On 2019-04-17 17:39, Sudheer Kolli wrote:
> We got an issue where we were unable to run curl or lftp and throwing error
> with cygssl_1.0.0.dll. So upgraded the Cygwin to latest version and I am
> using chocolatey installer in windows. After that also I see packages are
> still pointing to old
Ken Brown writes:
> Thanks for testing. I have STCs for fork and exec that I used when first
> writing the code, and I forgot to retest those after the recent changes. I
> just
> tried, and the fork test succeeds but the exec test fails. I'll try to debug
> that.
Take your time and thanks
On 03.04.2019 15:16, LRN wrote:
> On 05.03.2019 17:23, LRN wrote:
>> On 05.03.2019 17:07, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>>>
>>> If they're clean, worthwhile patches then I absolutely think you
>>> should get them integrated upstream if at all possible--that's almost
>>> always preferable.
>>
>> Okay,
On 4/17/2019 1:23 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> Pushed with v2 of patch 13. Developer snaps should be up shortly.
>
> I gave the snapshot some testing today.
>
> The good news is that the named FIFO branch of our code works correctly
> again and is faster than going
On 17.04.2019 20:04, Achim Gratz wrote:
> The inofficial protocol for reaching out to a package maintainer is to
> put "[Attn. Maintainer] " in the subject of your mail. Said
> maintainer may be currently unavailable or busy with other stuff, so
> please give her/him ample time to respond, i.e.
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> Pushed with v2 of patch 13. Developer snaps should be up shortly.
I gave the snapshot some testing today.
The good news is that the named FIFO branch of our code works correctly
again and is faster than going through pseudo-file STDIO pipes.
The bad news is that
LRN writes:
> Subj. I've been sending emails to this list for a couple of weeks now, and no
> one replies. Do these messages come through at all?
Yes, they do just fine.
> I know for a fact that the messages do end up in the ML archives, so
> they reach at least *some* places. In case this
On 17.04.2019 18:30, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2019-04-17 02:06, LRN wrote:
>> I've been sending emails to this list for a couple of weeks now, and no
>> one replies. Do these messages come through at all?
>
> The best way to initiate discussion may be replying to a previous post about a
> package
I too have had ongoing issues getting Cygwin mail. My spam package
regularly filters out emails for "protocol" violations which I then have
to notice and release. Some were for having multiple Reply-To headers.
I even got a notice from the list stating that email to me had been
bouncing.
On 4/17/19 7:19 AM, DJ creations wrote:
>
>
Looks like our autoresponder is not (yet) smart enough to autorespond
when the body is empty because the question was in the subject instead.
https://cygwin.com/faq.html#faq.using.fixing-find_fast_cwd-warnings
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software
On 2019-04-17 02:06, LRN wrote:
> I've been sending emails to this list for a couple of weeks now, and no
> one replies. Do these messages come through at all? I know for a fact that the
> messages do end up in the ML archives, so they reach at least *some* places.
> In case this message is being
On 4/16/19 12:29 PM, David Dombrowsky wrote:
> From there I was able to cobble together a solution using a locally
> patched version of pinentry-curses. Somewhere along the line, that
> stopped working.
I put debug prints in pinentry-tty, and it is opening the correct tty.
However, running the
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22132
--- Comment #1 from Frédéric Buclin ---
The content of attachment 10413 has been deleted for the following reason:
suspicious code
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22132
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Subj. I've been sending emails to this list for a couple of weeks now, and no
one replies. Do these messages come through at all? I know for a fact that the
messages do end up in the ML archives, so they reach at least *some* places.
In case this message is being read by anyone: i'm looking either
16 matches
Mail list logo
