Re: missing 64bit ports

2015-07-16 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 7/16/2015 10:06 AM, jari wrote: On 2015-07-15 16:12, Ken Brown wrote: | On 7/15/2015 2:28 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: | On Jul 15 16:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: | Dear All, | I spent a bit of time checking the real situation of the packages | still missing as 64 bit port. | After xdelta, bsdiff

eLearning Course - Everything You Need to Know About....Negotiation

2015-07-16 Thread Billy
Written by a practitioner, you will get your investment back many times over. Go to www.procurementbusinessskills.com and www.practicalbusinessskills.com 50% discount. If not entirely satisfied guaranteed money back. B. Hughes MSc MCIPS [M] 0746-222-7806 [W]

eLearning Course - Everything You Need to Know About....Negotiation

2015-07-16 Thread Billy
Written by a practitioner, you will get your investment back many times over. Go to www.procurementbusinessskills.com and www.practicalbusinessskills.com 50% discount. If not entirely satisfied guaranteed money back. B. Hughes MSc MCIPS [M] 0746-222-7806 [W]

Re: missing 64bit ports (xdelta3 vs xdelta and pristine-tar)

2015-07-16 Thread jari
On 2015-07-16 10:10, Marco Atzeri wrote: | On 7/16/2015 10:06 AM, jari wrote: | On 2015-07-15 16:12, Ken Brown wrote: | | On 7/15/2015 2:28 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: | | On Jul 15 16:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: | | Dear All, | | I spent a bit of time checking the real situation of the packages | |

Re: missing 64bit ports (edit Gdocs problem)

2015-07-16 Thread jari
On 2015-07-15 16:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: | Dear All, | I spent a bit of time checking the real situation of the packages | still missing as 64 bit port. | After xdelta, bsdiff and iperf porting, without counting the few mingw ones, | the duplicates we are down to ~44. | | Please see here the

Re: missing 64bit ports

2015-07-16 Thread jari
On 2015-07-15 16:12, Ken Brown wrote: | On 7/15/2015 2:28 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: | On Jul 15 16:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: | Dear All, | I spent a bit of time checking the real situation of the packages | still missing as 64 bit port. | After xdelta, bsdiff and iperf porting, without counting

Re: msbuild not being found

2015-07-16 Thread Houder
Hi, I am seeing an issue when I run msbuild where I will get msbuild: command not found. Invoke msbuild.exe in stead ... invocation of msbuild will not work, because there is a directory msbuild. Or: include the following in your .bashrc: alias msbuild='MSBuild.exe -nologo' Henri --

Re: startx-xwin seg fault, signal 11

2015-07-16 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 15/07/2015 20:56, Bob Goldberg wrote: I've been running cygwin/x (x86) under xp pro for YEARS, with it working perfectly. The last update to 1.17 has been a disaster. I've read about using -listen tcp, and DISPLAY=:0.0 ; however, nothing I've tried resolves the seg fault error i'm getting.

msbuild not being found

2015-07-16 Thread Benjamin Cao
Hi, I am seeing an issue when I run msbuild where I will get msbuild: command not found. I will then run which msbuild, where it will then tell me no msbuild in The path to msbuild is within PATH, so it should be able to find it. I did a check to make sure that msbuild does exist in the

Re: missing 64bit ports (xdelta3 vs xdelta and pristine-tar)

2015-07-16 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 7/16/2015 8:35 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: jari writes: This is the command that fails (from debugging pristine-tar): xdelta delta -0 --pristine /tmp/pristine-tar.joIgDIVU9F/recreatetarball /tmp/pristine-tar.9DVOtZUF7E/origtarball /tmp/pristine-tar.9DVOtZUF7E/deltaxdel So, the option missing

Re: --line-regexp option with null data

2015-07-16 Thread Steven Penny
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: Linux grep will do the same. null byte = not a text. Wrong encoding, not matching locale = not a text. I have repeatedly asked you to stay out of my threads. My experience is you typically misread, misunderstand or misrepresent most or all

Re: --line-regexp option with null data

2015-07-16 Thread John Hein
Steven Penny svnpenn-at-gmail.com |cygwin_ml_nodigest| wrote at 20:29 -0500 on Jul 16, 2015: Consider this command: printf 'alpha\nbravo\ncharlie\n' | grep --line-regexp --quiet bravo grep sees 3 lines separated by newline, and matches the bravo line. Now consider this command:

Updated: mesa-10.6.2-1

2015-07-16 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
The following packages have been updated in the Cygwin distribution: * dri-drivers-10.6.2-1 * libEGL1-10.6.2-1 * libEGL-devel-10.6.2-1 * libGL1-10.6.2-1 * libGL-devel-10.6.2-1 * libGLESv2_2-10.6.2-1 * libGLESv2-devel-10.6.2-1 * libglapi0-10.6.2-1 * libOSMesa8-10.6.2-1 * libOSMesa-devel-10.6.2-1 *

Re: --line-regexp option with null data

2015-07-16 Thread Vince Rice
On Jul 16, 2015, at 10:04 PM, Steven Penny svnp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: Linux grep will do the same. null byte = not a text. Wrong encoding, not matching locale = not a text. I have repeatedly asked you to stay out of my threads. My

Re: --line-regexp option with null data

2015-07-16 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, John Hein! cygwin grep is detecting the input as binary which seems to be overriding the 'match the whole line' behavior of --line-regexp. Get rid of --quiet to see that. That does seem like a bug in the cygwin implementation of grep to me. Linux grep will do the same. null byte

Re: --line-regexp option with null data

2015-07-16 Thread Steven Penny
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:04 PM, John Hein wrote: cygwin grep is detecting the input as binary which seems to be overriding the 'match the whole line' behavior of --line-regexp. Get rid of --quiet to see that. It appears to be intended behavior starting with version 2.21: If a file contains

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mesa-10.6.2-1

2015-07-16 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
The following packages have been updated in the Cygwin distribution: * dri-drivers-10.6.2-1 * libEGL1-10.6.2-1 * libEGL-devel-10.6.2-1 * libGL1-10.6.2-1 * libGL-devel-10.6.2-1 * libGLESv2_2-10.6.2-1 * libGLESv2-devel-10.6.2-1 * libglapi0-10.6.2-1 * libOSMesa8-10.6.2-1 * libOSMesa-devel-10.6.2-1 *

--line-regexp option with null data

2015-07-16 Thread Steven Penny
Consider this command: printf 'alpha\nbravo\ncharlie\n' | grep --line-regexp --quiet bravo grep sees 3 lines separated by newline, and matches the bravo line. Now consider this command: printf 'alpha\0bravo\0charlie\0' | grep --line-regexp --quiet bravo My thinking tells me that