out of curiosity, does the code somehow distinguish ACLs that don't
have these default permissions (or have different permissions set for
SYSTEM / Administrators)?
I don't quite understand the question.
On Apr 11 07:11, Bryan Berns wrote:
That means, even if SYSTEM or Administrators have full access to the
file, the POSIX permssion bits will not reflect that fact. And while
other users get access denied based on the mask value, SYSTEM and
Administrators will never get access
# Brief problem description
# C source file - 'printf(Test);' added as diagnostics
# Source compiles and executes in Ubuntu
# Executable compiled in cygwin terminal OK in command prompt W8.1
# - Also OK in another machine running Windows 8.1
# Same executable in cygwin term waits for input
44 matches
Mail list logo
