On 4/24/19 3:36 PM, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
> Am 24.04.2019 um 19:54 schrieb Eliot Moss:
>> On 4/24/2019 12:43 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>>> Since MSG_EOR isn't implemented in the underlying transport layer,
>>> there's no way to implement it in userspace. That's why it's not
>>> defined
Am 24.04.2019 um 19:54 schrieb Eliot Moss:
> On 4/24/2019 12:43 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Since MSG_EOR isn't implemented in the underlying transport layer,
>> there's no way to implement it in userspace. That's why it's not
>> defined in Cygwin's headers. If you have an idea how to
On 4/24/2019 12:43 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 24 15:47, Brabant, Edward H CTR (USA) wrote:
1. In cygwin-devel v3.0.2-1, does not #define
MSG_EOR. In bash, with CWD=/usr/include, the command "find . -name
'*.h' -exec grep -Hn MSG_EOR {} \;" does not find any matches.
2. The Open Group
On 2019-04-13 01:38, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Michael Haubenwallner writes:
>> The --no-rebase flag is to update the database for new files, without
>> performing a rebase. The file names provided should have been rebased
>> using the --oblivious flag just before.
>
> That name is somewhat strange,
On Apr 24 15:47, Brabant, Edward H CTR (USA) wrote:
> 1. In cygwin-devel v3.0.2-1, does not #define
> MSG_EOR. In bash, with CWD=/usr/include, the command "find . -name
> '*.h' -exec grep -Hn MSG_EOR {} \;" does not find any matches.
>
> 2. The Open Group man page for contains the following
>
1. In cygwin-devel v3.0.2-1, does not #define MSG_EOR.
In bash, with CWD=/usr/include, the command "find . -name '*.h' -exec grep -Hn
MSG_EOR {} \;" does not find any matches.
2. The Open Group man page for contains the following excerpt
regarding #define MSG_EOR:
The header shall
On 4/12/19 7:40 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> Nick Clifton, one of the binutils maintainers, made the following
> suggestion in PM:
>
> Allow the ld flag --enable-auto-image-base to take a filename as
> argument.>
> The idea: The file is used by ld to generate the start address
>
On 4/13/19 9:38 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Michael Haubenwallner writes:
>> The --no-rebase flag is to update the database for new files, without
>> performing a rebase. The file names provided should have been rebased
>> using the --oblivious flag just before.
>
> That name is somewhat strange,
On 4/13/19 9:36 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> On Apr 12 15:32, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>>> Rather than newest last write time of all dlls loaded, use the forking
>>> process' windows pid and windows thread id as directory name to create
>>> the forkable hardlinks into.
9 matches
Mail list logo
