Re: RFC: setup package in Base

Jon Turney writes: > Also, I guess ideally setup should update itself first, rather than at > the same time as all other packages... Please keep an option to not do this and especially not try to access anything over the network. Setup still needs to be able to work from a local archive only.

Re: RFC: setup package in Base

On 2018-04-11 10:56, Jon Turney wrote: > On 11/04/2018 00:14, Ken Brown wrote: >> On 4/10/2018 2:12 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> In order to speed up the adoption of the latest setup.exe, would it make >>> sense to ship it as a package?  Here is an initial draft of what this >>> might look

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Git v2.17.0-1

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:01:54, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: Version 2.17.0-1 of Git has been uploaded and should be coming soon to a mirror near you. This update includes the following packages: - git - git-cvs - git-debuginfo - git-email - git-gui - gitk - git-p4 - git-svn This is an update to the

More oddities with multiple processor groups

I seem to be the first to try Cygwin on a box that has multiple processor groups, which seems odd. Anyway, I've already noticed two more things that indicate that Cygwin and/or Cygwin applications currently don't deal well with the situation: 1. Trying to run top, it shows only the first 16

Re: [Bug] File permissions across domains

Corinna Vinschen writes: > This is a bit low on detail. What does icacls say about this file? How > does getfacl report the ACL on a machine in the old domain? What does > ls -l report on the file on both machines? Does an strace on getfacl > report an error in ACL checking? There is

Re: /proc/cpuinfo vs. processor groups

Corinna Vinschen writes: >> I'm a bit puzzled about the connection between MaximumProcessorCount >> and ActiveProcessorCount here. Why isn't MaximumProcessorCount 16 >> as well? Setting it to 64 doesn't make any sense for a system with >> 32 logical CPUs in total. The way I understand it is

Re: RFC: setup package in Base

On 11/04/2018 00:14, Ken Brown wrote: On 4/10/2018 2:12 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: In order to speed up the adoption of the latest setup.exe, would it make sense to ship it as a package?  Here is an initial draft of what this might look like:

Re: How to handle length limit of PATH environment variable

On 04/05/2018 08:47 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Andrey Repin writes: P.P.S. Partial solution could be a wrapper that reduce PATH length by dropping nonessential/duplicate/Win-specific paths before invoking Cygwin terminal. I have such a wrapper for my own reasons. You don't need one if your login

Re: Gestour Venditravels

Greetings, Angelina Anglade! > *Mise a jour de Gestour Windows...* > * 0 [main] rsync 2052 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute > FAST_CWD pointer. Please report this problem to* > *the public mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com * This is mostly harmless warning. Which

Re: Gestour Venditravels

On 4/11/2018 3:33 AM, Angelina Anglade wrote: *Mise a jour de Gestour Windows...* * 0 [main] rsync 2052 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute FAST_CWD pointer. Please report this problem to* *the public mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com * Best regards/ Cordialement/ Mit

Updated: Git v2.17.0-1

Version 2.17.0-1 of Git has been uploaded and should be coming soon to a mirror near you. This update includes the following packages: - git - git-cvs - git-debuginfo - git-email - git-gui - gitk - git-p4 - git-svn This is an update to the latest upstream release. For a full list of the

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Git v2.17.0-1

Version 2.17.0-1 of Git has been uploaded and should be coming soon to a mirror near you. This update includes the following packages: - git - git-cvs - git-debuginfo - git-email - git-gui - gitk - git-p4 - git-svn This is an update to the latest upstream release. For a full list of the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-7.3.0-1 (x86/x86_64)(Test)

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:58:14, JonY wrote: gcc-7.3.0-1 has been uploaded for Cygwin. This version is for testing. Java support has been removed from upstream GCC, GCJ is no longer available. Please do these too - thank you sir - mingw64-x86_64-gcc-core - mingw64-x86_64-gcc-g++ -- Problem

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-7.3.0-1 (x86/x86_64)(Test)

gcc-7.3.0-1 has been uploaded for Cygwin. This version is for testing. Java support has been removed from upstream GCC, GCJ is no longer available. *** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO *** If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look at the

Updated: gcc-7.3.0-1 (x86/x86_64)(Test)

gcc-7.3.0-1 has been uploaded for Cygwin. This version is for testing. Java support has been removed from upstream GCC, GCJ is no longer available. *** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO *** If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look at the

Re: /proc/cpuinfo vs. processor groups

On Apr 11 11:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 11 09:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Apr 10 18:36, Achim Gratz wrote: > > > As briefly discussed on IRC I've got a new Server 2016 blade with 2 > > > sockets × 8 cores × 2 HT =32 logical processors and Cygwin spews errors > > > for processor ID

[newlib-cygwin] Cygwin: cpuinfo: Use active CPU count per group

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;h=cef1070bcbd2b484c5b149e2a7f80d3aa2943467 commit cef1070bcbd2b484c5b149e2a7f80d3aa2943467 Author: Corinna Vinschen Date: Wed Apr 11 12:45:57 2018 +0200 Cygwin: cpuinfo: Use active CPU count per group

[newlib-cygwin] Cygwin: add cuinof changes to release text

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;h=5d99256613ccbdf4dfe7ea5f01d11f0bc4775326 commit 5d99256613ccbdf4dfe7ea5f01d11f0bc4775326 Author: Corinna Vinschen Date: Wed Apr 11 12:46:18 2018 +0200 Cygwin: add cuinof changes to release text

[newlib-cygwin] Cygwin: cpuinfo: report L3 cache on Intel CPUs

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;h=402d68af1a0926bd711a36ceaf3fc07407a2983a commit 402d68af1a0926bd711a36ceaf3fc07407a2983a Author: Corinna Vinschen Date: Wed Apr 11 10:06:25 2018 +0200 Cygwin: cpuinfo: report L3 cache on Intel CPUs

Re: [Bug] File permissions across domains

On Apr 11 09:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Same here, belong on the Cygwin ML. Redirecting. > > Corinna > > On Apr 10 18:47, Achim Gratz wrote: > > > > We're in the midst of switching to a different LDAP domain > > organisation. All my accounts still arein the old domain and that leads > > to

Re: /proc/cpuinfo vs. processor groups

On Apr 11 09:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > THanks for the report but this belongs to the cygwin ML. > I'm redirecting this here. > > > Corinna > > On Apr 10 18:36, Achim Gratz wrote: > > > > As briefly discussed on IRC I've got a new Server 2016 blade with 2 > > sockets × 8 cores × 2 HT =32

Gestour Venditravels

*Mise a jour de Gestour Windows...* * 0 [main] rsync 2052 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute FAST_CWD pointer. Please report this problem to* *the public mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com * Best regards/ Cordialement/ Mit freundlichen Grüßen *Angelina Anglade*

Re: [Bug] File permissions across domains

Same here, belong on the Cygwin ML. Redirecting. Corinna On Apr 10 18:47, Achim Gratz wrote: > > We're in the midst of switching to a different LDAP domain > organisation. All my accounts still arein the old domain and that leads > to problems when lookking at shares from a mchine in the new

Re: [Bug] File permissions across domains

Same here, belong on the Cygwin ML. Redirecting. Corinna On Apr 10 18:47, Achim Gratz wrote: > > We're in the midst of switching to a different LDAP domain > organisation. All my accounts still arein the old domain and that leads > to problems when lookking at shares from a mchine in the new

Re: /proc/cpuinfo vs. processor groups

THanks for the report but this belongs to the cygwin ML. I'm redirecting this here. Corinna On Apr 10 18:36, Achim Gratz wrote: > > As briefly discussed on IRC I've got a new Server 2016 blade with 2 > sockets × 8 cores × 2 HT =32 logical processors and Cygwin spews errors > for processor ID

Re: /proc/cpuinfo vs. processor groups

THanks for the report but this belongs to the cygwin ML. I'm redirecting this here. Corinna On Apr 10 18:36, Achim Gratz wrote: > > As briefly discussed on IRC I've got a new Server 2016 blade with 2 > sockets × 8 cores × 2 HT =32 logical processors and Cygwin spews errors > for processor ID