Hi Irfan,
I'm assuming that there is some reason you don't want to use the
password option:
-w, --passwdOptional password for user. Only needed
if a user is given. If a user has an empty
password, enter `-w '. If a user is given
but
On 5/3/2019 7:33 AM, Stanislav Kascak wrote:
> I came across a problem with memory allocation/deallocation when
> trying to compile and run tests of openldap under cygwin.
Corinna can give you a definitive response when she returns from vacation, but
I
looked at the code and have a few comments.
Am 20.05.2019 um 21:12 schrieb Jose Isaias Cabrera:
> There is no configure script on the source directory,
And that should have been a warning to you.
This is the most portability-ignorant open source package I've seen in a
long time, and by a very wide margin. They don't even _try_ to
accomo
Greetings.
After a few weeks trying to build Bedrock with gcc-6, I abandoned that idea and
now I want to do it with the default cygwin compilers (gcc & g++ 7.4.0).
The first problem I encountered was,
libstuff/libstuff.h:7:10: fatal error: execinfo.h: No such file or directory
and this one I
On 5/20/19 10:27 AM, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
Erik Soderquist, on Monday, May 20, 2019 10:16 AM, wrote...
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Bob Cochran wrote:
"Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered a
(pre)historic solution."
The words of the ignorant, in my opin
Bob Cochran writes:
> We recently wrote up our process on building OpenOCD using Cygwin on
> Windows 10 and shared it on the OpenOCD mail list. And, I received
> the following feedback:
>
> "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered
> a (pre)historic solution."
More li
Csaba Raduly, on Sunday, May 19, 2019 04:37 AM, wrote...
>On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 4:57 AM Jack wrote:
>>
>> On 5/18/19 9:24 PM, Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote:
>> > How do I uninstall the installation that I created with the building of
>> > gcc6? I did a search on duckduckgo for,
>> >
>> > cygwin h
Erik Soderquist, on Monday, May 20, 2019 10:16 AM, wrote...
>On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Bob Cochran wrote:
>
>> "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered a
>> (pre)historic solution."
>
>The words of the ignorant, in my opinion. Cygwin has done an
>excellent job
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Bob Cochran wrote:
> "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered a
> (pre)historic solution."
The words of the ignorant, in my opinion. Cygwin has done an
excellent job of maintaining currency and usefulness.
> I would appreciate any fe
9 matches
Mail list logo