On 2019-05-13 15:58, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
>
> Jack, on Monday, May 13, 2019 05:26 PM, wrote...
>> On 2019.05.13 16:37, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
>>> Jack, on Monday, May 13, 2019 04:22 PM, wrote...
On 2019.05.13 16:15, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
[snip.]
> $ git clone
Jack, on Monday, May 13, 2019 05:26 PM, wrote...
>On 2019.05.13 16:37, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
>> Jack, on Monday, May 13, 2019 04:22 PM, wrote...
>> >On 2019.05.13 16:15, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
>> >[snip.]
>> >> $ git clone https://github.com/Expensify/Bedrock.git
>> >> Cloning i
On 2019.05.13 16:37, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
Jack, on Monday, May 13, 2019 04:22 PM, wrote...
>On 2019.05.13 16:15, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
>[snip.]
>> $ git clone https://github.com/Expensify/Bedrock.git
>> Cloning into 'Bedrock'...
>> fatal: unable to access
'https://github.com/Expe
Jack, on Monday, May 13, 2019 04:22 PM, wrote...
>On 2019.05.13 16:15, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
>[snip.]
>> $ git clone https://github.com/Expensify/Bedrock.git
>> Cloning into 'Bedrock'...
>> fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/Expensify/Bedrock.git/':
>> Out of memory
>I think tha
Hi Thomas,
below my detailed items:
What package? Reference, download link? How did you compile?
I downloaded the package directly from gpg site into download page version.
The version of pinentry package 1.1.0 (2017-12-03).
I compile with read me process indicated which is included i
On 2019.05.13 16:15, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
[snip.]
$ git clone https://github.com/Expensify/Bedrock.git
Cloning into 'Bedrock'...
fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/Expensify/Bedrock.git/':
Out of memory
I think that means you. Do you have enough disk space?
Before doing mu
Jack, on Monday, May 13, 2019 03:21 PM, wrote...
>On 2019.05.13 15:01, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
>upstream repository is. I'll guess here that you started by unpacking
>a tarball, and not cloning the Bedrock git repository, and that they
Yep, that's what happened. The reason why was this...
Achim Gratz, on Monday, May 13, 2019 03:09 PM, wrote...
>> So, it looks like the root (c49b808ae490f03d665df5faae457f613aa31aaf) does
>> not exists... Thanks for the quick reply, though.
>
>The submodule might look in the wrong place as clearly it is available here:
>
>https://github.com/ARMmbe
On 2019.05.13 15:01, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
So, it looks like the root (c49b808ae490f03d665df5faae457f613aa31aaf)
does not exists... Thanks for the quick reply, though.
This issue is that at that point, the higher level make assumes that
mbedtls is a git repository.
cd mbedtls && git ch
Jose Isaias Cabrera writes:
> * `/` - Contains the main Bedrock source
> * `/docs` - Source for the public website (hosted via GitHub Pages):
> http://bedrockdb.com
> * `/libstuff` - A general purpose C++ framework for cross-platform
> application development
> * `/mbedtls` - The mbed TLS from he
Jack, on Monday, May 13, 2019 02:47 PM, wrote...
>On 2019.05.13 14:17, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
>I know nothing about Bedrock, but I'd ask what you did before running
>"make." Did you do ./configure?
Thanks Jack for the prompt reply. No, there is no configure.
> Is there perhaps an autogen.
On 2019.05.13 14:17, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
Greetings!
I am trying to build Bedrockdb in cygwin. Running make gives me this
output:
e608313@HOR711318E ~/Bedrock-master
$ make
git submodule init
git submodule update
cd mbedtls && git checkout -q c49b808ae490f03d665df5faae457f613aa31aaf
Greetings!
I am trying to build Bedrockdb in cygwin. Running make gives me this output:
e608313@HOR711318E ~/Bedrock-master
$ make
git submodule init
git submodule update
cd mbedtls && git checkout -q c49b808ae490f03d665df5faae457f613aa31aaf
fatal: reference is not a tree: c49b808ae490f03d665d
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 16:49 +0200, Agner Fog wrote:
> On 13/05/2019 07.39, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > Not quite I believe Cygwin 64 bit programs follow the Unix 64 bit LP64 C
> > programming memory model and the System V AMD64 ABI *NOT* the Windows 64 bit
> > ILP64 C programming memory model and Micro
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:31 AM L A Walsh wrote:
> This has been a feature of Windows since win98. Not officially, mind
> you, but any scheduled task in windows would eventually become
> unscheduled and stop running with out any notification.
I've never seen this behavior on any Windows machine (
On 13/05/2019 07.39, Brian Inglis wrote:
Not quite I believe Cygwin 64 bit programs follow the Unix 64 bit LP64 C
programming memory model and the System V AMD64 ABI *NOT* the Windows 64 bit
ILP64 C programming memory model and Microsoft x64 calling convention; see:
http://www.unix.org/ve
On Sun, 12 May 2019 22:40:48, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2019-05-12 14:54, Houder wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 May 2019 13:33:30, Mike Gran via cygwin" wrote:
>
> >> I think these days the canonical defines are (somebody correct me if
> >> I'm wrong)
> >> __CYGWIN__ for Cygwin
> >> _WIN32 as 1 on Min
Dear Agner,
> But the compiler generates a Windows executable following most of the
> Windows ABI (object file format, calling convention, etc.)
Still cygwin is intentionally very different from Windows, e.g. on Cygwin you
use / as path separator, on Windows you use \ as path separator. Cygwin c
18 matches
Mail list logo